Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
VR: Robo Recall (DirectX 11)
Like Chronos, Robo Recall is based on the UE4 engine. You might think that’d spell bad news for AMD…
Although Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1080 does achieve lower (better) frame times than Radeon RX Vega 64, AMD’s card stays out of ASW mode and only drops 19 frames during our 150-second run. The 1080’s test isn’t as smooth—it drops 83 frames through the same sequence.
What’s strange is that GeForce GTX 1080 appears about 15% faster in our unconstrained frame rate chart, based on frame time. Radeon RX Vega 64 even lands under the 1070 Founders Edition card—that one also drops quite a few frames in our test (72).
Vega 56 doesn’t fare quite as well using Robo Recall’s High detail setting and 4xMSAA. An unconstrained frame rate under 90 FPS reminds us that ASW was needed for about 1000 of the benchmark’s ~13,700 frames.
Although GeForce GTX 1070 registers a slightly higher unconstrained frame rate (and thus, lower average frame time), Radeon RX Vega 64 actually achieves a lower 99th percentile frame time.
MORE: Best Graphics Cards
MORE: All Graphics Content
Current page: VR: Robo Recall (DirectX 11)Prev Page VR: DiRT Rally (DirectX 11) Next Page VR: Serious Sam VR: The Last Hope (DirectX 11)
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
AI-generated content and other unfavorable practices have put longtime staple CNET on Wikipedia's blacklisted sources
AI worm infects users via AI-enabled email clients — Morris II generative AI worm steals confidential data as it spreads
Intel Bluetooth driver update alleviates PS5 DualSense controller connectivity issues
What a crock! I didn't realize that Tom's hardware pandered to the iNvidiot's. AMD VEGA GPU's have rightfully taken the performance crown!Reply
Just when on sale Newegg and Amazon $399... Gone!Reply
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega!Reply
Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
Thanks for the hard work and in-depth review -- any word on Vega Nano?Reply
Some 'Other Guys' (Namer Gexus?) were experimenting on under-volting and clock-boosting with interesting results. It's not like you guys don't have enough to do, already, but an Under-Volt-Off Smack Down between AMD and nVidia might be fun for readers ...
No undervolting tests?Reply
Yawn....... It's 4am here at the party.....you just now showing up Vega?Reply
20112576 said:What a crock! I didn't realize that Tom's hardware pandered to the iNvidiot's. AMD VEGA GPU's have rightfully taken the performance crown!
Yeah Tom's Hardware does objective reviewing. If there are faults with something, they will call them out like the inferior VR performance over the 1070. This is not the National Inquirer of tech review sites like WCCTF. There are more things to consider than raw FPS performance and that's what we expect to see in an honest objective review.
Guru3D's conclusion with caveats:
"For PC gaming I can certainly recommend Radeon RX Vega 56. It is a proper and good performance level that it offers, priced right. It's a bit above average wattage compared to the competitions product in the same performance bracket. However much more decent compared to Vega 64."
Tom's conclusion with caveats:
"Even when we compare it to EVGA’s overclocked GeForce GTX 1070 SC Gaming 8GB (there are no Founders Edition cards left to buy), Vega 56 consistently matches or beats it. But until we see some of those forward-looking features exposed for gamers to enjoy, Vega 56’s success will largely depend on its price relative to GeForce GTX 1070."
^^And that's the truth. If prices of the AIB cards coming are closer to the GTX 1080, then it can't be considered a better value. This is not AMD's fault of course, but that's just the reality of the situation. You can't sugar coat it, you can't hide it, and you can't spin it. Real money is real money. We've already seen this with the RX 64 prices getting close to GTX 1080 Ti territory.
With that said, I am glad to see Nvidia get direct competition from AMD again in the high end segment since Fury even though it's a year and four months late to the party. In this case, the reference RX 56 even bests an AIB Strix GTX 1070 variant in most non-VR games. That's promising for what's going to come with their AIB variants. The question now is what's looming on the horizon in an Nvidia response with Volta. We'll find out in the coming months.
We've seen what they can do in a factory blower configuration. Are board manufacturers allowed to take 64 and 56 and do their own designs and cooling solutions, where they can potentially coax more out of it (power usage aside)? Or are they stuck with this configuration as Fury X and Fury Nano were stuck?Reply
No, there will be card vendors like ASUS, Gigabyte, and MSI who will have their own cooling. Here's a review of an ASUS RX 64 Strix Gaming:Reply
Will any gamers buy this card ... will any gamers GET to buy this card? Hot, hungry, noisy and expensive due to the crypto currency mining craze was not what this happy R290 owner had in mind.20112412 said:Radeon RX Vega 56 should be hitting store shelves with 3584 Stream processors and 8GB of HBM2. Should you scramble to snag yours or shop for something else?
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 8GB Review : Read more