Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Benchmark Settings

X48 Motherboard Comparison, Part 2
By
Benchmarks and Settings
3D-Games
Crysis Version: 1.1
Video Modes: 800x600 (low), 1920x1200 (high)
Video Quality: Low Details (low), Very High Details (high)
Anti-aliasing: Off (low), 8x (high)
Benchmark: Benchmark_CPU.bat
Supreme Commander Version: 3.220
Video Modes: 1024x768 (low), 1920x1200 (high)
Video Quality: Lowest Details (low), Highest Details (high)
Anti-aliasing: Off (low), 8x (high)
Graphics: Medium
Test Path: Options/Performance/Test Settings
Unreal Tournament 3 Version: 1.2 (Dual-Core Patch)
Video Modes: 640x480 (low), 1920x1200 (high)
Video Quality: Lowest Details (low), Highest Details (high)
Post Processing: Default (low), Intense (high)
Benchmark: 16-bot botmatch (war-marketdistrict)
Applications
Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus Version: 7.5.467
Virus Base: 269.6.1/776
Benchmark: Scanning 3.82GB Application Folder
Maxon Cinema 4D Version: 10.008
Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Benchmark: Rose Drop, 8-bits (50 Frames)
Adobe Photoshop CS3 Version: 10.0x20070321
Filtering from a 69 MB TIF-Photo
Benchmark: Tom’s Guide-Benchmark V1.0.0.4
Rarlab Winrar Version 3.70 BETA 8
Compression = Best
Dictionary = 4096 KB
Uncompressed Folder Size: 642MB
Video
TMPEGEnc 4.0 Xpress Version: 4.2.10.211
Import File: Terminator 2 SE DVD (2 Minutes)
Resolution: 720x576 (PAL) 16:9
Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Channel, English
Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160kb/s)
DivX 6.6 Version: 6.6.1
Profile: Home Theater Profile (720 x 576)
1-pass, 780 kb/s
Encoding mode: Insane Quality
Enhanced multithreading
XviD 1.1.2 Version: 1.1.2
Target quantizer: 1.00 (maximum quality)
Clone DVD 2 Version: 2.908
DVD "Terminator II SE" (English version)
Transcoding from DVD-9 to DVD-4.7
Audio: English Dolby AC-3/6 (surround) - DTS
Subtitles: None
Synthetics
SiSoftware Sandra XII Version 2008.4.14.20
Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark
Hard Drive Performance
Low Level Performance h2benchw 3.6 (by c’t Magazine)
I/O Performance IOMeter 2003.05.10
Fileserver Benchmark
Webserver Benchmark
Database Benchmark
Workstation Benchmark
Audio
Rightmark Audio Analyzer Version: 6.0.6
Stream Quality: 16 bits, 44.1 KHz
Display all 9 comments.
  • 5 Hide
    nihility , May 31, 2008 8:23 AM
    I thought the major concern with overclocking was doing it with 4 GB or 8 GB of memory installed and with quad cores.
    Buying an overly expensive high end motherboard but installing a 65 nm dual core processor and just 2 GB of RAM seems a very odd combination to me.
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , May 31, 2008 4:10 PM
    @ni

    Not so odd if you want to get the base foundation set up and then wait for lower prices on higher performance parts later on down the road.
    A quad core (3.0 GHz x 4) chip is coming down the pike by years end and DDR3 prices are on the slide. Building an E8400 / 2 GB base machine is exactly what I did to finally migrate from my 5 year old P4 Extreme Edition / Intel 875 based rig.

    That's the beauty of the X48 platform; longevity.
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , May 31, 2008 10:45 PM
    The ECS offering has supposedly been out for around a month, but I can't find it for sale ANYWHERE!! can't even find a price. I used to turn my nose up at ECS products. Our company used Asus boards exclusively thinking they were a higher quality product. Evey one of our Asus boards failed within 4 years. This may be because the Chinese have studied the American business model... Make a product that is designed to either fail or need parts within a calculated period of time. ECS are much cheaper, and so far seem more stable than the Maximus Formula board we purchased recently. The Asus BIOS is for people who like to toy with settings. Unfortunately their BIOS has become complicated beyond their programmers ability too write stable code.
  • 1 Hide
    Anonymous , June 1, 2008 4:09 AM
    Glad to see that gigabyte's board was so much more energy efficient than Asus', or any other board for that matter... especially while overclocking
  • 0 Hide
    Fedor , June 1, 2008 7:53 AM
    Arcolyte - lol. Did you fall asleep and dream up another page of the review which had power consumption whilst overclocking? :p 

    For the record I'm using my first Gigabyte board (X38-DQ6) and overall I'm pretty happy with it, but having said that I haven't used Asus in at least 5 years. With these comparisons it often comes down to features since performance is pretty near (although the low memory speeds achieved by the Gigabyte surprised me!).
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , June 1, 2008 3:19 PM
    " Intel covers all of its CPU VRM MOSFET?s with sinks. Our apologies for the alphabet soup that made up the last comment. " -> You could've gone with " Central Processing Unit Voltage Regulator Module Metal?Oxide?Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistor's " , so it's ok =)
  • 0 Hide
    frodbonzi , June 2, 2008 3:01 AM
    I wonder how the Asus' Rampage Formula stacks up here? It supports DDR2 or DDR3 and is part of the RoG line... X48 as well...
  • 0 Hide
    xanxaz , June 2, 2008 8:00 PM
    asrock rocks....lol...although i'll keep my gigabyte... as i dont know where to say this, it's better say it here... your main page is eating my cpu cycles... between 25% up to 50% cpu utilization while viewing your site? please cut down in animated ads... running a c2d at 3.6 and still lags while surfing... dah... it's just your site... os is it me? i think it's the ad on the top right corner that is causing that...
  • 0 Hide
    wozeus , June 16, 2008 5:54 PM
    I see that Newegg has ECS X48T-A for under $200. Looks like it's a great deal...going to get one.
React To This Article