PCMark Power And Efficiency
We tracked down PCMark Vantage performance and power consumption numbers for the default and the optimized voltage settings for both the AMD and the Intel system.
Average Power During PCMark Vantage
In the case of the Phenom II X4 955 system, the average system power requirement could be lowered from 157 to 141 W, which is a 10.2% improvement. The Core 2 Extreme QX9650 system went from 135 W to 117 W, which is an impressive result considering the processing power, which is superior to the AMD top model we used. Intel reeled in a 13.1% savings in average system power.
Total Power Used for PCMark Vantage Run
Consequently, the total power used (in watt-hours) went down as well: there was a 11.4% improvement for the AMD machine and 12.4% power savings on the Intel system. Bravo!
Efficiency (Performance per Watt) for PCMark Vantage
Finally, we related the PCMark Vantage scores to the average power the systems required (score per watt). Keep in mind that performance is exactly the same on the two machines—the only parameter we changed was processor voltage. AMD’s Phenom II X4 955 reached a 11.6% improvement in power efficiency when using PCMark Vantage as the benchmark. The Intel system advanced in terms of efficiency by 13.8%.
Current page: PCMark Power And EfficiencyPrev Page Idle/Peak Power Consumption Results Next Page Conclusion
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.