At the time of purchase, PC gamers need to know what the best GPU for the money is. And if you don’t have the time to research the benchmarks, fear not, we've compiled a simple up-to-date list of the best GPUs for gaming at the most popular resolutions, virtual reality, and eSports.
MORE: Best Deals
Best GPUs For Gaming
Update 7/10/2017: replaced AMD Radeon RX 580 with Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060.
-
AMD Radeon RX 460Best eSports & HD
-
- GPU
- Polaris 11 (GCN 4.0)
-
- Process
- 14nm
-
- Shader Units
- 896
-
- Texture Units
- 56
-
- ROPs
- 16
-
- Core Clock
- 1090 MHz
-
- Memory Clock
- 7 GT/s
-
- Memory Bus
- 128-bit
-
- Memory Bandwidth
- 112 GB/s
-
- Memory Capacity
- 2GB / 4GB
-
- 3D APIs
- DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.5, Vulkan
-
- TDP
- 75W
-
- Power Connections
- 1x 6-pin
-
- Power Supply
- 300W
-
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060Best FHD | Good QHD
-
- GPU
- Pascal (GP106)
-
- Process
- 16 nm
-
- Shader Units
- 1280
-
- Texture Units
- 80
-
- ROPs
- 48
-
- Core Clock
- 1506 MHz
-
- Memory Clock
- 2000 MHz GDDR5
-
- Memory Bus
- 192-bit
-
- Memory Bandwidth
- 192 GB/s
-
- Memory Capacity
- 6 GB
-
- 3D APIs
- DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.5, Vulkan
-
- TDP
- 120 W
-
- Power Connections
- 1x 6-pin PCIe
-
- Power Supply
- 400 W
-
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070Best QHD | Good VR
-
- GPU
- Pascal (GP104)
-
- Process
- 16 nm
-
- Shader Units
- 1920
-
- Texture Units
- 160
-
- ROPs
- 64
-
- Core Clock
- 1506 MHz
-
- Memory Clock
- 2000 MHz GDDR5
-
- Memory Bus
- 256-bit
-
- Memory Bandwidth
- 256 GB/s
-
- Memory Capacity
- 8 GB
-
- 3D APIs
- DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.5, Vulkan
-
- TDP
- 150 W
-
- Power Connections
- 1x 8-pin PCIe
-
- Power Supply
- 500 W
-
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080Good 4K | Best VR
-
- GPU
- Pascal (GP104)
-
- Process
- 16 nm
-
- Shader Units
- 2560
-
- Texture Units
- 160
-
- ROPs
- 64
-
- Core Clock
- 1607 MHz
-
- Memory Clock
- 2500 MHz GDDR5X
-
- Memory Bus
- 256-bit
-
- Memory Bandwidth
- 256 GB/s
-
- Memory Capacity
- 8 GB
-
- 3D APIs
- DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.5, Vulkan
-
- TDP
- 180 W
-
- Power Connections
- 1x 8-pin PCIe
-
- Power Supply
- 500 W
-
-
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 TiBest 4K
-
- GPU
- Pascal (GP102)
-
- Process
- 16nm
-
- Shader Units
- 3584
-
- Texture Units
- 224
-
- ROPs
- 88
-
- Core Clock
- 1480 MHz
-
- Memory Clock
- 11 Gb/s
-
- Memory Bus
- 352-bit
-
- Memory Bandwidth
- 484 GB/s
-
- Memory Capacity
- 11GB GDDR5X
-
- 3D APIs
- DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.5, Vulkan
-
- TDP
- 250W
-
- Power Connections
- 1x 8-pin & 1x 6-pin PCIe
-
- Power Supply
- 600W
-
MORE: Desktop GPU Performance Hierarchy Table
MORE: All Graphics Content
June 2017 Updates
In the weeks since our last Best Graphics Cards update, Nvidia introduced two new products targeting the very top and very bottom of the add-in board market.
Its Titan Xp replaced Titan X (Pascal) at a $1200 price point. More than anything, Titan Xp “fixes” the aberration of a $700 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti outperforming Nvidia’s priciest desktop offering in many games. It shares the 1080 Ti’s complement of outputs (three DisplayPort and one HDMI), yet recycles the original Titan X’s fan shroud.
Under the hood, Titan Xp employs a complete GP102 processor with 3840 CUDA cores, 240 texture units, 96 ROPs, and a 384-bit aggregate pathway to 12GB of GDDR5X. Nvidia even shoots for the 1080 Ti’s typical GPU Boost clock rate, adding overclocked memory to carve out whatever advantage it can get. As we showed in our Nvidia Titan Xp 12GB Review, though, the new flagship only averages about 8% faster than its predecessor across our benchmark suite at 2560x1440 and 9.5% at 3840x2160.
Given GeForce GTX 1080 Ti’s position between Titan X and Titan Xp, along with its much more palatable price, that card retains its recommendation. Titan Xp leads the Pascal-based portfolio in spirit, but doesn’t do enough to earn our approval.
Separately (and without fanfare of any sort), Nvidia also introduced the GeForce GT 1030. It’s based on a GP108 processor and armed with 384 CUDA cores, 24 texture units, eight ROPs, and a 64-bit memory bus. Naturally, board vendors specify a range of frequencies, but the official GPU Boost rating is 1468 MHz. Two gigabytes of 6 GT/s GDDR5 appears standard.
We don’t yet know how GeForce GT 1030 sizes up against Radeon RX 550 - Nvidia isn’t keen on sending out samples. However, the company does pin a 30W power target on its entry-level offering. That’s quite a bit lower than AMD’s 50W ceiling. Nvidia also takes the lead on pricing: GT 1030 currently sells for ~$70, whereas RX 550s start at $80 and quickly reach $85 and $90.
Fortunately for AMD, there are still Radeon RX 460 cards starting at $80 and $90. At that price, we’d rather spend a little extra on the 896-shader board and have the opportunity to turn up detail settings a little. These probably won’t last much longer, so we’ll eventually have to choose between AMD’s and Nvidia’s modern entry-level options. But until then, the Radeon RX 460 retains our base-level recommendation for e-sports and HD gaming.
So long as you’re willing to dial down the details a bit at 1920x1080, there’s still room in our line-up for Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, one step up from the Radeon RX 460. This recommendation does not change. For the folks wondering why 1050 Ti looks good to us now, when it wasn’t a hit in our launch coverage, remember that RX 460 was selling for ~$110 back then. Today’s less expensive RX 460 gives the Radeon a win against 1050, while 1050 Ti’s slightly higher performance and 4GB of GDDR5 memory make it a better choice for gamers looking to push 1920x1080.
Availability of Radeon RX 570 and 580 cards has all but dried up, disturbingly enough. There’s nothing on Newegg, and the prices on Amazon are unrealistically high. Consequently, at least for this month, Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1060 6GB reclaims its recommendation for great 1080p and good 1440p frame rates. You’ll find plenty of them selling for $245 and up. Of course, we’ll revisit this critical performance point next month in hope of renewed competition (and word of the still-elusive Radeon RX Vega).
MORE: AMD Radeon RX 480 Roundup
MORE: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 Roundup
MORE: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 Roundup
MORE: Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Roundup
Best @ 720p & eSports
AMD’s Radeon RX 460 is now available for less than $100. At that price, it makes a great entry point for gamers on a budget, becoming our top choice for HD and eSports titles. You can even expect solid performance at 1920x1080 at relaxed quality settings.
At the heart of Radeon RX 460 is AMD’s Polaris 11 GPU, code-named Baffin. Fourteen compute units enable 896 Stream processors and 56 texture units in a three-billion-transistor chip. Our review sample came with 4GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus. But the least-expensive models only give you 2GB. We’re not worried—at HD and FHD resolutions, running out of memory shouldn’t be a problem.
AMD says its RX 460’s board power dips under 75W. However, the cards we’ve seen come equipped with six-pin connectors. Just be sure your PSU is ample before picking a partner board.
MORE: Best Builds
MORE: Best Cases
Good @ 1080p
It took us a while to warm to the 1050 Ti. After all, it costs quite a bit more than Nvidia’s vanilla 1050 and isn’t a whole lot faster. But this next step up over the RX 460 opens the door to a better-looking experience using high or medium quality settings at 1920x1080. Beating it with an AMD product means shopping for a Radeon RX 570 and paying at least $65 more - if you can find one in stock.
This is one of two cards based on Nvidia’s GP107 processor. The other one, GeForce GTX 1050, takes the full 768-core GPU and loses two SMs, ending up with 640 CUDA cores. So, paying a little extra for the Ti gets you more compute resources, plus an additional 2GB of GDDR5 memory.
Nvidia seemed determined to get us review samples that didn’t need auxiliary power. Exercise caution as you shop though, particularly if you’re upgrading an older PC or building a compact HTPC, as some models do come equipped with six-pin connectors.
MORE: Best Cooling
MORE: Best CPUs
Best @ 1080p | Good @ 1440p
Given rising prices and general unavailability of AMD’s Radeon RX 570 and 580 cards, we turn to Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1060 6GB as our choice for great 1080p and good 1440p performance.
There was never anything wrong with the 1060, per se. It was simply more expensive than the Radeon competition. Once AMD’s RX 580 launched, Nvidia’s mainstream solution wasn’t even consistently faster. But it is fairly easy to find right now, and we have to take that into consideration when we revise our recommendations each month.
You’ll find two versions of the GTX 1060, both based on the GP106 GPU. Make sure you’re shopping for the 6GB model, which features 1280 CUDA cores, 80 texture units, and 48 ROPs.
MORE: Best Gaming Laptops
MORE: Best Memory
Best @ 1440p & SLI | Good @ VR
The GeForce GTX 1070 is armed with 1920 CUDA cores, 120 texture units, and 8GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus. What’s more, a 150W TDP keeps the 1070’s power requirements conservative: Nvidia recommends a 500W PSU with one eight-pin connector.
But performance is what makes this card special. If you really want to max out quality at 2560x1440, the GTX 1070 is compelling. It’s significantly faster than the Radeon R9 Fury X in DirectX 11 games, and it holds its own against AMD’s Fiji-based GPUs in newer DirectX 12/Vulkan titles. We have a really hard time jumping from last month’s Radeon RX 580 recommendation to a $390+ GTX 1070 at 2560x1440. But AMD’s cards aren’t readily available, so they concede our mid-range recommendation to Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1060 6GB. A GTX 1070 is the most logical step up from there.
We're also sticking with the GeForce GTX 1070 as our recommendation for playable performance on Oculus’ Rift and HTC’s Vive. While you could still get away with previous-gen GPUs, Nvidia’s Pascal architecture includes a lot of optimization for VR. The GTX 1060 isn’t quite fast enough for our liking in fast-paced VR games, so the 1070 earns recognition instead.
MORE: Best Monitors
MORE: Best Motherboards
Good @ 4K | Best @ VR
Up until recently, Titan X was top-of-the-line. But it also set you back $1200. Now we can recommend the GTX 1080 at its new $500 price point for playable 4K frame rates and the $700 1080 Ti for maxed-out quality settings.
The GP104-based 1080 wields 2560 CUDA cores, 160 texture units, and 8GB of GDDR5X on a 256-bit bus. Its performance is rivaled only by Nvidia's GP102-based boards, and yet it's rated for just 180W.
MORE: Best Power Supplies
MORE: Best SSDs
Best @ 4K
The Titan X (Pascal) introduced gamers to brutal speed, but at an equally devastating $1200 price tag. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti brings roughly the same frame rates down to $700, securing our recommendation for the best 4K performance available from a single-GPU solution.
Its GP102 processor is the same one found on Titan X. You get the same 3584 CUDA cores and 224 texture units. But Nvidia shaves off one 32-bit memory controller, eight ROPs, and 256KB of L2 cache. To compensate, the chip’s base clock rate is set to 1480 MHz. And the use of 11 Gb/s GDDR5X actually lends 1080 Ti more theoretical memory bandwidth than Titan X with its 10 Gb/s modules.
These days, partner cards abound. If you’re willing to go with Nvidia’s reference design, we’ve even seen Founders Edition boards selling in the $670 range.
MORE: Best Virtual Reality Headsets
GPU market is pretty lame and expensive atm imo. I'm sitting on 7950+ (clocks almost like 7970) which I got ~2years ago for 120eur used (I guess it was after some bitcoin/mining bubble or something) which replaced my aging 4870. Now if I would want to get similar boost I need to get something between 1060-1070 but even lame 1060 3GB goes 200e used , which is almost twice the amount I paid 2 years ago for bigger boost
I don't know what will be better, if Vega is really that good and pushes prices down on whole spectrum or another mining bubble burst which will flood market with GPUs...