Three PCI Express-Based SSDs: When SATA 6 Gb/s Is Too Slow
Table of contents
- 1. PCI Express-Powered Storage By Fusion-io, LSI, OCZ
- 2. PCI Express Storage Concepts
- 3. Fusion-io ioDrive (160/112 GB) And ioXtreme (80 GB)
- 4. LSI WarpDrive Acceleration Card SLP-300 (300 GB)
- 5. OCZ Ibis (240 GB)
- 6. New AS SSD Benchmark
- 7. Test Procedure And Access Time Results
- 8. Benchmark Results: Database And File Server I/O Performance
- 9. Benchmark Results: Web Server And Workstation I/O Performance
- 10. Benchmark Results: 4 KB Random Reads/Writes
- 11. Benchmark Results: AS SSD Copy Testing
- 12. Benchmark Results: AS SSD Sequential Read/Write
- 13. Benchmark Results: AS SSD Read/Write And Total Score
- 14. Benchmark Results: PCMark Vantage
- 15. Compression Test: Fusion-io ioDrive And ioXtreme
- 16. Compression Test: LSI WarpDrive SLP-300
- 17. Compression Test: OCZ Ibis
- 18. Conclusion
When it comes time to hunt down the ultimate in storage performance, you simply cannot settle for standard SSDs. Instead, look to PCI Express-based drives that circumvent the limitations of SATA. We have products from Fusion-io, LSI, and OCZ on the bench.
SSD vendors are all in the middle of transitioning from 3 Gb/s to 6 Gb/s interface speeds, which effectively doubles the available interface speed on solid state drives. But if you think that achieving 500 MB/s is fast you should think again. Flash-based storage can be made to move data much faster than that once it is no longer limited by Serial ATA. Today we're comparing the latest offerings from Fusion-io, LSI, and OCZ to figure out who makes the fastest solid state drive available today. To do that, we must say goodbye to SATA and hello to PCI Express!
The idea behind the four products we compare in this article is simple: their creators want to maximize throughput, I/O performance, or both. Cost ends up being secondary on this venture. Fusion-io, LSI Corporation, and OCZ Technology all share a common opinion of the Serial ATA interface. Mainly, it's inadequate for a true high-performance product, as the bandwidth is limited to less than 600 MB/s on SATA 6Gb/s. Therefore, all of the products in this roundup center on PCI Express, which directly attaches flash storage to the fastest available system interface. With that said, this doesn’t mean that SATA cannot be used at all. In fact, both LSI and OCZ employ SATA to connect flash memory to their solutions internally.
The individual approaches on how to procure maximum performance differ a lot. While LSI and OCZ create cards that employ RAID-based configurations using multiple controllers attached to dedicated NAND flash, Fusion-io is the first and only firm to provide a direct PCI Express storage solution that doesn’t utilize an internal storage interface like SATA. Therefore, we decided to put the LSI WarpDrive and OCZ’s Ibis up against the ioDrive and the ioXtreme by Fusion-io.
As always, different implementations have their own unique pros and cons. As mentioned, LSI and OCZ access conventional RAID and storage controllers to create powerful devices, while Fusion-io created new silicon to minimize the number of interfaces that have to be involved. The latter appears to be the most elegant solution. But it's still not bootable. That might not be very important in enterprise environments, where lots of capacity and high performance is used to accelerate I/O-intensive workloads. It is a problem in the enthusiast space, though.
Be that as it may, in the end, we’re interested in understanding how each product is designed and how it works. And what matters most are the benchmark results, right? Let’s look at the ioDrive (160 GB) and ioXtreme (80 GB) by Fusion-io, the LSI WarpDrive Accelerator Card SLP-300 (300 GB), and OCZ's Ibis. The Ibis is technically very similar to the RevoDrive X2 that Chris reviewed in January 2011 (Ed.: And, in fact, I took an early look at the Ibis in OCZ's HSDL: A New Storage Link For Super-Fast SSDs, too).
Before we dive too deeply into this comparison, which may strike some readers as imbalanced based on the pricing of each product, it is important to consider the markets addressed by high-end PCI Express-based SSDs. The solutions sold by Fusion-io and LSI are clearly geared towards an enterprise audience. Their design, components, firmware, support and pricing are totally different from OCZ's Ibis and its more enthusiast/workstation-oriented specifications. The Ibis just happens to interface via PCI Express as well. To make a long story short, please don't take this review as a shootout, but as a look at different concepts and options. We think the conclusion reflects unique considerations for each dissimilar piece of hardware.
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Latest Internal Storage News
Latest Internal Storage reviews
- 02/09 – Momentus XT 750 GB Review: A Second-Gen Hybrid Hard Drive
- 02/06 – Intel SSD 520 Review: Taking Back The High-End With SandForce
- 02/01 – Upgrade Advice: Does Your Fast SSD Really Need SATA 6Gb/s?
- 01/26 – Install A Hard Drive Or SSD In Your Notebook's Optical Bay
- 01/24 – Best SSDs For The Money: January 2012


wow just wow, I want one so bad.
I want to see this comparison updated when Intel's 720 SSD arrives. Were Intel's listed speeds mere exaggeration?
The OCZ Revo and the Revo X2 drives have been available for a long time also the X3 has just been released,... IMO these should have been reviewed here too,...
i'm wondering how fast you can cold boot windows 7...
you really should have tested iodrive OCTAL. that would kick ass this shitty pci-e ssd's. Also you should have compared with ramdisks.
Ramdisks are orders of magnitude faster than any SSD available now. IoDrive is still very good despite it's age, the new ones are way faster.
that's all well and good but who cares?
http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30 [...] r-than-fl/
First page: "To make a long story short, please don't take this review as a shootout, but as a look at different concepts and options."
Last page: "Its performance is so impressive and so consistent across all of the benchmark categories that we have no choice but to declare the ioDrive this shootout's performance winner."
What?
I'm actually not too impressed. For how much these things currently cost, they should be 10x faster than current SATA SSDs. It looks like more like 3x though. Still nothing to laugh at, but I think they have a long way to go still.
you really should have tested iodrive OCTAL. that would kick ass this shitty pci-e ssd's. Also you should have compared with ramdisks.
Ramdisk speed are like 7000 mb/s + if i remmember... I doubt ssd or pci ssd will come close to a loyal benchmark.
SATA has no future, eventually will be replace with PCIe in some other maybe form of connector.
Is not possible to install games in a Fusion-io board? I´ve always thought it was possible to install the games on the Fusion-io and the OS on a standard SSD.
This test is seriously flawed. The LSI had 6 SSDs in RAID on one card. The ioDimms were stand-alone. They (ioDimms) scale linearly across all performance metrics as you raid them together. Stick an ioDuo drive in there and you will literally get twice the performance on a single slot (and beat your six raided drives in all metrics). Stick 2 duos in the PCIe bus and you will get 4x the performance. You can't do that with spinning disks and you can't do that with SSDs--you get diminishing returns and non-linearities. Can't boot? It doesn't matter so much. Keep all your caches, game files, applications, scratch disks, and indexes on the fusion cards and you'll be blown away. You should have pointed out how weak the LSI card was in reality. The larger capacity for that card was, in reality, multiple drives raided together on a single card. Big deal, you could do that with an ioOctal and have 8x performance over a single ioDimm. These other drives just don't stack up against the ioDimms. Agreed, the price point isn't for the enthusiast, but in an enterprise scenario, what you can do with an Fusion-io setup is simply amazing. Furthermore, you didn't even get into a discussion about how important latency is, or the wear life of the drives. Those are other places where Fusion-io is way way out in front FTW.
that's all well and good but who cares?http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/30 [...] r-than-fl/
Nice, but there are limitations on the theoretical limits of copper and current limitations on the pcie bus. It's all about how fast you can feed the processor and with how little latency. Yes, this is great, but it's how you deploy the technology on existing infrastructure that will matter (until that infrastructure catches up).
I'm actually not too impressed. For how much these things currently cost, they should be 10x faster than current SATA SSDs. It looks like more like 3x though. Still nothing to laugh at, but I think they have a long way to go still.
I agree. The speed is interesting but not what it should be. Im thinking these cards also need a large RAM cache to make use of the PCI bus speeds and then let the SSDs work in the background -just like the high performance hard drive cards do. The controllers dont seem to be optimized for PCI-bus level speeds.
No RAM cache is involved. You're either on the PCIe bus or not. Tom's has a diagram on one of these pages explaining the setup.
SATA has no future, eventually will be replace with PCIe in some other maybe form of connector.
LightPeak will replace SATA.
Nice, but there are limitations on the theoretical limits of copper and current limitations on the pcie bus. It's all about how fast you can feed the processor and with how little latency. Yes, this is great, but it's how you deploy the technology on existing infrastructure that will matter (until that infrastructure catches up).
Exactly. Not to mention in an non compressible truly random scenario, those Sandforce Controller wont be that much faster in Random Write. And all the funny things happen with Sandforce controller. Consistency is much more important. Fusion - IO truly wins this test with a technology that is now nearly 4 years old.
My PC boots up in 8 seconds to the password prompt. It's soooooo slowwwww..
$110.00 for a 60GB SATA2 Mushkin. 240MB/sec both ways. Really: I love it!
"Three PCI Express-Based SSDs: When SATA 6 Gb/s Is Too Slow"
Then why are you comparing these PCI Express SSD's to SATA @ 3 Gb/s?
Seriously big flaw in your tests here.
This is crazy to think SATA 6 will be slow on SSD, even the cheapest ssd is a lot faster than a HDD