Intel's Second-Gen Bitcoin Miner's Performance and Pricing Listed, Leads the Market

Bonanza Mine

(Image credit: Intel Bonanza Mine Prototype)

Intel's entrance into the Bitcoin mining hardware market is undoubtedly disruptive, and given new information that has come to light, it now looks like the company's mining hardware could have the best price-to-performance ratio on the market. Intel recently presented its prototype chip and Bitcoin miner at a recent tech conference, but those models aren't the ones shipping to customers — the second-gen Bonanza Mine chips that are shipping to customers have remained shrouded in mystery. However, A recent SEC filing by one of Intel's premier partners has revealed both the pricing and performance of Intel's second-gen Bonanza Mine (BZM2) Bitcoin miners.

According to the listing, BZM2's performance weighs in at 135 TH/s with 26 J/THs of efficiency. Additionally, the miner is roughly half the cost of a competing Bitmain S19 Pro while being 15% more efficient, rivaling the best hardware on the market from competing companies.

News of Intel's Bitcoin-mining 'Bonanza Mine' chips originally filtered out without much fanfare via a listing for a tech conference presentation. Soon after, the discovery of an IPO filing by GRIID, a Bitcoin mining company that's among Intel's first customers, revealed some of the details of Intel's go-to-market strategy. Intel followed with its official announcement that it had entered the Bitcoin hardware business with three large customers in tow, and then finally showed its prototype Bonzanza Mine system at ISCC. That prototype system isn't competitive against today's systems, but now we know that Intel's shipping products actually either beat or challenge Bitmain and MicroBT, the market leaders.

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Historical Fidelity
    So this article contradicts itself. First it says that the intel miner is from a US manufacturer but then later says it’s manufactured on TSMC 5nm which is only found in Taiwan…..so which one is it? If GRIID is touting “US manufacturer” then it must be built on intel 7 in the US. Manufacturing it on TSMC 5nm would mean it is very susceptible to geopolitical risk. I mean I guess the author is saying the miner is assembled in the US from TSMC manufactured processors but that doesn’t minimize geopolitical risk….if China invaded Taiwan then you are still cut-off from all the important components. The only way to minimize risk is for intel to manufacturer the components and assemble the miner all in the US.
    Reply
  • Justin Goldberg
    Perhaps because the first gen is from tsmc. This one, the 2nd gen, is not out yet.

    Historical Fidelity said:
    So this article contradicts itself. First it says that the intel miner is from a US manufacturer but then later says it’s manufactured on TSMC 5nm which is only found in Taiwan…..so which one is it? If GRIID is touting “US manufacturer” then it must be built on intel 7 in the US. Manufacturing it on TSMC 5nm would mean it is very susceptible to geopolitical risk. I mean I guess the author is saying the miner is assembled in the US from TSMC manufactured processors but that doesn’t minimize geopolitical risk….if China invaded Taiwan then you are still cut-off from all the important components. The only way to minimize risk is for intel to manufacturer the components and assemble the miner all in the US.
    Reply
  • Historical Fidelity
    Justin Goldberg said:
    Perhaps because the first gen is from tsmc. This one, the 2nd gen, is not out yet.
    Well the article states the second gen chips are rumored to be manufactured on TSMC 5nm so my argument is valid.
    Reply