Samsung 850 SSD Review

Early Verdict

The 850 only has a three-year warranty, so it's downstream from the 850 EVO, but that doesn't mean it's a replacement for the 650 or 750 EVO. The 850's performance is very high for the 128GB-class, but that's standard issue for Samsung SSDs.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Samsung SATA (high) performance

  • +

    Low cost

  • +

    Support for Magician and Rapid Mode

  • +

    Consistent performance

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Limited availability

  • -

    Single and low capacity (at the time of writing)

  • -

    Reduced warranty compared to 850 EVO

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Samsung's 64-Layer 3D V-NAND Comes To The Desktop

We found Samsung's unannounced new 850 SSD and couldn't resist the chance to take it for a spin. We've seen Samsung's new 64-layer 3D V-NAND in the T5 portable SSD, but the 850 marks its retail debut in a drive designed specifically for the desktop PC. Samsung claims its 64-layer TLC V-NAND is faster and more reliable than previous generations, so the company is overhauling its entire product stack as it brings its latest flash to market.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • revanchrist
    Would like to know more about the rumored 4TB QLC drive from Samsung.
    Reply
  • DerekA_C
    ha shortage my BUTT it's a cash cow right now as everyone is trying to switch over so why not make a few extra billion of gullible people just like everything else the fabs the money the time and investment is already there for years yet prices hiked bogusly, no one can convince me otherwise same with the GAS shortage all a bunch of BS to make extra billions to screw the population over PERIOD. Oh just like the LCD TV panel shortage HA then 4 companies including Samsung sued for 1 billion for strong holding the market. Practice as usual the elite finding new ways to make themselves more rich and powerful.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    So how is this new and different from the current 850 EVO drives?
    This, from my existing 850 EVO:
    Yes, mine is a 500GB vs the test subject of 128GB, but just because there is a different TLA at the end of the model number does not make it 'better'.
    Reply
  • zodiacfml
    Not bad. I could use one but I bought 250GB EVO just a few days ago to match a 4TB HDD
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Please try to report the power-off data retention time of SSDs you review. As bits are being packed more densely, I suspect this number is falling and might already be low enough to cause issues for some people. For one MLC SSD I own, it's just 3 months.
    Reply
  • jeffs7897
    Uh....that would take...TIME. We would be reading this test next year.
    Reply
  • Jeffs0418
    20426654 said:
    Please try to report the power-off data retention time of SSDs you review. As bits are being packed more densely, I suspect this number is falling and might already be low enough to cause issues for some people. For one MLC SSD I own, it's just 3 months.
    How does one determine Power-off data retention time without TIME? That would fall under the Long-Term test.

    Reply
  • mapesdhs
    Would be interesting to see how this compares to the old 840 and 840 Pro, and indeed the 830, see whether the competition has at least caught up to those older models (excluding the 840 EVO, too many issues with performance degradation over time).
    Reply
  • fanafirmino
    Must I endure a video of someone playing games everytime I hit your homepage??? Come on, there must be another way, guys!
    Reply
  • bit_user
    20428005 said:
    20426654 said:
    Please try to report the power-off data retention time of SSDs you review.
    How does one determine Power-off data retention time without TIME? That would fall under the Long-Term test.
    It should be specified by the manufacturer, as in the case of my Intel drive. If it's not in the datasheet, then I would like the author to contact the manufacturer and ask them what it is. This will also hopefully send the message that people care about this attribute, and perhaps they'll be more mindful of it.
    Reply