- Intel's CPU Heat Gets Watered Down
- Intel's 925XE: Does Beating the 1 GHz FSB Barrier Matter?
- AthlonXP Underclocking for a Low-Power Fix
- AMD's Opteron 250 vs. Intel's Xeon 3.6 GHz in a Workstation Duel of...
- Performance Injection: Socket 423 with 2.8 GHz
- Duron Successor: AMD Sempron
- AMD's Socket 939 Offers More with Much of the Same
- Getting More Bang Out of Your Dual Processing Buck
- P4 Northwood and Prescott Comparison at 4.1 GHz
- Overclocking En Extremus: Athlon 64 FX 2.9 GHz, P4 EE 4.0 GHz
- Phenom as good or better than Intel in gaming?
- Why are there 5 different kinds of AMD CPUs?????
- So Sick of Fanbois
- AMD pushes out three more triple-core chips!!
- Build Now or Wait for Nehalem?
- Should I air or water cool my gaming rig?-Please help!
- AMD X4 9850BE(2.5GHZ) VS INTEL QUAD Q9650(3.0GHZ) FASTER??
- AMD Athlon 64 overclock?
- Upgrading my computer to overclock; what do I need and how do I do it?
- OCing the 5400+ BE
AMD's Athlon64 4000 and FX-55: Nails in the P4 EE's Coffin? : The Athlon64 4000+ Comes To Market
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: amd
Topics: AMD/ATI, NVIDIA
Syndication:
The Athlon64 4000+ Comes To Market

Four months after the introduction of AMD's Socket 939 platform, AMD latest processor crop is here. Only a week after Intel's announcement to drop plans of hitting 4 GHz any time soon, AMD now tries to hit Intel where it hurts with an even faster and architecturally improved device. AMD's latest processor performance success is also based on how AMD, with its Athlon64 4000+ and FX-55 launches, still manages to wring more performance out of its 130 nm process. This is also after Intel switched to 90 nm in February.
The 2.6 GHz Athlon64 FX-55 and the Athlon64 4000+ represent AMD's latest processor launch since the debut of the 2.4 GHz FX-53. However, the 4000+'s benchmarks are identical to those of the FX-53. Does the Athlon64 thus merit its 4000+ label?
One interpretation is that AMD is now setting the shortly-lived performance standards in the AMD and Intel processor performance wars. With the Athlon64 3800+ the chip firm introduced a QuantiSpeed rating that exceeded the clock speed of Intel's fastest processor for the first time. Now, the 4000+ sets another landmark that can be considered a serious challenge for Intel.
Additionally, AMD is phasing in its 90 nm Winchester cores, which are really shrunken Newcastle cores with a 512 kB L2 cache.
AMD is also making the move with considerably less fanfare than when Intel shifted to its 90 nm production process. The company will also initially use the high-volume process to make its lower-speed devices. The downside of AMD's quiet shift to 90 nm is that you will have to study the data sheets in order to tell the 130 nm and 90 nm versions apart as the processors' packaging and documentation will not make the distinction.
Since AMD's 90 nm Athlon64 3500+ is rated at 67 W, while the 130 nm part consumed a maximum of 89 W, we expect the new core to be able to finally hit the 3 GHz barrier within six months. However, the race to 3 GHz also depends on how fast Intel can get back on the high-clock speed road again, and entice AMD to offer even faster processors.
- Next page Facts On AMD64 Processors