ViewSonic XG2401 24-inch FreeSync Monitor Review

ViewSonic is the latest major display manufacturer to add FreeSync to its lineup. Today, we're testing the 24-inch XG2401. It's a FHD/TN screen with a 144Hz refresh rate and ultra-fast panel response.

There seems to be no shortage of premium gaming displays available with QHD resolution, high-end IPS panels and adaptive refresh. But not everyone wants to spend $600 and up on a monitor; especially if their video card is of the value-priced variety.

Thanks to FreeSync and an implementation that requires only DisplayPort 1.2 and no additional hardware, adaptive refresh can be added to an AMD-based system for an easier-to-live-with price. But don't think that means a free lunch. You will have to give up a few features if you want an optimized gaming experience for less than $350.

The two principal factors separating the expensive displays from inexpensive ones are resolution and panel tech. Naturally, more gamers want the 2560x1440 pixels of a QHD monitor. It doesn't take a thousand-dollar graphics board to drive most games to about 50fps at that density. But those extra dots will cost you at least $150 to $200 more. And if you want IPS instead of TN, plan on adding another $100 or so to the price tag.

If your max budget for an adaptive-refresh display is $300 (at this writing), you can figure on putting a 24-inch FHD/TN screen with FreeSync on your desktop. Today, we're checking out one such example from ViewSonic: the XG2401.

MORE: Best Computer Monitors
MORE: Display Calibration 101

MORE: The Science Behind Tuning Your Monitor
MORE: All Monitor Content

Yes the panel is FHD and TN, but we suggest putting any preconceived notions on hold until after you've seen our benchmark results. This is an extremely well-built monitor with class-leading contrast, excellent color accuracy and FreeSync right up to the panel's 144Hz maximum refresh rate.

The 48Hz end of the XG2401's range may be a concern to those who can't maintain framerates above that consistently. But since you're only pushing 1920x1080 pixels, it won't take an expensive video card to maintain speeds north of 60fps.

The backlight is a white LED in a flicker-free configuration. Rather than using pulse-width modulation, the XG2401 features constant current drive at all backlight levels. Very few people actually experience flicker but this arrangement ensures that no one will.

Aside from a solid chassis and nice styling, there aren't too many bells and whistles here. There's no blur-reduction feature but ViewSonic's overdrive implementation works reasonably well. You also get an input lag option that lowers processing overhead for faster response to inputs. It will net you about two milliseconds.

On paper, the XG2401 looks like a good value and a decent performer. Now that we have our hands on one, it's time to take a closer look.

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
15 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
  • darthtomas_admin
    1st lol. On the serious note, is the panel native 8-bit one? That contrast ratio looks too good to be true .....
    -4
  • Amdlova
    i need this!
    2
  • eklipz330
    48hz isn't optimal but it sure as hell is still damn good. 20hz would be perfect.

    freesync is kicking ASS. i hope nvidia continues to rest on their laurels as AMD picks up more market share and becomes a more formidable competitor.
    4
  • RockyPlays
    Buying this asap.
    2
  • karloe
    CONS: 48Hz lower FreeSync --> Christian, didn't you hear about Low Framerate Compensation?
    144 > 2,5x48 --> meaning LFC is on so the actual FreeSync range is 0-144Hz
    2
  • rantoc
    *yawn* Yet another low res 1080p....
    -9
  • ubercake
    Great contrast. Definitely a plus for gaming. If you have the goods to keep framerates above 48 consistently, this monitor looks like a catch.
    2
  • darthtomas_admin
    Christian, could you confirm screen part number ( is it real 8-bit one or 6-bit+dithering ) please.
    1
  • sillynilly
    Another low price monitor good for a low range gaming rig. Not my cup of tea, but cool that the market isn't abandoning the cheaper options for peeps that don't run the latest, greatest parts in their rigs.
    -4
  • slashdot
    Not sure why people diss the "low price monitor", but Freesync and Gsync needs to encompass a larger range of price point. Faster value adoption means paying less "premium" for Freesync/Gsnyc in the top range. Otherwise, adaptive sync would be niche tech that would die in a year and two, and the so-called "premium feature" would no longer be supported.
    3
  • ubercake
    Anonymous said:
    Not sure why people diss the "low price monitor", but Freesync and Gsync needs to encompass a larger range of price point. Faster value adoption means paying less "premium" for Freesync/Gsnyc in the top range. Otherwise, adaptive sync would be niche tech that would die in a year and two, and the so-called "premium feature" would no longer be supported.


    This is definitely a scary fact. If this goes away due to lack of demand/lack of creating demand due to high cost, it will be something we merely talk about as history in 5 years... e.g. Remember when?

    Nvidia needs to take the reigns and decide not to charge such a higher premium so they can get people hooked on the benefits of G-sync while AMD who originally said there would be no premium for FreeSync kind of fibbed. The mark up is definitely not as harsh as G-sync though it is still there.

    Both companies need to sell this tech to consumer TV manufacturers as well or it may very well die off though I sure hope not.
    1
  • Aslam_
    Anyone knows how this compares to the Aoc G2460pf or Acer Xf240h?
    1
  • jkhoward
    I love my FreeSync monitor.. I wouldn't trade it for the world.
    1
  • Thomas_123
    Quote:
    Anyone knows how this compares to the Aoc G2460pf or Acer Xf240h?


    The Acer XF240H has bad Colours and is still too bright for my Eyes, even with Brightness and Contrast set to 0!
    1
  • Aslam_
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Anyone knows how this compares to the Aoc G2460pf or Acer Xf240h?


    The Acer XF240H has bad Colours and is still too bright for my Eyes, even with Brightness and Contrast set to 0!

    Thanks. Asus has also just released the MG248Q. I guess this is the best of the 4 in terms of panel quality.
    1