System Builder Marathon, Q4 2014: The Articles
Here are links to each of the four articles in this quarter’s System Builder Marathon (we’ll update them as each story is published). And remember, these systems are all being given away at the end of the marathon.
To enter the giveaway, please fill out this SurveyGizmo form, and be sure to read the complete rules before entering!
You only need to build a few PCs to realize that the easiest performance gains at most budget levels are found in graphics upgrades. It’s no wonder, then, that as soon as Nvidia announced a game-changing pair of high-end cards, our $1100 and $1600 System Builder Marathon authors bought one of each. Suddenly, this is a gaming machine marathon, in spite of the fact that only 15% of our overall performance score comes from games.
Anyone who assumes that we don’t take the rest of our test suite seriously is mistaken. We’ve placed SSDs in our most expensive two systems for several generations, and the top build usually has Intel’s flagship processor for whatever mainstream interface is available. Moving that platform up to six cores would have helped fewer than 15% of our benchmark suite, drawing hundreds of dollars out of the graphics budget. Then again, most of you are realistic about what we're able to do for less than $2000, realizing it'd be impossible to create a do-everything wonder system for that amount.
Similarly, doubling memory capacity from 8 to 16GB would have helped either the $1100 or $1600 build reach higher performance levels in just one of our benchmarks, while forcing either machine to give up one "level" in graphics performance. Either of us could have spent more money on RAM, but to what effect in value when only one benchmark is noticeably affected?
The maximum allowable budgets for these machines are $600, $1200 and $1800. An extra 8GB would have put Don Woligroski almost exactly against his $1200 limit, and my $1600 machine would have come out to around $1700 with the same alteration. Yet, experience tells us that the smart money in this competition goes towards cost-cutting in the places that affect performance the least. As a result, this quarter’s $600, $1100 and $1600 machines look like replacements for last year’s $500, $1000 and $1500 systems…plus an operating system.
|Q4 2014 System Builder Marathon Components|
|Row 0 - Cell 0||Q4 $600 Performance PC||Q4 $1200 Performance PC||Q4 $1600 Performance PC|
|Processor||Intel Pentium G3258: 3.2GHz, Dual-Core, 3MB LLC||Intel Core i5-4690K: 3.5-3.9GHz, Quad-Core, 6MB LLC||Intel Core i7-4790K: 4.0-4.4GHz, Quad-Core, 8MB LLC|
|Graphics||MSI R9 270X Gaming 2G||Zotac ZT-90101-10P GeForce GTX 970 4GB||PNY VCGGTX9804XPB-CG GeForce GTX 980 4GB|
|Motherboard||MSI H81M-P33: LGA 1150, Intel H81 Express||Asus Z87-A: LGA 1150, Intel Z87 Express||Biostar Hi-Fi Z97WE: LGA 1150, Intel Z97 Express|
|Memory||Team Vulcan DDR3-1600 C9, 8GB (2 x 4GB)||G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-2133 C9, 8GB (2 x 4GB)||G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-2133 C9, 8GB (2 x 4GB)|
|System Drive||WD Blue WD10EZEX: 1TB, SATA 6Gb/s HDD||Kingston V300 SV300S37A/120G 2.5" 120GB SATA 6Gb/s (SSD)||Plextor M6S PX-256M6S 2.5" 256GB SATA 6Gb/s (SSD)|
|Power||EVGA 100-W1-500-KR: 500W, 80 PLUS Standard||EVGA 100-W1-500-KR: 500W, 80 PLUS Standard||Rosewill Capstone-750-M: 750W, 80 PLUS Gold|
|CPU Cooler||Intel Boxed Cooler||ID Cooling SE-213||Phanteks PH-TC14PE_BK|
|Storage Drive||Uses System Drive||WD Blue WD10EZEX: 1TB, SATA 6Gb/s HDD||WD Blue WD10EZEX: 1TB, SATA 6Gb/s HDD|
|Optical||Lucky Goldstar GH24NSB0B: 24x DVD±R, 48x CD-R||Asus DRW-24F1ST: 24x DVD±R, 48x CD-R||Asus DRW-24B1ST/BLK/B/AS: 24x DVD±R, 48x CD-R|
|Case||DIYPC M89-R microATX||DIYPC Adventurer 9601R||Thermaltake Chaser A31 VP300A5W2N Blue|
|Total Hardware Cost||$488||$1025||$1542|
|OS||Windows 8.1 x64 OEM||Windows 8.1 x64 OEM||Windows 8.1 x64 OEM|
|Complete System Price||$588||$1125||$1642|
These were $588, $1100 and $1602 machines when we initially placed our orders. Let’s take a closer look at what happened, and how it affected our configurations.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Too bad Don didn't get his rig working properly. Oh well I guess.Reply
I was personally not a fan of the drab, bueraucrat approved case choices but overall these are some sweet rigs. I actually bought the MSI H81 / Pentium G3258 combo for my HTPC based off the recommendations here and have been really pleased with the results so far.Reply
I have little desire to read when no AMD CPU is involvedReply
AMD is over-represented in SBMs, with over 2/3 of prior graphics cards being Radeons and even one of the cards in this one being an R9 270X.14927184 said:I have little desire to read when no AMD CPU is involved
You should print that statement on foil before making your next hat :)
I hope Don is able to figure out what went wrong, then update his results with some kind of overclocking results. He did say he would try...Reply
@Crashman GPU =/= CPUReply
A couple questions: I've heard that there are some new games that don't work at all on dual core processors including the famed Pentium G3258. Have you encountered this issue and would it effect your recommendations if it's true?Reply
Tough break for Don ... too bad this one couldn't be solved with a hacksaw xDReply
If overclocking wasn't part of the competition, the $1100 rig would have been the closest to beating the value of the budget entry that I've seen in a while.
I'm really glad to see that efficiency and value are coming to the higher-performance market (even without overclocking savy).
If you're looking for value performance you can't use a card over $250, you have to SLI/XF 2 - 200-250 cards. But people aren't looking for that as frequently as it adds the cost of a much bigger power draw.Reply
I'm still hoping for a build that dual-sockets to get rid of the CPU bottleneck.
14928639 said:A couple questions: I've heard that there are some new games that don't work at all on dual core processors including the famed Pentium G3258. Have you encountered this issue and would it effect your recommendations if it's true?
The Pentium G3258 is a good processor, and people like it because it's a cheap overclock friendly solution where the low end Intel i3s are not. But as an owner of one, for gaming it really has no practical usage. The system that I use mine in is mainly a media playback machine.