When Sir Tim Berners-Lee first came up with the idea for the World Wide Web back in 1989, his vision for it could be likened to a digital Library of Alexandria, with all human knowledge centralized, a cooperative attitude, and most of all, free. Fast-forward about 37 years, and while the Web did indeed bring the world together, it's fair to say that it didn't do so quite in the manner that Berners-Lee hoped for.
In an interview with the Guardian, Berners-Lee discusses where exactly things went wrong, and how they can perhaps be fixed in what he describes as "a battle for the soul of the web," noting that "it's not too late." The Web had a fairly peaceful early start without ads, heavy commercialization, and cleanly served the purposes of information and some entertainment, but started shifting around the late '90s with the dot-com boom and "charlatans", in Berners-Lee's view.
It wasn't until the polarization of the 2016 U.S. election that he had enough with the Web's toxicity, something that reportedly left him "devastated." He acknowledges that social media does not represent the entire web, but that "the problem is that people spend a lot of time on [social media websites] because they’re addictive," having later described them as "optimized for nastiness".
Interestingly, Berners-Lee notes that while early viewpoints on the internet were neutral and moral judgments were about how people used it, nowadays "the way you design a website, like Reddit or Pinterest or Snapchat, can be explicitly good," with the opposite, as now proven, equally possible.
He's since created and is promoting the Solid project, that can very broadly be described as a user-controlled, decentralized API for personal data sharing, accessed via standard web protocols. Users create their own "pods" where all their personal info lies, along with everything they publish online, and data collected about them. They can then choose to grant entities specific control over what data is accessed.
Berners-Lee believes this can bring sovereignty of personal data back in people's hands, and even went as far as raising $30 million for Inrupt, a company with a mission to "provide commercial energy and an ecosystem to help protect the integrity and quality of the new web built on Solid". Notably, though, there's nothing forcing the current web's gatekeepers like Google and Meta to use the Solid protocol — much less to copy any data they may be granted access to.
Still, he think that "the existing systems will fade to a certain extent, because people will get more excited in new systems." In this case, he's referring to developers engaging with the Solid project, who "they start coding just because of what they can imagine."
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You can click through to the Guardian to read the entire interview and read Berners-Lee's thoughts on social media ban laws, the AI takeover, and other topics.
Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.
Different author, but same/similar conclusion as Technofeudalism, by Yanis Varoufakis.
The fact that Google, Microsoft, Meta/Facebook, and Palantir own pretty much all our private info is insanity.
I remember the amount of push back regarding privacy concerns the Obama/NSA data center got back in its inception in 2012ish, and yet now we just willingly hand over all our data.
