AMD Reveals Ultrathin Prototype, Roadmaps

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • irish_adam
    i think these next 18months are going to make or break AMD. If they really can sell those ultrathin laptops at half the price of intels (or just 30%) then i think they could sell alot of these.

    On the CPU side of things windows 8 will be with us soon and i think they are hoping that they will see some big improvements in benchmarks to make up for the abysmal showing bulldozer had. Also with piledriver on its way at the end of this year lets hope they've found out what happened to all that power they promised.

    As for the GPU side, they have always done well here since they acquired ATI
    Reply
  • erunion
    When AMD said they weren't going to compete with intel anymore they really meant they were going to focus on the laptop market?
    Reply
  • pharoahhalfdead
    I don't understand the difference between Piledriver and Vishera. How can Vishera be 2nd gen when Piledriver is next in line? Is Vishera another completely different architecture then?
    Reply
  • msgun98
    I wonder if this APU just ends up being a slightly souped up netbook or will it actually compete with today's SB ULV processors.
    Reply
  • coder543
    ha.. they aren't going to compete anymore. They're going to win!

    ok.. kidding. They may very well do that, but they did say there weren't interested in the competition anymore.
    Reply
  • JOSHSKORN
    AMD should've joined the mobile market. I think they'll become a sitting duck in 2 years.
    Reply
  • A Bad Day
    Would be nice if AMD added some memory to their APU, like 256 or 512 MB. Rarely do you find mainstream laptops with RAM that have higher than 1066 or 1333 MHz, and such slow RAM is bound to kneecap any integrated GPU.

    erunionWhen AMD said they weren't going to compete with intel anymore they really meant they were going to focus on the laptop market?
    I think AMD meant they had no interest in headbutting Intel over who can market the most powerful CPU.
    Reply
  • danwat1234
    I think when AMD shrinks down to 14nm/16nm, I'll buy an ultrabook based off of their hardware. I'm happy with my Core 2 duo gaming laptop for now and I can wait 5 years or so. I'm sure the Integrated graphics in the AMD chip will be much better than the Nvidia 9800gs chipset I have right now and like a 10th the power consumption.
    Reply
  • Achoo22
    I honestly can't wait to see the full specifications for these new AMD ultrabooks. News sites were awash in vendor complaints about reaching the $1,000 target set by Intel for months, and the $30-$100 difference in chip price doesn't explain how AMD is hitting a $500 floor. I'm guessing that there are going to be major compromises in multiple areas (maybe display and storage). As long as the devices manage to keep a healthy price delta between similarly equipped ultrabooks, this could be a great scene for AMD. If, however, the price of the AMD-branded ultrabooks encroaches on the Intel models after choosing all the trim upgrades, I don't see any reason to go near it.
    Reply
  • _Pez_
    On Graphics side they are already Impressive, But I do not know why I can breakout with Nvidia maybe is cuda ...
    Reply