Apple MacBook Neo review: a budget-priced game-changer

The MacBook Neo looks and feels like it's expensive. That's the magic.

MacBook Neo
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The MacBook Neo is a spectacular budget laptop that should shock the PC industry. It never makes you feel like you're getting a lesser machine in exchange for affordability, but it would be nice if Apple could backlight the keyboard and make the ports work in a more seamless fashion.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Premium chassis

  • +

    Bright, vivid display

  • +

    Touchpad is clickable anywhere

  • +

    Most affordable MacBook ever

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Keyboard isn't backlit

  • -

    Ports are not labeled based on functionality

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Apple's Macs have typically been viewed as pricey, premium devices. While Apple clearly can't ditch its penchant for a high-quality machine, it can make them relatively affordable. With the introduction of the MacBook Neo, starting (and tested) at $599, Apple has made a laptop for most people at a price that is shockingly affordable for the platform. And considering the cost of competing PCs are, in many cases, going up thanks to RAM and storage demands from AI hyperscalers, it’s refreshing to see a major company launch a product at a new low price.

And affordable doesn't mean cheap. The MacBook Neo has the quality aluminum chassis you would expect from any other Mac, along with a bright, clear display. It certainly doesn't feel like it's a bargain bin system.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • salgado18
    I really respect your experience, Andrew. But both Mac "reviews" sounded too biased for my taste. There are too many excuses:

    "people don't know what RAM is, and don't need more" oh, they do. They just feel the system is slow without knowing why, but 8GB is still 8GB. Apple may do some "magic" with the SSD, but RAM is RAM no matter who is using it.

    "It has fewer graphics cores than the iPhone that originally housed this chip. At this price, that's fine." unless you compare it to low-energy Ryzens and Cores, which also have pretty good iGPUs.

    "But if you need a repair, chances are you'll be heading to the local Apple Store." which does not aleviate the fact that you can't upgrade anything.

    "I'm an enthusiast; I'd love to see more RAM. But plenty of people's simple needs will be met by the A18 Pro and its strong single-core performance." so you agree that there is not enough RAM, but other people may not need it?

    I mean, it may sound nitpicking, but when I open a US shop, a quick search gives me a lot of Ryzen 7 7730U, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD systems, all of them light, upgradeable, lots of ports and with good battery, for $499. 8GB is nothing these days, 2P+4E cores (almost an old 4-core cpu) is entry level, swapping SSD is a given.

    Apple is selling the premium experience, you got that right. But for that, it took away all the performance it could, turning it into an oversized iPhone. It's not that "most people" will like it, it's that light users looking for a premium-looking ultrabook will like it. My wife is a light user most of the time, but Photoshop is there for when she needs it, and there was a time she would open over 50 tabs in Chrome for research. You may not need top hardware all the time, but if you do, it needs to be there right away.

    TL;DR: these reviews felt too much like an enthusiast of Apple products and too little like an unbiased review. We need critical eyes, comparison with competitors by price, thorough bechmarks, and then find an audience for it, not the other way around. That's what I expect of Tom's Hardware reviews. (sorry for the rant)
    Reply
  • RicardoDawkins
    salgado18 said:
    I really respect your experience, Andrew. But both Mac "reviews" sounded too biased for my taste. There are too many excuses: (snip)
    This exactly. Review(s) are biased, incomplete and full of excuses.

    YES, plural review(s)!! because every site is doing the same.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    abufrejoval said:
    Yeah, that's another thing the Fruity Cult keeps missing: the dollor has fallen!

    $599 should be €514, they sell at €699 instead, but leave out the charger...
    Even with VAT it should be at most €616, with the charger included.
    Yeah at $599 it’s a pretty decent proposition but at €699 I’ll definitely pass (or get my brother in the us to bring me one for €514 if he comes over).
    Reply
  • Notton
    once again missing display performance.

    How is the ghosting/image retention on it?
    Reply
  • DS426
    I concur with most of what has been said so far. Additionally, why the puke color? I agree that iMac-like colorfulness probably resonates with many buyers in this pricing range, but bile is hardly a joy to look at.
    Reply
  • g-unit1111
    I was legit shocked to see Apple make an affordable Macbook and I actually might pick one up for travel at some point so I don't have to lug my main laptop everywhere I go. The only thing I'd complain about is the lack of storage options (though I'm sure they would add more to the cost) and the color. I'd get black or silver. I am not the biggest fan of Mac OS, but for that price, I'd definitely give it a whirl. Very well done, Apple.
    Reply
  • CelicaGT
    I think a lot of people forget that this is not competing with entry level PC's. Most people do not cross shop the two that often. This machine is aimed squarely at folks who already want a Mac, but for whom the former price of entry was too high. Also the education market, to recruit more fruit cultists (/s). It's a cheaper entry point into the Mac ecosystem and by all accounts it's a hit. Personally I have no desire to buy one as my M3 Air exists and is much better specced at 16GB and 512GB respectively. That Yellow looks pretty sweet though. The 8GB RAM situation is a bummer, might be enough for now but it will not age well (It is a limit of the A18 Pros on package memory unfortunately, as is the odd port configuration). Ars Technica has a much more in depth review and in many heavier tasks memory pressure is high and there's some swapping. Browsing and media consumption should be fine though the reviewer did put the machine through some more arduous production tasks and while technically capable it was sluggish.

    It should also be noted that the A18 Pro still behaves as if it's in a phone type thermal environment, throttling of P-cores takes mere seconds even though there's headroom for more. I expect this is more about product segmentation more than anything. Overall performance around M1 levels, as expected.
    Reply
  • skiwi44
    salgado18 said:
    I really respect your experience, Andrew. But both Mac "reviews" sounded too biased for my taste. There are too many excuses:

    "people don't know what RAM is, and don't need more" oh, they do. They just feel the system is slow without knowing why, but 8GB is still 8GB. Apple may do some "magic" with the SSD, but RAM is RAM no matter who is using it.

    "It has fewer graphics cores than the iPhone that originally housed this chip. At this price, that's fine." unless you compare it to low-energy Ryzens and Cores, which also have pretty good iGPUs.

    "But if you need a repair, chances are you'll be heading to the local Apple Store." which does not aleviate the fact that you can't upgrade anything.

    "I'm an enthusiast; I'd love to see more RAM. But plenty of people's simple needs will be met by the A18 Pro and its strong single-core performance." so you agree that there is not enough RAM, but other people may not need it?

    I mean, it may sound nitpicking, but when I open a US shop, a quick search gives me a lot of Ryzen 7 7730U, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD systems, all of them light, upgradeable, lots of ports and with good battery, for $499. 8GB is nothing these days, 2P+4E cores (almost an old 4-core cpu) is entry level, swapping SSD is a given.

    Apple is selling the premium experience, you got that right. But for that, it took away all the performance it could, turning it into an oversized iPhone. It's not that "most people" will like it, it's that light users looking for a premium-looking ultrabook will like it. My wife is a light user most of the time, but Photoshop is there for when she needs it, and there was a time she would open over 50 tabs in Chrome for research. You may not need top hardware all the time, but if you do, it needs to be there right away.

    TL;DR: these reviews felt too much like an enthusiast of Apple products and too little like an unbiased review. We need critical eyes, comparison with competitors by price, thorough bechmarks, and then find an audience for it, not the other way around. That's what I expect of Tom's Hardware reviews. (sorry for the rant)
    TLDR; In other words, this will sell like hot cakes as Apple has nailed the compromises required to bring a “premium feel” laptop at this price.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    abufrejoval said:
    Psst! He'll still have to pay taxes at the airport, but that only puts it €599, accounting for the charger.
    Technically yes, but not if you just take it out of the packaging and toss it in a bag. And even at €599 it’s a much better offer than at €699.
    Reply
  • JohnyFin
    Very good price but limited market software/games, horrible os, and Apple which charge you for breathing on the front of laptop 🤣
    Reply