Intel X58 Roundup: Six $300+ Platforms Compared

DFI LANParty UT X58-T3eH8

Features and Layout

DFI caters to habitual system tuners in its LANParty UT series, applying this concept to the “elite overclocking” market with oversized sinks and heavy-duty electrical controls. The X58-T3eH8 continues this tradition with a removable heat-pipe extension that fits through the port panel to mount its sink externally.

But putting too much of our emphasis on the X58-T3eH8’s unusual cooling arrangement would cause us to overlook some of the motherboard’s more important features, such as its eight-phase full-digital CPU voltage regulator and perfect PCIe 2.0 slot configuration. This LANParty UT can hold three double-slot graphics cards in 3-way SLI or CrossFireX configurations without requiring additional clearance beneath the board, thanks to a two-space separation between each x16 slot and another two spaces between the lower graphics slot and the motherboard’s bottom edge.

Connector placement is similarly pleasing with an eight-pin EPS12V header at the top rear corner, an EPS/ATX main power header near the top of the front edge, and an Ultra ATA connector along the front edge above the motherboard’s center line for easy cable reach to upper drive bays. The only real annoyance is that the floppy header is at the bottom, but floppy drives are only needed for adding AHCI or RAID drivers when installing Windows XP. A well-positioned Ultra ATA header is meaningless in a system that has no associated drives, and far more people use Windows XP than Ultra ATA in new builds.

Builders of ultra high-end systems will probably be disappointed that the use of three double-thickness graphics cards precludes the use of any add-in audio solutions, since the uppermost slot position is empty. However, the empty slot position does provide a handy place to stick DFI’s Bernstein Audio Module.

Eight SATA 3.0 Gb/s headers tuck nicely under the forward edges of extra-long graphics cards, but the forward-facing orientation does require extra space between the motherboard’s leading edge and any nearby drive cages. This has long been a problem for high-end system builders, so most mid-sized and larger cases are now designed with the required clearance.

Power and reset buttons along the X58-T3eH8’s bottom edge are easily reached during bench testing, but become useless in a fully-assembled system. Next to these, a Port-80 diagnostics display allows easy diagnosis of boot problems that may have been caused by overclocking.

DFI LANPartyUT X58-T3eH8 (Revision A)
Northbridge

Intel X58 Express

Southbridge

Intel ICH10R

Voltage Regulation

Eight-Phase Full-Digital

BIOS

LX58D114 (01/14/2009)

133.3 MHz Base Clock

133.1 (-0.18%)

Clock Generator

ICS 9LPRS918JKLF

Connectors and Interfaces

Onboard

3x PCIe 2.0 x16 (Two with Shared Pathways)

1x PCIe x4

2x PCI

3x USB 2.0 (2 ports per connector).

1x IEEE-1394 FireWire

1x Serial Communications Port

1x Floppy

1x Ultra ATA (2 drives)

8x SATA 3.0 Gb/s

1x Fan 4-pin (CPU)

5x Fan 3-pins (Chassis, Power)

1x Power Switch

1x Reset Switch

1x Bernstein Audio module connector

I/O Panel

2x PS2 (keyboard and mouse)

1x IEEE-1394 FireWire

6x USB 2.0

2x RJ45 Ethernet

Mass Storage Controllers

Intel ICH10R

6x SATA 3.0 Gb/s (RAID 0, 1, 5, 10)

JMicron JMB363 PCIe

1x Ultra ATA-133 (2-drives)

2x SATA 3.0 Gb/s

Network

Marvell 88E8052 PCIe

Gigabit LAN Interface w/Teaming

Marvell 88E8053 PCIe

Gigabit LAN Interface w/Teaming

Audio

Bernstein-R889 Riser (Realtek ALC889 HD Codec)

Eight-Channel (7.1 Surround) Output

IEEE 1394 FireWire
VIA VT6308P PCI

2x FireWire 400 (1x Internal, 1x I/O Panel)


Two Marvell PCIe network chips add teaming support for Gigabit Ethernet speeds of up to 2 Gb/s bi-directionally, while the same PCIe technology limits the classic JMB363 controller to a combined 250 MB/s bandwidth for its two SATA 3.0 Gb/s ports and an Ultra-ATA 133 interface.

The Bernstein-R889 audio module moves the Realtek ALC889 HD audio codec offboard for reduced noise on analog connections.

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
36 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • arkadi
    Some times it really hard to stay objective, but you did it, grate article.
    I would consider few other aspects as well, like service and RMA statistics.
    In some countries you wont have official representation of a vendor, and in case of RMA you can end up with different MB model, usually not for the best.
    From my experience i recommend for most of you to get more common boards.
  • wdmso
    "Intel X58 Roundup: Six $300+ Platforms Compared " this title will lead
    some less informed readers that they can get the cpu memory and MB for 300.00.
    It should read "Intel X58 Roundup: Six $300+ Motherboards Compared"
    the title is misleading
  • neiroatopelcc
    I can't afford an i7 system, but when I see beautiful motherboards like that dfi and the foxconn board, I wish I could! That foxconn board almost makes me feel like looking at a beautifully built soltek board with uniform colors and good looks. Looks ain't everything, but looks do matter. I love my gigabyte board because it works great, but I would love it even more if it came 'styled' like the dfi green or the foxconn red board ....
  • Anonymous
    When you review the less-expensive X58 boards, I'd appreciate it if you would evaluate them in terms of which is the likely to be the most stable, most reliable, and most problem-free non-overclocked board. Thanks.
  • phantom93
    Lol nice article, lol i love the soldering job on the port-80 diagnostics digits for the DFI lan party board.
  • inversed
    It seems odd to have skipped mentioning the Gigabyte EX58's driver-less RAID capability. I was able to get Windows XP to boot off of a mirrored RAID without needing the floppy and the initial setup went very quickly. One unfortunate aspect of this mobo, however is that it cannot output digital audio and analog audio at the same time. So no switching between surround sound and headphones without changing settings in the audio control software.
  • jeffunit
    Though the core i7 is a crazy fast processor, it doesn't offer ECC support. That is why I just bought an amd phenom II 940. Perhaps 'gamers' don't care about ECC but only how many graphics cards they can stuff in the mb. On the other hand, IBM estimated 1 error per gig per week. So at 4gb, that is less than 2 days between errors. Perhaps that isn't noticeable with microsoft operation systems, but I keep my machines up for weeks or months at a time...

    My cheap asus mb not only supports ECC, but ECC scrubbing, chipkill, and more. Who cares how fast a computer is, when it crashes often?
  • jeffunit
    Though the core i7 is a crazy fast processor, it doesn't offer ECC support. That is why I just bought an amd phenom II 940. Perhaps 'gamers' don't care about ECC but only how many graphics cards they can stuff in the mb. On the other hand, IBM estimated 1 error per gig per week. So at 4gb, that is less than 2 days between errors. Perhaps that isn't noticeable with microsoft operation systems, but I keep my machines up for weeks or months at a time...

    My cheap asus mb not only supports ECC, but ECC scrubbing, chipkill, and more. Who cares how fast a computer is, when it crashes often?
  • Crashman
    wdmso"Intel X58 Roundup: Six $300+ Platforms Compared " this title will lead some less informed readers that they can get the cpu memory and MB for 300.00.It should read "Intel X58 Roundup: Six $300+ Motherboards Compared"the title is misleading


    You're right: I belive the word "Platform" was substituted by another editor to make the title shorter, so it would fit better in the headline bar. I might have chosen "Mobos" myself when encountered with such an issue, but they don't like using slang in titles.

    temporary87654When you review the less-expensive X58 boards, I'd appreciate it if you would evaluate them in terms of which is the likely to be the most stable, most reliable, and most problem-free non-overclocked board. Thanks.


    Good suggestions, but the problem is that all these boards were stable and built for reliability when overclocked. Using lower speeds increases stability and reliability, and you just cannot exceed "100% Stability". All the boards also used high-quality electrical components, which means a reliability test would require years to reveal any differences.

    inversedIt seems odd to have skipped mentioning the Gigabyte EX58's driver-less RAID capability. I was able to get Windows XP to boot off of a mirrored RAID without needing the floppy and the initial setup went very quickly. One unfortunate aspect of this mobo, however is that it cannot output digital audio and analog audio at the same time. So no switching between surround sound and headphones without changing settings in the audio control software.


    We'll have to see what we can do about getting the author some digital speakers or a digital receiver headset to test for such issues in the future. That particular issue hadn't come up prior to testing.
  • ryanaxiom
    What about the Gigabyte UD5? I guess it doesn't fall in the 300+ category at $288 from Newegg, but stil...

    It has all the benefits of the EX-58-Extreme minus the gigantic NB cooler, but also allows use of an x8 RAID card in the open ended slot (I have one installed) and if you get straight risers/wearout protectors you can install a x1 sound card in the top slot! The best of all worlds!!!

    The only small complaint I have is that sometimes I have to try to boot twice since the AHCI bios doesn't always want to load after post.
  • ram1009
    I got as far as reading that XP was an outdated operating system before I decided I didn't want to hear what this guy has to say.
  • Crashman
    ram1009I got as far as reading that XP was an outdated operating system before I decided I didn't want to hear what this guy has to say.


    LOL, it's a bit of SARCASM the represents what the MANUFACTURERS think of the market. If it weren't sarcasm, floppy connector placement wouldn't have been examined on every...single...board...repetitiously.
  • kamkal
    nice roundup

    if only i wasnt broke lol
  • A Stoner
    jeffunitThough the core i7 is a crazy fast processor, it doesn't offer ECC support. That is why I just bought an amd phenom II 940. Perhaps 'gamers' don't care about ECC but only how many graphics cards they can stuff in the mb. On the other hand, IBM estimated 1 error per gig per week. So at 4gb, that is less than 2 days between errors. Perhaps that isn't noticeable with microsoft operation systems, but I keep my machines up for weeks or months at a time... My cheap asus mb not only supports ECC, but ECC scrubbing, chipkill, and more. Who cares how fast a computer is, when it crashes often?


    I dunno about most people, but I have kept my Intel Based non ECC computer running for over a month with no problems. The reason I reboot my computer though has nothing to do with errors from random photons and deepspace radiation, it is because there are still companies who do not code very well and have memory leaks. Either way, I still do not have to reboot all that often, and the only time I crash and burn is when I overclock too high and the house temperature goes up enough to set off a system crash. Not exactly things I can complain about, and certainly not something that is due to the lack of ECC ram.

    I am probably going to wait until Intel comes out with it's 6 or 8 core products though before I splurge for my next computer upgrade. My Q6600 is doing just fine at 3GHz at crunching the numbers for the games I am playing today, and likely for the rest of this year. Next year though, I might be in line for a nice upgrade.

    As for outdated XP, that is what my computer runs on today, I cannot stand Vista, and Windows 7 did not find any greater love from me either. Intel may win my money, but so far Microsoft keeps punting the ball when it comes to making something that is actually an upgrade from XP. We old men change hard!!!!
  • seboj
    ram1009I got as far as reading that XP was an outdated operating system before I decided I didn't want to hear what this guy has to say.


    But it is. :)

    Anyways, good article. This was exactly what I was looking for, as I'm about to build an i7 system.
  • Aviking
    So you're saying none of the earlier driver problems are still present that have been mentioned in numereos consumer reviews, or other sites? If so great news, because it's why I've been holding off my purchase.
  • Crashman
    AvikingSo you're saying none of the earlier driver problems are still present that have been mentioned in numereos consumer reviews, or other sites? If so great news, because it's why I've been holding off my purchase.


    No driver issues with the software that was tested.
  • Aviking
    Great that puts my mind at ease, Thanks for the nice article.
  • Tindytim
    CrashmanLOL, it's a bit of SARCASM the represents what the MANUFACTURERS think of the market. If it weren't sarcasm, floppy connector placement wouldn't have been examined on every...single...board...repetitiously.

    Only reason I have a on floppy in all my machine I needed install XP on.
  • billiardicus
    Great article. Thanks!