Alienware 16 Area-51 review: OLED screen update

The Alienware 16 Area-51's modest processor upgrade puts it largely in the same space as it was last year.

Alienware 16 Area-51
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Alienware 16 Area-51, even with a new processor, is effectively the same laptop as last year, with the exception of a new anti-glare OLED display panel.

Pros

  • +

    Strong gaming performance

  • +

    $50 mechanical keyboard is definitely worth it

  • +

    Plenty of ports

  • +

    Finally, an OLED option

Cons

  • -

    Heavy and bulky

  • -

    Worse battery life than last year (and that was bad)

  • -

    Camera downgraded from 4K to 1080p this year

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Last year, Dell's gaming arm substantially updated the Alienware 16 Area-51 with a new design. This year, the laptop has a much more moderate adjustment: the addition of an OLED display, which fans of the pricey brand have been clamoring for for a few years, and that several of the best gaming laptops already have.

Without any major GPU launches, Alienware's other internal update is an upgrade to Intel's latest CPUs, which are a light refresh that didn't provide any massive upgrades to our performance in testing.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • Greywulffcvg
    Dell sells a backpack for this beast. I'm hoping it will hold more than the laptop. I'll try to remember to update this comment after they are delivered.
    Reply