Intel Clover Trail+: A New Smartphone Platform With Atom Z2580

Defining A New Platform

Intel’s Atom Z2580 processor sits at the heart of the new platform, its twin x86 cores running at up to 2 GHz. Core architecture does not change from the previous generation. If you run a single-threaded app with both SoCs at the same frequency, they’ll perform identically. Dual-threaded apps are expected to run faster on Clover Trail+ though, since Android’s scheduler knows the difference between physical and logical resources, and will schedule to the second core before kicking over to the Hyper-Threaded cores. Gotta love open source, right?

Although company representatives won’t comment on the chip’s power consumption compared to Atom Z2460 or Z2480, we have to assume that, based on the same 32 nm node, twice as many host processing and graphics cores would burn through battery life faster. But Intel insists that Clover Trail+ benefits from process tuning and refined power management.

We’re told that the PowerVR SGX544MP2 graphics core not only handles the phone’s screen at 400+ PPI, but also 300 on a 7” screen or roughly 200 on a 10” display (should a vendor put Atom Z2580 into a tablet).

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell - Column 0 Medfield Smartphone Reference DesignClover Trail+ Smartphone Reference Design
CPUSingle-core Atom at up to 2 GHzDual-core Atom at up to 2 GHz
Cores/Threads1C/2T2C/4T
Memory1 GB LPDDR2-800 (2 GB Max.)2 GB LPDDR2-1066
GraphicsPowerVR SGX540 at 400 MHzPowerVR SGX544MP2 at up to 533 MHz
Internal StorageMaximum 64 GB NAND packageMaximum 256 GB NAND package
CellularIntel XMM 6260; HSPA+ 21 Mb/sIntel XMM 6360; HSPA+ 42 Mb/s
Camera8 MP rear, 1.3 MP front16 MP rear, 2 MP front
Supported Operating SystemAndroid 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich)Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean)

With more performance from its CPU and GPU components, Intel seems to have reached the same conclusion as Nvidia and a number of phone vendors: alongside Internet access, imaging is one of the most prevalent smartphone usages, and advanced features able to exploit a high-quality camera are great for differentiation. The Atom SoC supports still image capture up to 16 MP, burst capture at 15 FPS using 8 MP resolution, zero shutter lag with time shifting, and 1080p recording at 30 FPS.

Intel’s image signal processor, which comes from the acquisition of a company called Silicon Hive back in 2011, is fast enough that it’s able to recognize up to 32 faces in real-time—though Intel limits the number of displayed names to five, due to UI limitations. The speed of the fixed-function processor also makes it possible to capture HDR without the artifacts you’d expect from an iPhone 5 if you tried to shoot something in motion.

If you move, HDR images don't turn out well.

In many ways, this sounds a lot like what we’ve just seen Nvidia introduce with its Chimera computational photography architecture. Tegra 4 employs a combination of OpenGL (GPU), Neon (CPU), and core calls to its camera (ISP), facilitating a flexible process capable of performing a number of different tasks. Intel counters that this likely comes at the cost of power, whereas its ISP has custom hardware for some of the same features. That’s not to say Intel doesn’t touch its CPU and GPU cores—load-balancing is used to balance processing on either side of the ISP.  

Clover Trail+: An Intermediate Step

Without question, Intel’s impending shift to 22 nm manufacturing for Atom represents the largest window of opportunity for the company to assert itself. Until that happens later in 2013, though, we have Clover Trail+.

The low-level speeds and feeds folks are going to look at this platform and see twice as many x86 cores, a much more capable graphics engine, up to twice the RAM, as much as double the NAND storage, and an evolved camera.

At a high level, however, Clover Trail+ is incremental, allowing Intel to update its reference phone, a year’s worth of optimization work, and the feature list (largely enabled by more potent hardware). There’s no word from Intel on whether this platform supports LTE, though the company does update Clover Trail+’s cellular modem to the HSPA+-compatible XMM 6360.

Chris Angelini
Chris Angelini is an Editor Emeritus at Tom's Hardware US. He edits hardware reviews and covers high-profile CPU and GPU launches.
  • Computerrock1
    ^ It's atom, known for 5~6 watt chips...
    Reply
  • kartu
    If I remember correctly, margins in mobile market are so small by Intel's standards, that even if they manage to capture most of the market it would still be a laughable income for them.

    So the only reason they are doing it is: fear.

    And oh well, no thanks, dear Intel, enjoy your x86 margins while you can.
    Reply
  • drakefyre
    kartuIf I remember correctly, margins in mobile market are so small by Intel's standards, that even if they manage to capture most of the market it would still be a laughable income for them.So the only reason they are doing it is: fear.And oh well, no thanks, dear Intel, enjoy your x86 margins while you can.If they can put out a superior product, even if it is due to fear, more power to them.
    Reply
  • irish_adam
    drakefyreIf they can put out a superior product, even if it is due to fear, more power to them.

    errr what? the last thing we need is intel dominating another market. At some point we do need to move away from x86 as Intel pretty much hold all the cards for it and refuses to licence it anymore. I'm pretty sure AMD and VIA are the only ones that have one, neither of which have the money or resources to present a challenge to Intel hence why they have a monopoly
    Reply
  • TimeLass
    Yeah i have been waiting for the released of smartphones that are powered by Intel's CPU for a long time and finally here it is...! i believe they will improve a lot in future as time goes on...
    Reply
  • ubercake
    There are rounded corners on that rectangle. I smell an Apple patent lawsuit.
    Reply
  • catfishtx
    We should all want Intel to succeed in this market. Anytime we get these companies innovating, pushing the boundaries, and competing on price, we all win as consumers. ARM vs. Intel vs. nVidia vs. AMD = WIN.
    Reply
  • realibrad
    irish_adamerrr what? the last thing we need is intel dominating another market. At some point we do need to move away from x86 as Intel pretty much hold all the cards for it and refuses to licence it anymore. I'm pretty sure AMD and VIA are the only ones that have one, neither of which have the money or resources to present a challenge to Intel hence why they have a monopoly
    Intel has pushed out a product that is currently the best thing in the X86 market. AMD had pushed Intel, and Intel responded with a CPU that currently is more than enough for 90% of the people. Im more than happy to have Intel come into more markets, and attempt to push everyone to improve, even themselves.
    Reply
  • drakefyre
    irish_adamerrr what? the last thing we need is intel dominating another market. At some point we do need to move away from x86 as Intel pretty much hold all the cards for it and refuses to licence it anymore. I'm pretty sure AMD and VIA are the only ones that have one, neither of which have the money or resources to present a challenge to Intel hence why they have a monopolyAs long as there is competition, the consumer will benefit. Even if Intel does put out a better product I'm very confident that there will be very strong competition for quite a while.
    Reply
  • mayankleoboy1
    More competition is always good. If nothing, it will make the lower end QC chips uncomfortable. possibly forcing QC to bump up specs on all chips.
    Win-Win for consumers.
    Reply