U.S. Supreme Court shoots down President Trump’s tariffs — Consumer Technology Association hails 'victory for all Americans,' calls for swift refunds to retailers (update)
The White House is looking at other regulations, like Section 232, to keep tariffs in place.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
The United States Supreme Court just shot down most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs. In a 6-3 decision [PDF], the court said that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give the President unilateral power to prescribe import duties without prior approval from Congress.
The Trump administration argued that the nearly 50-year-old law gives the President the power to “regulate” the “importation or exportation” of “any property in which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.” While previous presidents have used the law to impose sanctions and embargoes on other nations, this is the first time that it has been used to apply tariffs on imports. The White House argues that the term “regulate” gives Trump the right to impose levies at will.
However, the Supreme Court disagreed with this interpretation. “The President asserts the extraordinary power to unilaterally impose tariffs of unlimited amount, duration, and scope. In light of the breadth, history, and constitutional context of that asserted authority, he must identify clear congressional authorization to exercise it,” Chief Justice John G. Roberts wrote in the decision. “IEEPA’s grant of authority to ‘regulate…importation’ falls short. IEEPA contains no reference to tariffs or duties. The Government points to no statute in which Congress used the word ‘regulate’ to authorize taxation.”
Article continues belowThis ruling nullifies the majority of the tariffs that Trump imposed on every other country, which importers and retailers paid and were, in many cases, eventually passed on to the American consumer.
The Consumer Technology Association, the largest technology trade organization in the U.S. and the group behind the annual Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas, said in a press release that this was a “Victory for All Americans” and that “the government must act quickly to refund retailers and importers without red tape or delay.”
While it's unlikely to see price changes overnight, Dr. Patrick Penfield, professor of supply chain practice at Syracuse University, says it could help reduce prices.
"This ruling will help reduce the price of computers, laptops, phones, semiconductors, and memory chips since many of these products come from Asia," he said via email, adding that Trump heavily tariffed that region.
Penfield added that some companies might go back to old vendors. "Many electronic manufacturers will start reviewing their supply chains and revisit pre tariff suppliers to see if they could potentially save money by switching back to these suppliers," he wrote.
Trump is said to have considered a 300% tariff on semiconductors under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which gives him explicit authority to apply duties and adjust imports. In fact, it has historically been used to apply tariffs on other resources, including steel and aluminum.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
While the Supreme Court ruling suspends the broad tariffs that the federal government imposed using the IEEPA, we can only wait and see what steps it will take next. For now, we don’t expect prices to go down immediately, and there will likely be a period of confusion as we see how things play out.
Updated February 20, 1:28 p.m. ET with comments about the PC supply chain.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.
-
txfeinbergs Reply
It won't at least for another 3 years.redgarl said:Finally, let's hope that common sense will slowly start to prevail again... -
Gururu There will be no end to the deny and delay strategy to keep tariffs in place for 4 more years.Reply -
SomeoneElse23 Reply
Upon which we'll get a different type of "governance" that many, perhaps not the same group, will also interpret as insane.txfeinbergs said:It won't at least for another 3 years.
It's a sad state of affairs.
At least we have somewhat of a system of checks and balances remaining. -
DS426 Reply
Yes, but just realize this is a legal matter more than a practical one in the context of this news article. SCOTUS' job is to interpret the law and determine if someone breaks it or not, and sure enough, they agreed (most of them anyways) that the POTUS did.redgarl said:Finally, let's hope that common sense will slowly start to prevail again...
Depending on the news source, this decision impacts about 60% of tariffs that the POTUS put in place. THN said "the majority" which is more ambiguous -- one might think closer to 75%, for example, or even higher. -
TechieTwo Sorry people but there are numerous other legal means to enforce the tariffs as Trump did in his first term. You can be certain that the tariffs will stay.Reply -
hotaru251 Reply
in many? you mean 99.99%?
This ruling nullifies the majority of the tariffs that Trump imposed on every other country, which importers and retailers paid and were, in many cases, eventually passed on to the American consumer.
nobody was gonna sell at a loss so it 100% went to the consumer.
Also will be a messy fallout given some companies straight went bankrupt from these changes and have already sold/closed...how do you undo that damage? Will be interesting. -
SomeoneElse23 Reply
This is what I've read as well.TechieTwo said:Sorry people but there are numerous other legal means to enforce the tariffs as Trump did in his first term. You can be certain that the tariffs will stay.
I also read that there's been almost 99 billion dollars in tariffs collected. I know some of that came from Mr. and Mrs. Consumer, but I don't think there's that much money to go around from Mr. and Mrs. Consumer for it to be even close to half of these moneys collected? -
Rogue Leader Just want to remind everyone to tread lightly on any political rhetoric here. We want you to be able to discuss this, but not at the expense of the sanctity of this site.Reply -
JamesJones44 Reply
yep, I've read that he could potentially proxy tariffs via Section 232 for anything that is manufactured with semiconductors (or the word I hate, "chips"). That's still a good chunk of what is sold. I also read that he could impose it on products that contain other specific resources as well under 122 (time limited) (wood, steal, aluminum, etc.) which pretty much hits everything. So sadly, I think this is far from over, it will just manifest differently until the next legal challenge.TechieTwo said:Sorry people but there are numerous other legal means to enforce the tariffs as Trump did in his first term. You can be certain that the tariffs will stay.