Intel Core Ultra 5 225 review: Arrow Lake’s forgotten CPU needs a price cut

Arrow Lake Refresh isn’t pushing down prices the way it should.

Intel Core Ultra 5 225
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Core Ultra 5 225 shouldn’t be as disappointing as it is. Since Alder Lake, we’ve seen lower-specced Core i5s as a solid value alternative for folks with around $100 to $150 to spend. AMD has largely ignored this market, at least with its latest microarchitecture, poking the main range to create APUs or rereleasing older chips under new names. The Core Ultra 5 225 is priced to compete with AMD’s main Ryzen 5 offerings at this point, but it performs more like a value-focused alternative.

The pricing situation is made worse by the fact that the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus exists. Arrow Lake Refresh felt like a pricing reset for Intel, as it recognized the underdog position it had slipped into in the face of AMD’s X3D offerings. But, that reset has only applied to the Refresh CPUs; we’ve only seen small price cuts on the main Arrow Lake range, including the Core Ultra 5 225.

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

That gap is most clear in games. Your cheapest entry point without sacrificing a lot of performance is around $170 with the Ryzen 5 7600X, but to get to that next performance tier, you need to jump up to around $220 with the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus or Ryzen 5 7600X3D. Below $150, you quickly start making some big performance trade-offs for only a small decrease in price.

In games, the Core Ultra 5 225 just doesn’t justify its current price. If there’s any Arrow Lake CPU that should cost $180, it’s the 245K, which would marginally outclass the Ryzen 5 7600X for marginally more money at that price. Once again, at $150, the Core Ultra 5 225 would transform into a completely different CPU.

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Application performance is less important at this price, but that’s where the Core Ultra 5 225’s price is most justified. It’s in the same ballpark as the Ryzen 5 9600X in multithreaded performance, and it’s extremely efficient. Still, that proximity to $200 stings for the Core Ultra 5 225 when the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus offers nearly twice the multithreaded performance for only $40 more.

Intel Core Ultra 5 225

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Core Ultra 5 225 earns back some stripes with its solid single-threaded performance, nearly keeping pace with the rest of the Arrow Lake stack and outpacing previous-gen options by wide margins. With access to a bit more power and clock speed, the Core Ultra 5 225 would likely close the gap with other Arrow Lake chips, but unfortunately, that’s not an option on this SKU.

There’s not a situation where the Core Ultra 5 225 makes sense with its current $180 price. The Ryzen 5 9600X is universally faster for $5 more, and spending an extra $20 to $40 on the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus or Ryzen 5 7600X3D will offer worlds-faster productivity or gaming performance, respectively. Even if you had a strict $200 budget to spend on a CPU, the Core Ultra 5 225 doesn’t make sense against AMD.

We’re rating the Core Ultra 5 225 in accordance with its current pricing, but hopefully, we’ll see price cuts. The chip starts to enter the conversation at under $150. Above that price, it doesn’t hold up.

TOPICS
Jake Roach
Senior Analyst, CPUs

Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom’s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors.

  • cyrusfox
    No one is buying the 225 except businesses when the 250k plus retails for $220 and the 250kf for $200. If you want budget gaming cheaper, 14th gen is capable and then you can select DDR4 as well. For a DDR5 platform, 250k plus is the best you can find from Intel.
    Reply
  • Loadedaxe
    I agree with the above.

    For the roughly $50 difference between the 225 and the 250KF, the 225 just feels pointless. Even if retailers dropped it to around $100, DDR5 pricing still kills a lot of the value. At that point, something like a 14400 with DDR4 is the more cost effective and practical solution for most people.

    If DDR5 pricing ever returns to sanity, say 32GB kits under $100 again, then I could see Intel adjusting pricing to make these chips more viable and appealing. I wouldn’t hold my breath though on DDR5 returning to "normal" anytime soon.
    Reply
  • jakewhos
    pretty out of touch article imo who would be buying this for gaming clearly this is targeted more for low power home servers.

    great igpu paired with a very efficient chip
    Reply
  • usertests
    jakewhos said:
    pretty out of touch article imo who would be buying this for gaming clearly this is targeted more for low power home servers.

    great igpu paired with a very efficient chip
    It's too expensive in relation to other offerings and it has a compromised iGPU with two Xe cores disabled out of the full four the 245/250 have.

    Not a good buy for any purpose. Just get the 250K when you see it at $200 MSRP and tune it to use less power if necessary.
    Reply
  • jakewhos
    usertests said:
    It's too expensive in relation to other offerings and it has a compromised iGPU with two Xe cores disabled out of the full four the 245/250 have.

    Not a good buy for any purpose. Just get the 250K when you see it at $200 MSRP and tune it to use less power if necessary.
    You don't really need all the cores for anything the main sell is the newer architecture of the xe cores and you get the stock cooler.
    Reply
  • usertests
    jakewhos said:
    You don't really need all the cores for anything the main sell is the newer architecture of the xe cores and you get the stock cooler.
    Losing half the iGPU is a big loss. Performance should be about on par with any fully enabled Xe-LP iGPU, like the UHD 750 in an old i5-11500. Architectural improvements are barely relevant. Arrow Lake desktop gets Xe-LPG with DPAS instructions disabled. You get better AV1 decode and AV1 encode in Arrow Lake.

    Stock cooler isn't going to have a big effect on value. I say go to something older/used, or step up to the Core Ultra 245K/250K+.
    Reply
  • Co BIY
    Maybe its better to just keep it over priced to make the 250 look like a value.

    Sometimes binning results in a product with no "sweet spot".
    Reply