Quantum Computer Accurately Simulates Hydrogen Molecule, Could Revolutionize Many Industries

15

Google's 9-qubit universal quantum computer
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • targetdrone
    "Classical computers aren’t that good at simulating chemical reactions. For instance, accurately computing the energies of the propane molecule (C3H8) takes ten days with a classic computer design."

    Some actual computing specs would be nice to get some perspective.



    Reply
  • itsnotmeitsyou
    Research computer simulation is often done on cluster-supercomputers. Assuming that the best anyone can get is 10days, I'm sure they weren't trying this on some i7/Xeon desktop. It was probably run on a cluster of 100-1000 processors in a university high-performance computing lab.
    Reply
  • Slatteew
    One thing i'm curious about is how quantum computing can overcome Chaos. Chaos in the context of Chaos Theory and the difficulty of modeling complex systems. On computers today, precision in the amount of digits makes calculation and modeling of many complex systems impossible because approximately the same starting points will produce radically different outcomes based on small discrepancies in the calculation and round off. From what I understand of quantum computing and this article, it may be able to have the precision, power, and much lower time necessary to effectively negate Chaos? Color me skeptical........maybe in some systems it'll work, but most complex systems will stump it and will exhibit Chaos.
    Reply
  • desolation0
    SLATTEEW - The intermediary variables in quantum computing are held in the properties of the quantum system. That system is not limited to digital precision. Assuming the program is within the scope of being solvable by that system in one pass, there is no need for intermediate rounding errors that come up in classical computing from the need to store the variables between process clocks. Only when we finally set a classical computer to interpret the results for us is that rounding error finally introduced again. This doesn't remove all potential for chaos, but does reduce one of the causes for it.
    Reply
  • Slatteew
    DESOLATION0 - Thank you for your response. Very informative. I'm not up to snuff on all things Quantum Computing so idk about some of the things you talked about. But that's good to know and I'd also agree it would reduce some, if not at least 1 of the causes of Chaos in our calculations and simulations. :)
    Reply
  • photonboy
    Chaos isn't an issue if you choose your problems appropriately. There are many types of problems that are unsuitable to a quantum computer.

    I still don't understand how the lack of memory is going to be resolved for anything more than very simple problems.
    Reply
  • hoofhearted
    Good reads for QCL (Quantum Computing Language) (Shor and Grover):
    http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~oemer/doc/quprog/node17.html
    http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~oemer/doc/quprog/node18.html
    Reply
  • rush21hit
    Pardon my dumb question, but why is it GPGPU or GPU computing deemed inadequate for such task?
    Reply
  • ledude
    Will this enable us to download more RAM?
    Reply
  • PoweredByLight
    QM is just math, not reality. It fails on many levels such as ionization energies (QM software relies on data sets calculated from trials over many years- not closed-form solutions). A classical computer running Millsian software can already calculate in real-time molecules as complex as insulin, including all binding energies. Whatever anyone thinks of the developers theoretical ideas, the software just works.
    Reply