Eurocom Racer: Radeon HD 6990M In A Truly Mobile Form Factor

Name: Test Settings And Benchmarks - Eurocom Racer: Radeon HD 6990M In A Truly Mobile Form Factor
Author: Thomas Soderstrom

by Thomas Soderstrom January 2, 2012 at 10:00 PM

34 Comments

Test Settings And Benchmarks

Test System Configurations
	Eurocom Racer	X7200
CPU	Intel Core i7-2960XM 2.7-3.7 GHz Four cores, eight threads, 8 MB Shared L3 Cache	Intel Core i7-990X 3.46-3.73 GHz Six cores, 12 threads, 12 MB Shared L3 Cache
Chipset	Intel HM65 Express PCH	Intel X58 Express IOH / ICH10R
RAM	Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8 GB (2 x 4 GB) DDR3-1600 C11	Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 12 GB (3 x 4 GB) DDR3-1333 C9
Graphics	AMD Radeon HD 6990M 715 MHz, 2 GB GDDR5-3600	(2 x) AMD Radeon HD 6990M 715 MHz, 2 GB GDDR5-3600
Hard Drive	Intel SSDSC2MH120A2 120 GB, SATA 6Gb/s SSD	Intel SSDSC2MH120A2 120 GB, SATA 6Gb/s SSD
Sound	Integrated HD Audio	Integrated HD Audio
Network	Integrated Gigabit Networking	Integrated Gigabit Networking
Power	Li-Shin 20 V, 7.5 A Adapter	Chicony 20 V, 15 A Adapter
Software
OS	Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Graphics	AMD Catalyst 11.11

With new benchmarks in our suite and no smaller notebooks to compare, we pit Eurocom’s Racer against one of the company's own X7200-based offerings. This should provide an excellent demonstration of the more portable machine's added efficiency, while addressing doubts about its performance.

Other parts of the larger notebook were equalized to the best possible extent. However, disabling the X58 platform's triple-channel memory configuration would heave created a false parity, since that is a built-in feature. Note that the same memory runs at a slower data rate on the X58-based machine due to Intel's official specifications. That lower data rate enables better timings, though.

Benchmark Configuration
3D Games
DiRT 3	V1.01, Run with -benchmark example_benchmark.xml Test Set 1: High Quality Preset, No AA Test Set 2: Ultra Quality Preset, 8x AA
Metro 2033	Full Game, Built-In Benchmark, "Frontline" Scene Test Set 1: DX11, High, AAA, 4x AF, No PhysX, No DoF Test Set 2: DX11, Very High, 4x AA, 16x AF, No PhysX, DoF On
StarCraft II	Version 1.4.1.19776, Tom's Hardware custom map Test Set 1: High Texture, High Quality Test Set 2: Ultra Textures, Extreme Quality
Audio/Video Encoding
iTunes	Version 10.4.1.10 x64: Audio CD (Terminator II SE), 53 minutes, default AAC format
Lame MP3	Version 3.98.3: Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min, convert WAV to MP3 audio format, Command: -b 160 --nores (160 Kb/s)
HandBrake CLI	Version 0.95: "Big Buck Bunny" (720x480, 23.972 FPS) 5 Minutes, Audio: Dolby Digital, 48 000 Hz, Six-Channel, English, to Video: AVC Audio: AC3 Audio2: AAC (High Profile)
MainConcept Reference	Version: 2.2.0.5440: MPEG-2 to H.264, MainConcept H.264/AVC Codec, 28 sec HDTV 1920x1080 (MPEG-2), Audio: MPEG-2 (44.1 kHz, Two-Channel, 16-Bit, 224 Kb/s), Codec: H.264 Pro, Mode: PAL 50i (25 FPS), Profile: H.264 BD HDMV
Productivity
Adobe Photoshop CS5	Version 12.1 x64: Filter 15.7 MB TIF Image: Radial Blur, Shape Blur, Median, Polar Coordinates
Autodesk 3ds Max 2012	Version 14.0 x64: Space Flyby Mentalray, 248 Frames, 1440x1080
WinZip	Version 15.5 Pro: THG-Workload (464 MB) to ZIP, command line switches "-a -ez -p -r"
WinRAR	Version 4.01: THG-Workload (464 MB) to RAR, command line switches "winrar a -r -m3"
7-Zip	Version 9.22: THG-Workload (464 MB) to .7z, command line switches "a -t7z -r -m0=LZMA2 -mx=5"
ABBYY FineReader	Version 10.0.102.82: Read PDF save to Doc, Source: Political Economy (J. Broadhurst 1842) 111 Pages

Previous Next

Summary

About the author

Thomas Soderstrom @hardware_tom

Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.

Laptops
Notebooks

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject

Title
Title
Subject

This thread is closed for comments

34 comments

Comment from the forums

Your comment

sodaant 6 years ago

Whats with all the noise in the pictures?
Crashman 6 years ago

sodaantWhats with all the noise in the pictures?
Sorry, the equipment probably isn't suited to shooting textured black objects.
nevertell 6 years ago

It could've easily done away with a "slower" 45w i7 quad or even a 25w i7 dualcore CPU. This would help with the mobility bit of the laptop, making it last quite a bit longer. And a 9 cell battery wouldn't hurt either.
theuniquegamer 6 years ago

It is a semi desktop by its weight i.e 10 pounds. And performs as a desktop(with 23' ips display and ups) price less than it. In the world of growing market for tabs and ultrabooks the price of mobile cpu and gpu should be lowered in order to make these premium gaming laptops popular.
Maziar 6 years ago

Great review!
It's good to see the battery life has increased notably compared to 990x.
Overall,it's a decent desktop replacement laptop.
demonhorde665 6 years ago

i sort of want one , , whats not to like about a laptop that would crunch circles around my current desktop (amd athy 64 X2 5000+ black ed Oc'ed to 3ghz, 3 gigs ddr 2 pc 800 ram , and a radeon 5770)

sure my computer still runs most current game great at my monitors max res (1600x900) but damn , i'd take one of these laptops any day for that performance booste .. here's to dreaming of winning the builder's marathon though !
cknobman 6 years ago

It would have been nice to at least see a little of the review cover things like: screen, keyboard, build quality, etc........

But good review on the graphics chip
nforce4max 6 years ago

Take a good look at the fans, notice some dust on them. Someone has been putting this laptop to use
amstech 6 years ago

The laptop maxes out at only 1920 X 1080?
The single GPU 6990M is overkill for that resolution and $2000 is a joke but hey atleast you can max everything.
Idiots out there will buy this.
scook9 6 years ago

amstechThe laptop maxes out at only 1920 X 1080?The single GPU 6990M is overkill for that resolution and $2000 is a joke but hey atleast you can max everything.Idiots out there will buy this.

That is the native res on the laptop. Which is the res most would game at on a laptop.....

And as for the price, find me a better performing laptop that is cheaper please.

Troll somewhere else
amstech 6 years ago

Thats a terrible price when a GTX 560M can handle just about everything at 1080P maxed.
1920 X 1080 isn't that hard to run, a lowly 5870M handles it well.

Whine somewhere else.
AMD_pitbull 6 years ago

amstechThats a terrible price when a GTX 560M can handle just about everything at 1080P maxed.1920 X 1080 isn't that hard to run, a lowly 5870M handles it well.Whine somewhere else.

Actually, whining is what you're doing troll "that is a terrible..." shows complaint through personal preference. Just thought you should make sure to verify what you're typing up before you type it and look like a fool...again.

Anyways, enough with the troll. Overall, the price level of this laptop seems excessive when you compare it to laptops such as G74 series and other more modest gaming laptops. But, there will always be a price premium for performance gains. As they always point out in these types of articles, it's a very niche market. In conclusion, nice review, great performance, and look forward to where our laptops will be 5 years from now Technology is fun.
amstech 6 years ago

Yeah its a ripoff for $2000.
Don't like my complaint/opinion?

And price premium for performance gains?
Your limited to 1080P what more performance do you need?

It's a niche product, and just like Alienware's topshelf stuff and Razer's new laptop, its overpriced and it won't sell.

Anytime now someone reads something they don't like they toss out the troll word.
Obvious and lame.
julius 85 6 years ago

amstechThe laptop maxes out at only 1920 X 1080?The single GPU 6990M is overkill for that resolution and $2000 is a joke but hey atleast you can max everything.Idiots out there will buy this.

And 6990M is like desktop 6870 in case you don't know.
amstech 6 years ago

Yeah thats common knowledge for mobile GPU's.

Take the 5870M.
Has 5770 specs...which is still enough to play all games at 1080P and most of them maxed or close to it.
clonazepam 6 years ago

Do an article about modding the laptop batteries. Take them apart. Replace the internal components of the batteries with something higher end found on the net or wherever if possible, wire it up, test and do a full blown how-to type article. Tom's intentially set an AMD processor on fire in the past, so maybe you could do a "what not to do" section of the article and set one on fire!

Could also be spinned on how to cheaply give new life to an aging laptop battery versus buying a new battery and price comparison of the parts vs new battery.
Crashman 6 years ago

__-_-_-__nothing new to see here. This model lacks a very important feature of a switchable gpu that could make the intel igp working tripling the battery life.
But it does minimize the number of variables when comparing the previously-reviewed 990X-based "notebook", which was the primary point of using it.

Tom's Hardware reviews notebooks on a voluntary basis, so if you'd like to see a company's newer product compared you should ask them to pony up.
Anonymous 6 years ago

Where is the Crysis benchmark Tom's ?
Crashman 6 years ago

clonazepamTom's intentially set an AMD processor on fire in the past
Ah yes the conspiracy theories. I'm sure you're referring to the article where the site pulled the cooler off AMD and Intel processors to test thermal overload protection and the AMD processor UNEXPECTEDLY burned up. Because AMD said the system would shut down and that's what's EXPECTED. Intel's advantage was not supposed to be "doesn't burn", it's advantage was supposed to be "slows down rather than shutting off".

But go ahead, keep the conspiracy theories alive. Make sure the next time 1 out of 3 systems has an Nvidia graphics card you call Tom's Hardware out on being Nvidia-biased as well.
clonazepam 6 years ago

Yes, I read the article the day it was posted... I've never said Tom's was biased one way or another in any category. Anyway, saying it was intentionally set on fire is a lot more exciting than breaking it down as you have. Also, I read it ten years ago, so I took some liberties. I think it only smoked / charred anyway. It was a cool article, maybe people will look it up and check it out now :P

I really wish you had picked apart the meat of the comment as far as battery modication vs replacement.