System Builder Marathon, March 2012: $650 Gaming PC

Benchmark Results: Crysis And Just Cause 2

Crysis

At High detail levels, the current PC is quite CPU-limited, and there isn't much performance to be had by overclocking the graphics hardware. December's build at its stock settings matches today's best effort all the way through 1680x1050. Meanwhile, its significantly overclocked Radeon HD 6870 maintains a slight lead through 1920x1080.

Crysis at Very High detail settings is a measuring stick of sorts for the seriousness of our little budget system, and the Radeon HD 6870 is about as mainstream as you'd want to go at 1920x1080. This quarter's machine is much more processor-bound at 1280x720 than its predecessor, but increasing resolution quickly shift demands over to the graphics hardware. The 3-6 FPS advantage held by this quarter's PC may not look significant, especially since most folks would be happy with either rig at these settings. But gamers with more exacting demands may find it necessary to turn down details on the Radeon HD 6870 in order to get through taxing levels like Paradise Lost. We'll call that a victory for today's machine.

Just Cause 2

Our first results from Just Cause 2 resemble what we saw in Crysis. The Core i3-2120 inhibits performance at lower resolutions, though demands shift over to the graphics card as the screen size goes up.

Enabling 8x AA at the highest detail levels loads up our graphics cards. At anything higher than 1280x1024, the Radeon HD 6870 falls behind. Despite what would seem like marginal results, actually playing around in the game’s lush foliage and the Panau City financial district confirmed that an overclocked Radeon HD 6870 is indeed capable of 8xAA at 1920x1080. Frame rates int he game itself rarely dipped below the average reported by the Concrete Jungle benchmark.

The current PC fared even better when we maxed it out at 1920x1080. As we explored demanding areas in the game world, frame rates varied between 50 and 60 FPS, only briefly dropping below 40 FPS during intense explosions. When we factor in overclocking, both platforms are playable at our target settings.

  • yukijin
    so now that all the 6950's are deactivated or $289+, is this build invalid? because a 7850 is looking really good right now...
    Reply
  • tristan_b
    What yukijin said.
    Reply
  • whysobluepandabear
    I appreciate what they're doing, but at some points, I can't help but feel like a cheap bitch.

    Making decisions overly measly amounts of money ($10) is just dumb. Work an extra day and just get the hardware you want. Or, don't go to the movies or out to eat for a few weeks.

    To me, there's a certain area, at which being cheap, just rips you off - you'd be better off spending a little more, and getting a much better item.
    Reply
  • How do I win this????
    Reply
  • mortsmi7
    Let me get this straight... you raised the budget $150 "as a result of steep price hikes on mechanical storage", then only spent $85 on a HDD. You really just wanted a more expensive graphics card. You could have taken the $70 processor savings and the $65 under-budget HDD savings and nearly have had a $500 build.
    Reply
  • de5_Roy
    very good read.
    nice to see where core i3's limits lie.
    i wonder if you guys will consider amd's new fx 6200 or fx 8120 for the $1200 build, with 78xx series in cfx.
    Reply
  • serhat359
    if I had $600 for a PC, I would go with i3-21xx, 6870, a better mobo and a better case.
    it is probably the best thing to do
    Reply
  • SpadeM
    whysobluepandabearI appreciate what they're doing, but at some points, I can't help but feel like a cheap bitch. Making decisions overly measly amounts of money ($10) is just dumb. Work an extra day and just get the hardware you want. Or, don't go to the movies or out to eat for a few weeks. To me, there's a certain area, at which being cheap, just rips you off - you'd be better off spending a little more, and getting a much better item.It's not an issues of whether they had the money or not, it's a matter of principle, you set your budget and goals at a certain point and then you make choices. Sure, not everyone will be happy with what they chose but that's what forums are for.

    Anyways, anything a bit over 60fps (on a 60hz monitor) really isn't that bad, i mean you might lack the bragging rights but at the end of the day, it's about gaming and feeling satisfied that you shot enough monsters. To further empathize that having 70 fps constant is not total shit because another GPU can serve you 130 (as if you're going to notice without watching the fps counter) my one suggestion for this SBM would be to introduce a different style of graphs. Below 30fps all the colors of the bars to be grey and over 60 the same thing. This to focus the attention on most relevant (to my opinion) segment. I've seen a lot of ppl chase those fps numbers, buying expensive GPUs only to have them sit in a bad enclosure, sub par motherboard or weak CPU.
    Even in gaming, i believe balance is key.
    Reply
  • confish21
    Great Job! These builds keep me at Tomshardware!

    Only thing 1 thing, you said an I3 was used instead of an I5 on this page...
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/build-gaming-pc-overclock,3159-8.html
    You can check the 600 dec build here...
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i5-overclock-performance-gaming,3097.html
    Pretty sure an I5-2400 was used.
    Reply
  • jerreddredd
    I'm glad they used a i3 2120 for the CPU, but I wish they would have used some of the newer cards like the HD 7950 or the GTX 560 Ti 448. these are roughly the same price. Spending and extra $20 on a PSU was a waste. the EA430D and 380W are the core of the budget build. I would like to see some testing of a few of the less expensive PSU ($50 or less) to see which are junk and which aren't bad.
    Reply