The Crucial M550 SSD Review: Striking Back With More Performance
Crucial's M500 brought mainstream performance, enhanced features, and rock-bottom pricing together in one of the most-recommended SSDs of 2013. Following up, Crucial has a refined version called the M550, juiced-up for performance-hungry enthusiasts.
Test Setup And Benchmarks
Our consumer storage test bench is based on Intel's Z77 Platform Controller Hub paired with an Intel Core i5-2400 CPU. Intel's 6- and 7-series chipsets are virtually identical from a storage perspective. We're standardizing on older RST 10.6.1002 drivers for the foreseeable future.
Updates to the RST driver package occasionally result in subtle performance changes. They can also lead to some truly profound variance in scores and results as well, depending on the revision. Some versions flush writes more or less frequently. Others work better in RAID situations. Builds 11.2 and newer support TRIM in RAID as well. Regardless, results obtained with one revision may or may not be comparable to results obtained with another, so sticking with one version across all testing is mandatory.
Test Hardware | |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5-2400 (Sandy Bridge), 32 nm, 3.1 GHz, LGA 1155, 6 MB Shared L3, Turbo Boost Enabled |
Motherboard | Gigabyte G1.Sniper M3 |
Memory | G.Skill Ripjaws 8 GB (2 x 4 GB) DDR3-1866 @ DDR3-1333, 1.5 V |
System Drive | Intel DC S3500 480 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: D2010353 |
Drive(s) Under Test | Crucial M550 1024 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware MU01 |
Row 5 - Cell 0 | Crucial M550 512 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware MU01 |
Row 6 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 730 480 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: L2010400 |
Row 7 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 120 GB, Firmware: EXT41B6Q |
Row 8 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 250 GB, Firmware: EXT41B6Q |
Row 9 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 500 GB, Firmware: EXT41B6Q |
Row 10 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 EVO mSATA 1000 GB, Firmware: EXT41B6Q |
Row 11 - Cell 0 | SanDisk X210 256 GB, Firmware X210400 |
Row 12 - Cell 0 | SanDisk X210 512 GB, Firmware X210400 |
Comparison Drives | Intel SSD 530 180 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: DC12 |
Row 14 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 520 180 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: 400i |
Row 15 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 525 180 GB mSATA, Firmware: LLKi |
Row 16 - Cell 0 | SanDisk A110 256 GB M.2 PCIe x2, Firmware: A200100 |
Row 17 - Cell 0 | Silicon Motion SM226EN 128 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: M0709A |
Row 18 - Cell 0 | Crucial M500 120 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: MU02 |
Row 19 - Cell 0 | Crucial M500 240 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: MU02 |
Row 20 - Cell 0 | Crucial M500 480 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: MU02 |
Row 21 - Cell 0 | Crucial M500 960 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: MU02 |
Row 22 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 EVO 120 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: EXT0AB0Q |
Row 23 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 EVO 240 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: EXT0AB0Q |
Row 24 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 EVO 480 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: EXT0AB0Q |
Row 25 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 EVO 1 TB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: EXT0AB0Q |
Row 26 - Cell 0 | SanDisk Ultra Plus 64 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: X211200 |
Row 27 - Cell 0 | SanDisk Ultra Plus 128 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware X211200 |
Row 28 - Cell 0 | SanDisk Ultra Plus 256 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware X211200 |
Row 29 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 Pro 256 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware DXM04B0Q |
Row 30 - Cell 0 | Samsung 840 Pro 128 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware DXM04B0Q |
Row 31 - Cell 0 | SanDisk Extreme II 120 GB, Firmware: R1311 |
Row 32 - Cell 0 | SanDisk Extreme II 240 GB, Firmware: R1311 |
Row 33 - Cell 0 | SanDisk Extreme II 480 GB, Firmware: R1311 |
Row 34 - Cell 0 | Seagate 600 SSD 240 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: B660 |
Row 35 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 525 30 GB mSATA 6Gb/s, Firmware LLKi |
Row 36 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 525 60 GB mSATA 6Gb/s, Firmware LLKi |
Row 37 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 525 120 GB mSATA 6Gb/s, Firmware LLKi |
Row 38 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 525 180 GB mSATA 6Gb/s, Firmware LLKi |
Row 39 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 525 240 GB mSATA 6Gb/s, Firmware LLKi |
Row 40 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 335 240 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: 335s |
Row 41 - Cell 0 | Intel SSD 510 250 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: PWG2 |
Row 42 - Cell 0 | OCZ Vertex 3.20 240 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: 2.25 |
Row 43 - Cell 0 | OCZ Vector 256 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: 2.0 |
Row 44 - Cell 0 | Samsung 830 512 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: CXMO3B1Q |
Row 45 - Cell 0 | Crucial m4 256 GB SATA 6Gb/s Firmware: 000F |
Row 46 - Cell 0 | Plextor M5 Pro 256 GB SATA 6Gb/s Firmware: 1.02 |
Row 47 - Cell 0 | Corsair Neutron GTX 240 GB SATA 6Gb/s, Firmware: M206 |
Graphics | MSI Cyclone GTX 460 1 GB |
Power Supply | Seasonic X-650, 650 W 80 PLUS Gold |
Chassis | Lian Li Pitstop |
RAID | LSI 9266-8i PCIe x8, FastPath and CacheCade AFK |
System Software and Drivers | |
OperatingSystem | Windows 7 x64 Ultimate |
DirectX | DirectX 11 |
Drivers | Graphics: Nvidia 314.07RST: 10.6.1002IMEI: 7.1.21.1124Generic AHCI: MSAHCI.SYS |
Benchmarks | |
---|---|
Tom's Hardware Storage Bench v1.0 | Trace-Based |
Iometer 1.1.0 | # Workers = 1, 4 KB Random: LBA=16 GB, varying QDs, 128 KB Sequential, 8 GB LBA Precondition, Exponential QD Scaling |
PCMark 7 | Secondary Storage Suite |
PCM Vantage | Storage Suite |
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Test Setup And Benchmarks
Prev Page RAIN: Protecting Against Small NAND Failures Next Page Results: Sequential Performance-
ikyung Heard rumors of Samsung planning to market the 850 with aggressive pricing this year. Would like to see Crucial and Samsung duke it out in pricing.Reply -
cryan Heard rumors of Samsung planning to market the 850 with aggressive pricing this year. Would like to see Crucial and Samsung duke it out in pricing.
They already have IMHO. The Samsung 840 EVO is significantly cheaper than it was at launch. It and the M500 have seemed to move in lockstep. Along the way, we've seen other manufacturers follow suit. Even Intel's 530 series, which has been on the more expensive side of mainstream products has been seen for just $140 for the 240 GB version here in the State.Regards,Christopher Ryan -
venk90 INSANELY GOOD DEAL ON AMAZON ! The 512 GB SSD is listed at 169$ incorrectly ! Grab them before they change it. I ordered 20 myself ! Will e-bay all of it or feel bad and return it to Amazon !Reply -
cryan I just splashed $250 (delivered to Oz) on a M500 480GB mSATA, eh, can't complain.
I hope Crucial continues to sell the M500 right where it is. The deals are just too good, and it'd be truly sad were Crucial/Micron to up the price on us.And they're not slow. I know it seems like they're sub par compared to some of the last few drives we've tested, but the reality is most users are never going to notice the speeds between different SSD models. The only exception is jumping from an older SATA II drive to a modern SATA III SSD. Even then, you'd need solid hardware in the system.Regards,Christopher Ryan -
Ankursh287 M500 available at $240 (amazon)..damn good drive for the price, performance difference between M500 , M550 & 840/840 pro won't visible to normal user.Reply -
Nada190 When I look at SSD's I want price to performance because I won't even notice a difference.Reply -
Drejeck Specifically for gaming which would be the best? All sort of tricks are allowed, from tweaks to samsung's magician (ram caching).Reply -
RedJaron Of course, we're in the throes of post-launch pricing. In a few weeks, it's possible that the gap between M500 and M500 will narrow.
Typo on the last page. One of those should be 550.
Happy to see Crucial with this update. I'm with a lot of people, you don't see a difference in SSD performance outside benchmarks. Give me something reasonably fast with great durability and I'm sold. With all this talk of the maturing of 20nm manufacturing, I'd love to see an M500 V2 with less overprovisioning.
-
gizmoguru Hay Tom's the chart for Sequential Reads Benchmark is labled "Random Writes", please correctReply