Skip to main content

Seven Radeon R9 280X Graphics Cards, Rounded-Up

Dimensions And Weight

A Note about the Dimensions

The dimensions reported here aren’t necessarily identical to those claimed by each manufacturer's technical specifications, but they represent the results of our measurements shown in the diagram. We do not include the height of the PCIe power cable plugs, which needs to be added depending on the specific plug and cable used.

ModelLength LHeight HDepth D1Depth D2
Asus R9 280X DirectCU II OC287 mm139 mm38 mm3 mm
Club3D R9 280X royalKing OC265 mm112 mm36 mm5 mm
Gigabyte R9 280X WindForce 3X OC270 mm112 mm37 mm4 mm
HIS R9 280X IceQ X²297 mm130 mm34 mm3 mm
MSI R9 280X Gaming OC268 mm120 mm34 mm3 mm
Sapphire R9 280X Toxic OC301 mm112 mm34 mm5 mm
Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X OC280 mm122 mm44 mm5 mm

Graphics Card Weight

A graphics card’s weight can be interesting to know in case you need additional support, or if you're planning to build a CrossFire-based configuration that doesn't break the motherboard.

ModelWeight (Graphics Card Only)
Asus R9 280X DirectCU II OC1074 g
Club3D R9 280X royalKing OC779 g
Gigabyte R9 280X WindForce 3X OC794 g
HIS R9 280X IceQ X²963 g
MSI R9 280X Gaming OC769 g
Sapphire R9 280X Toxic OC1092 g
Sapphire R9 280X Vapor-X OC1052 g
  • jimmysmitty
    The 280X Vapor-X looks spot on like my HD7970 Vapor-X. Probably is the same GPU with the BIOS for the 280X loaded.

    But it looks like the Toxic is a pretty nice GPU. It runs very cool for the clock speed, has the highest clock speeds and the noise is not that bad.

    Now we need benchmarks of these and HD7970s to see their value.
    Reply
  • rolli59
    So guess I am waiting for the second part of the review.
    Reply
  • envy14tpe
    What does "Modified" "Throttling" and "New BIOS" mean in terms of how the data is to be interpreted?
    Reply
  • Sid Jeong
    I refunded MSI r9 280x and got Asus card due to heavy coil whine. I wonder new MSI bios fixed the issue?(by the look of it, it seems MSI traded coil whine with fan noise) btw how did the reviewer set up mic in the noise comparison video? cuz my card sounds a lot louder than that.
    Reply
  • slomo4sho
    No overclock results?
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    11857223 said:
    What does "Modified" "Throttling" and "New BIOS" mean in terms of how the data is to be interpreted?

    Modified means its beyond the original spec. Throttling means that it was overheating and lowering the clock speed in order to cool down. New BIOS means just that, that they received a new BIOS to fix any previous issues.

    11857255 said:
    I refunded MSI r9 280x and got Asus card due to heavy coil whine. I wonder new MSI bios fixed the issue?(by the look of it, it seems MSI traded coil whine with fan noise) btw how did the reviewer set up mic in the noise comparison video? cuz my card sounds a lot louder than that.

    They do a mic but it depends on your config. I think these are all open setups and not in a case.

    Also, I have never been a fan of MSIs setups. I prefer Sapphire or Asus for GPUs from AMD as they have better cooling solutions and tend to last longer
    Reply
  • CommentariesAnd More
    That VaporX and Toxic cards just look great. Hate Gigabyte's Windforce 3X for its looks. Same for the RoyalKing from Club3D. Also boo to Gigabyte , MSI and ASUS for giving no backplate. But then again , if you keep the card good , put it nicely , you wont need one unless your gonna paint it , right ?

    Waiting eagerly for a Watercooled card , although I know it wont come for the 280X as basically all of these cooling solutions especially the ICEQX2 , DCII , WF 3X , Toxic and Vapor-X just keep the card cool , till the OC limit lets em go. One for the 290X maybe..............
    Reply
  • Soul_keeper
    Good idea providing the videos.
    Some of those cards are a good deal louder or higher pitch than the others.

    Reply
  • nekromobo
    Could you also add the audio frequency of the fan (or mayhaps curve)?
    I don't know if its too hard but anyways, would seem that lower frequency would be better.
    Reply
  • In my case, in these round-ups, all I ever care to see are the Temp and Acoustic/Noise numbers, since the base 'on-screen' number-crunching performance is usually within a couple of FPS. ASUS has been a consistent performer, though I would love to see others catch-up.
    Reply