ATI Radeon 4800 Launch Details

We previously published several details about AMD’s next-generation graphics card lineup and as we get closer to the launch we are getting more details about the launch date, feature set and prices. The good news: The new boards will come with “physics processing capability” and prices that will start below $200 for a 512 MB board. The bad news: The 4800 series will launch after Nvidia’s GT200.

Yes, we know, we previously said that the 4800 series would launch in May, but as it stands right now, we won’t be seeing the first new cards until mid-June. According To AMD’s current introduction schedule, the Radeon 4800 series will launch in week 25, which puts the day of the introduction somewhere between June 15 and June 22. What is significant about this time frame is that ATI will trail Nvidia and their new high-end chip GT200.

This comes as a major surprise, because it was widely expected that ATI will debut its RV770 chip first, followed by Nvidia’s summer part. But as it stands right now, Nvidia has the pole position in a new round of the graphics wars. Of course, the GT200 and RV770 are actually not entirely comparable, because of their huge price difference. But performance-wise, we’re in for a possibly close race.

The Radeon 4850, code-named “Makedon,” is AMD’s launch board. The name, by the way, is likely to refer to Terry "Catalyst" Makedon, group manager for software and video in the AMD (ATI) graphics division. Of course, there is a small chance that Alexander Makedonski (Alexander the Great) may have influenced the naming, but somehow we feel that Terry has won this time.

AMD will follow up in July and launch the Radeon 4870 512 MB GDDR5 and the 4870 X2 1024 MB GDDR5 (R700). The Radeon 4870 chip is built onto a board codenamed “Trojan” (could be named after a condom brand or a horse; we pick the latter) and comes with a dual-slot cooler, following the tradition of earlier XX70 boards. Our previous information about the memory buffer was a bit inaccurate, since the cost of Qimonda’s GDDR5 memory apparently was not compatible with the targeted pricing of these cards. The 4870 includes 512MB GDDR5 memory and surpasses upcoming Nvidia cards in terms of bandwidth. However, if any ATI partner wants to build a 1024 MB GDDR5 board, ATI will not say no, we were told. But don’t expect this to happen until early fall, since everybody wants to move as many units as possible.

Every aspect of the GPU is monitored by PowerPlay, since ATI will be very aggressive on the power side: The boards have been designed with power in mind and the 4850/4870 won’t require 8+6-pin combinations (exception: The dual-GPU 4870 X2). Power supply requirements call for a 450 watt unit for a single card and a 550 watt version for two cards. Given the fact that ATI has to state this for PoS power supplies, CrossFire should do just fine with a top notch 400 watt power supply.

TOPICS
  • xx12amanxx
    AWW i thought it was coming out this month..lol Oh well i can wait a month or soo. ATI these card's better be good!
    Reply
  • Sunfighterlc
    Seems ATI is trying for the bang for the buck shoppers vs going all out to try to take a performance crown. Maybe a good idea.
    Reply
  • scooterlibby
    "According To AMD’s current introduction schedule, the Radeon 4800 series will launch in week 25, which puts the day of the introduction somewhere between June 15 and June 22. What is significant about this time frame is that ATI will trail Nvidia and their new high-end chip GT200."

    I am confused. I thought, at the earliest, the GT200 would be coming out in July. If the 4800 series launches in June, and the high end 9900 in July, how would teh 4800 trail the GT200?
    Reply
  • xtkxhom3r
    well i hope these cards are good cus im going to b getting one at launch
    Reply
  • mf_fm
    i been supporting graphzilla (Nvidia) for a while, after ATi's 98xx series, now i believe it is time for a change.

    Change is what we need, since i bought 2x 7900GTX run in SLi back couple years, i kind of regret my decision. whooping out close to USD$1k, and it didn't really give me the vibe i wanted or intended to make. (at lease i can't play Crysis Max of everything)

    plus it hurts every time when you start thinking of building a new system.

    from now on, i will just keep it simply, 1 single 4870 priced @ USD$199~250, thats a WOW!! then i can buy a brand new design the following year or upgrade.

    i will never pay any cards priced over USD$300, NOT A DIME MORE.

    trust me people, i am not alone down on this road, and i warn you, NO NEED, theres no such a game need that bullsh!t setting but "Crysis", thats why no one plays it.
    Reply
  • terror112
    Nooooooooo......... I am sick of waiting for a successor to my 8800GTS320. I've been waiting for over a year and no card has yet been able to justify an upgrade. Cant wait any longer!!!
    Reply
  • korsen
    The GPU market is already a circus. Sure, Nvidia can't compete pricewise, but ONCE AGAIN, ATI is late to the party even after AMD had to shed some of it's top brass. As far as we're concerned, if Nvidia beats ATI in performance, we don't care what the card costs - Nvidia will win again. Sure you might be able to buy two ATI cards for the price, and maybe a bit more performance of the high end Nvidia card, but I guarantee you, for the 3rd generation in a row, ATI will look incredible on paper and will get slaughtered by real-world data.
    the 2900's were failures - the 3800's were failures - and now the 4800's will be failures as well because nvidia jacked up it's stream processors. An 8800GTX annihilates almost all of it's direct competitions which include crossfire setups - double it's stream processors and you're looking at a Quad-crossfire killer.

    AMD merging with ATI must've mixed up the dumbest of all possible people into positions of power, and all the bookies at AMD eventually go, "WERE BLEEDING CASH! THROW EVERYTHING WE'VE GOT ON THE MARKET!!!"

    It's called TESTING AMD. DO SOME.

    See, I bet you if AMD doubled it's stream processors, and tripled everything else (excluding clock speeds) it would cost more for them to make but they'd have Nvidia clamoring to hand out all the "Heads vs Asses" manuals. We all know AMD needs to find their own manuals right now...
    Reply
  • wrazor
    Korsen please stop taking Nvidia's side ffs. You say 3800s were failure?? What is your defination for failure then. The price range and consumer target of these cards applauded the 3800s and were very well recieved. Ofcourse almost 6 months later only 9600gt came from the green ones to compete vs the 3800s.I am not saying that the 4800s are gauranteed to be godly, but if they are 50% better than the 3800s, they justify being the next generation cards.........unlike nvidia.I dont care who makes the top card......because really its sub-300$ market that matters to me and most ppl apart from 5% ppl who want the best.
    Reply
  • The_Blood_Raven
    I'm in a position that if ATI's high-end card can get close to or even higher than Nvidia's high-end then Ill go for it, the problem is that, that is unlikely. I am one of those "5%" that are willing to spend a lot on graphics, call me crazy but I only limit myself to $1000 for an upgrade from my 7600 GT, lol. The problem is that Nforce boards are junk and I would absolutely love to scrap mine for an X38, but ATI is going to cover their asses as best they can and go for the price/performance market, problem being that Nvidia has proven time and time again that they can produce the top of the line card, then a month later produce a card that out performs ATI's for less. It is not that Nvidia is superior, it is that Nvidia has larger funds at the moment. ATI is going to bury themselves unless they can hold the top of the line performance crown for awhile, even if it costs a lot. So produce the 4850, 4870, and 4870 X2 then come out with something else that will destroy the 9900 top of the line, regardless of price, and see how quickly it all changes to "ATI is on top again!"
    Reply
  • Graphic market share percentage

    >>>>
    And Intel shows us the GREATEST graphic performance, right??? LOL
    Reply