Intel Details Its Bitcoin-Mining 'Bonanza Mine' Chips and 3,600-Watt Miner

Bonanza Mine

(Image credit: Intel)

At ISSCC 2022, Intel shared the deep-dive details of its new Bitcoin-mining Bonanza Mine ASICs and outlined how it melds 300 of these tiny power-efficient chips into a powerful 3,600W miner that delivers up to 40 THash/s of performance. [EDIT: We have since found the specifications and pricing for the newer model that is shipping to customers, which you can read about here.]

We first discovered Intel's Bonanza Mine ASICs in a listing for a presentation at the ISSCC 2022 conference, and the information below comes from the presentations at the event. This material covers the first generation of Intel's mining chips, known as BZM1, but the company has already moved on to its second-gen 'Bonanza Mine' ASIC, known as BZM2, that it is now making available to customers to challenge the likes of Bitmain and MicroBT.

After news of the company's efforts came to light, Intel finally officially acknowledged its blockchain/Bitcoin silicon program, divulging that it already has several large customers for the second-gen chips. That includes BLOCK (helmed by CEO Jack Dorsey of Twitter fame), Argo Blockchain, and GRIID Infrastructure.

Intel hasn't shared details of the second-gen chips and systems yet, but we do know they are derivatives of the BZM1 ASICs shown below. 

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • bluvg
    "Intel says these are 7nm ASICs, but doesn't specify if that is its own 'Intel 7,' the original 7nm before it renamed the process node to 'Intel 4,' or TSMC's 7nm process."

    Please, don't continue using "nm" as an actual measure. It hasn't been for a long time; it's now an extrapolation. Transistor density is a much more useful metric for comparison. Intel renamed its current process to Intel 7 because it is of analogous density to TSMS's N7 (note TSMC also doesn't label it "7nm").
    Reply
  • Kenneth Harden
    Please, for the love of all that is holy, let 'something else' (besides gaming GPUs) be the smart choice for mining and pull the rug out from under that market. Honestly, if this keeps up for too much longer it is going to start doing real damage to the PC gaming industry.

    I am thankful I have a 'pre crazy times' 2080 that is serving me well, but I constantly worry about what happens if it dies. Well I do have an old 760 sitting in a box!
    Reply
  • getoutmining
    Are you sure about those specs? 40TH at 3600W is poor. New Bitmain is 140TH at 3000W.
    Reply
  • Foulbelly
    getoutmining said:
    Are you sure about those specs? 40TH at 3600W is poor. New Bitmain is 140TH at 3000W.

    I was thinking the same thing.

    Bitmain's current flagship antminer s19pro is actually 110th/s @3250w. Canaan flagship Avalon 1246 runs 90th/s @ 3400w.

    Either way, the best offerings from Bitmain (s19p) and Canaan (a1246) absolutely blow the doors off of Intel's latest offering. Not sure what I'm missing here.... Intel has to increase their efficiency by 60% or more to come close to matching current iterations.
    Reply
  • Exploding PSU
    Kenneth Harden said:
    Please, for the love of all that is holy, let 'something else' (besides gaming GPUs) be the smart choice for mining and pull the rug out from under that market. Honestly, if this keeps up for too much longer it is going to start doing real damage to the PC gaming industry.

    I am thankful I have a 'pre crazy times' 2080 that is serving me well, but I constantly worry about what happens if it dies. Well I do have an old 760 sitting in a box!

    I hear you. If my Vega 56 dies my 970 would need to come out of retirement and start pumping frames again
    Reply