Intel’s Five New NUCs Feature Kaby Lake; Some With Thunderbolt 3 And Iris Plus Graphics

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Derek Forrest was a contributing freelance writer for Tom's Hardware. He covered hardware news and reviews, focusing on gaming desktops and laptops.

  • bloodroses
    I wonder how the new iris plus 640 and 650 graphics perform?
    Reply
  • CaedenV
    Come on Intel! Where are the fanless versions of these? Where are the PoE versions of these? I have schools waiting for these things to come out, and they were supposed to hit market LAST year... so where are they?
    Reply
  • Groza_
    Not all poe devices support 65w of power
    Reply
  • Eximo
    *Neat*

    If you want fanless, plenty of companies offer solutions. Not Kabylake, but last time I looked I found a few skylake models. Also plenty of Atom type ones out there, how much power do you need in a NUC?
    Reply
  • nzalog
    Wonder if these are capable enough to tackle 4k with HDR playback at full speed.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    19148414 said:
    I wonder how the new iris plus 640 and 650 graphics perform?
    You'd probably be disappointed. It didn't seem like a substantial leap over the previous gen, from what I recall. They need to stop playing around with these eDRAM buffers and go full HMC.

    19148447 said:
    Where are the fanless versions of these? Where are the PoE versions of these?
    Yeah, I'd love a fanless, Apollo Lake-based NUC. Go ahead and solder in the RAM, while you're at it.

    A PoE NUC is an interesting idea, not that I'd have a use for one.

    19148655 said:
    Not all poe devices support 65w of power
    Well, if we're talking about fanless, then we're obviously not at 65 W. Most NUCs are like 15 - 30 W. Fanless should definitely be somewhere under 10 W. I actually wonder just how loud a 65 W NUC would be, under full load...
    Reply
  • alextheblue
    Speaking of Thunderbolt 3, I've seen specs stating it operates at 20-40 gbits likely depending on controller choice (x2 or x4 lanes). PCIe 3.0 tops out at 8Gb per lane, not counting overhead (which thankfully is fairly small). So are there any controllers that use more than 4 lanes for a single TB 3 connection? Because if not, you're looking at 32Gb/s max. That's a good chunk less than the advertised 40Gb/s. Ditto for the two-lane controller, that's 16 max, not 20.
    Reply
  • hixbot
    Wipe off your fingerprints and hire a photographer.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    19150681 said:
    That's a good chunk less than the advertised 40Gb/s. Ditto for the two-lane controller, that's 16 max, not 20.
    That's an interesting point. Since Thunderbolt can be used as a display interface, it seems like there's got to be at least some minimum sustained bit rate an implementation must provide.
    Reply
  • Skylix001
    How many people do you thing are going to plug a security lock in the USB3.1 port?
    Reply