AMD Radeon RX 550 2GB Review
Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
World of Warcraft (DX11)
Quality Level 4 Results
Getting WoW to look remotely playable on HD Graphics 530 took dialing back to 4 on the game’s quality slider. That same setting yields incredibly fast frame rates on the Radeon cards.
You can even see in the frame rate over time chart where our flight path sequence goes from graphics-bound (separation between cards) to platform-bound (they converge into one line) and back again.
Curious whether WoW would still be playable on the Radeons with more demanding settings, we cranked the quality knob up to 10 and retested without HD Graphics 530.
Quality Level 10 Results
At a slider level of 4, Radeon RX 550 achieves 87% of the RX 460’s performance. Pushing the slider to 10 drops that number to 84%. In absolute terms, the RX 550 falls from 142 FPS to 31.7. Clearly the graphics workload is more intense. But Polaris 11 doesn’t pull away from AMD’s newest GPU, telling us that they’re limited by a common bottleneck.
MORE: Best Graphics Cards
MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table
MORE: All Graphics Content
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Chinese and Iranian hackers use ChatGPT and LLM tools to create malware and phishing attacks — OpenAI report has recorded over 20 cyberattacks created with ChatGPT
Steam checkout banner clarifies you don’t own the game you buy — GOG takes a jab at Steam, saying it gives users offline installers that cannot be taken away
Old-school Nintendo console gets Bluetooth and improved audio features with addon — NES hub utilizes previously unused expansion port
-
dstarr3 Wow, can't even hit 60fps in Doom. Talk about a sheep in wolf's clothing. This is barely a step above those $30 GPUs that you buy strictly because you don't have onboard graphics.Reply -
TechyInAZ 19617624 said:Wow, can't even hit 60fps in Doom. Talk about a sheep in wolf's clothing. This is barely a step above those $30 GPUs that you buy strictly because you don't have onboard graphics.
This is an 85$ GPU, competing with more the likes of a GT 740. So don't expect good details at such a low price point. $30 GPUs are worse than IGPUs BTW.
However, you can still find GTX 750s and 750 tis used for the price of a 550 and it performs much better. -
LucoTF I think if it comes down $10-$20 it will be a contender, it does solidly outperform AMD APUs and hopefully will help to keep our more budget orientated gamers away from the A8s and A10s...Reply -
MCMunroe I don't understand why these are all full height double width cards. Wouldn't the only purpose be to install in a small form factor case?Reply -
TallestJon96 They should be selling the old 460 as the 550, for $80, and then sold this gpu as the 540 for $50-$60.Reply
Its hard to buy a card that you know can't keep up with the consoles. What happens when a big game comes out and you don't have the horse power to actually play it? The 460 and 560 can keep up, but the 550 might he left behind.
Save your pennies for another couple weeks and buy something better, its worth the wait -
Glock24 Very dissapointing for the price. At $50 might make more sense. Then again, I would only use this for a system without IGP for video acceleration.Reply
On a side note, images finally load correctly using Firefox on Android. -
Joe Black Face it... Its a 720p card. Just like something like the a10-7890K using integrated graphics is good for 720p gaming too.Reply
That's the value proposition that should be explored. the A10 w. integrated, or the 550 discreet. -
InvalidError
There is a very simple reason nobody makes new GPUs for under $80: there is next to no profit to be made from them.19617777 said:They should be selling the old 460 as the 550, for $80, and then sold this gpu as the 540 for $50-$60.
Keep in mind that out of that $80 MSRP, there is a ~60% distributor and retailer markup on the manufacturer's own price, so the manufacturer itself only sees ~$50 of it to cover DRAM, GPU chip, PCB, support components, HSF, assembly, testing, packaging, R&D, marketing, gross profit margin, etc. In other words, manufacturers barely break even on those and don't want you to buy them unless your choice boils down to either that or nothing. They'd much prefer that you buy the RX560 for $20-30 more which translates to $10-20 more gross profit for the manufacturer.
Who are you going to get an alternative sub-$100 GPU from? Nvidia has bailed out of that market altogether to focus on $150+ (launch-time MSRP) GPUs. -
ohim The card is for E-Sports gaming and instead of starting with CS/DOTA etc you start with Doom and BF1.. games for which the card is not intended :)Reply