Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, thinks it can still be saved — despite some parts being 'optimized for nastiness'

Tim Berners-Lee
(Image credit: Getty Images)

When Sir Tim Berners-Lee first came up with the idea for the World Wide Web back in 1989, his vision for it could be likened to a digital Library of Alexandria, with all human knowledge centralized, a cooperative attitude, and most of all, free. Fast-forward about 37 years, and while the Web did indeed bring the world together, it's fair to say that it didn't do so quite in the manner that Berners-Lee hoped for.

In an interview with the Guardian, Berners-Lee discusses where exactly things went wrong, and how they can perhaps be fixed in what he describes as "a battle for the soul of the web," noting that "it's not too late." The Web had a fairly peaceful early start without ads, heavy commercialization, and cleanly served the purposes of information and some entertainment, but started shifting around the late '90s with the dot-com boom and "charlatans", in Berners-Lee's view.

It wasn't until the polarization of the 2016 U.S. election that he had enough with the Web's toxicity, something that reportedly left him "devastated." He acknowledges that social media does not represent the entire web, but that "the problem is that people spend a lot of time on [social media websites] because they’re addictive," having later described them as "optimized for nastiness".

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Bruno Ferreira
Contributor

Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.

  • usertests
    We don't care about the levels of "toxicity" you find proper, "Sir" Tim.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Different author, but same/similar conclusion as Technofeudalism, by Yanis Varoufakis.

    The fact that Google, Microsoft, Meta/Facebook, and Palantir own pretty much all our private info is insanity.
    I remember the amount of push back regarding privacy concerns the Obama/NSA data center got back in its inception in 2012ish, and yet now we just willingly hand over all our data.
    Reply
  • Famj__Liberfree
    Dude cant escape trying to recreate lightning in a bottle. Notice me everyone please. I am relevant!
    Reply
  • Blastomonas
    Seems to be a bit of toxicity around here.
    Reply
  • Dementoss
    Famj__Liberfree said:
    Dude cant escape trying to recreate lightning in a bottle. Notice me everyone please. I am relevant!
    Far more relevant, than your stupid comment.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Sorry to say, but I think his "Solid" project won't get much traction without regulatory frameworks that disallow the current status quo and effectively force them to adopt either Solid or similar frameworks.

    It's good that it got funded and that he's still trying to find solutions to the web's downsides!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Famj__Liberfree said:
    Dude cant escape trying to recreate lightning in a bottle. Notice me everyone please. I am relevant!
    I'm sure he knows he'll never do anything as big as his original creation of the web. I think he's just trying to use his fame and influence in a positive way. I get the sense he feels some sense of responsibility for the web's downsides.

    I have some sympathy for people who "peak" early in their careers. I think he's dealing with that in one of the better ways.
    Reply