Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
The Core Ultra 5 225 shouldn’t be as disappointing as it is. Since Alder Lake, we’ve seen lower-specced Core i5s as a solid value alternative for folks with around $100 to $150 to spend. AMD has largely ignored this market, at least with its latest microarchitecture, poking the main range to create APUs or rereleasing older chips under new names. The Core Ultra 5 225 is priced to compete with AMD’s main Ryzen 5 offerings at this point, but it performs more like a value-focused alternative.
The pricing situation is made worse by the fact that the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus exists. Arrow Lake Refresh felt like a pricing reset for Intel, as it recognized the underdog position it had slipped into in the face of AMD’s X3D offerings. But, that reset has only applied to the Refresh CPUs; we’ve only seen small price cuts on the main Arrow Lake range, including the Core Ultra 5 225.
The Core Ultra 5 225 is a perfect demonstration of why price is so important when evaluating a CPU. Any performance is justified given the right price. You can see this narrow spot in the market where the Core Ultra 5 225 slots in perfectly, beating out the sub-$150 chips from the last several generations that are increasingly difficult to find in stock, while still not managing to creep into that $200 performance class. It slots into that position in the market as far as performance goes, just not as far as price goes.
That gap is most clear in games. Your cheapest entry point without sacrificing a lot of performance is around $170 with the Ryzen 5 7600X, but to get to that next performance tier, you need to jump up to around $220 with the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus or Ryzen 5 7600X3D. Below $150, you quickly start making some big performance trade-offs for only a small decrease in price.
In games, the Core Ultra 5 225 just doesn’t justify its current price. If there’s any Arrow Lake CPU that should cost $180, it’s the 245K, which would marginally outclass the Ryzen 5 7600X for marginally more money at that price. Once again, at $150, the Core Ultra 5 225 would transform into a completely different CPU.
Application performance is less important at this price, but that’s where the Core Ultra 5 225’s price is most justified. It’s in the same ballpark as the Ryzen 5 9600X in multithreaded performance, and it’s extremely efficient. Still, that proximity to $200 stings for the Core Ultra 5 225 when the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus offers nearly twice the multithreaded performance for only $40 more.
The Core Ultra 5 225 earns back some stripes with its solid single-threaded performance, nearly keeping pace with the rest of the Arrow Lake stack and outpacing previous-gen options by wide margins. With access to a bit more power and clock speed, the Core Ultra 5 225 would likely close the gap with other Arrow Lake chips, but unfortunately, that’s not an option on this SKU.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
There’s not a situation where the Core Ultra 5 225 makes sense with its current $180 price. The Ryzen 5 9600X is universally faster for $5 more, and spending an extra $20 to $40 on the Core Ultra 5 250K Plus or Ryzen 5 7600X3D will offer worlds-faster productivity or gaming performance, respectively. Even if you had a strict $200 budget to spend on a CPU, the Core Ultra 5 225 doesn’t make sense against AMD.
We’re rating the Core Ultra 5 225 in accordance with its current pricing, but hopefully, we’ll see price cuts. The chip starts to enter the conversation at under $150. Above that price, it doesn’t hold up.
- MORE: Best CPU for gaming
- MORE: CPU Benchmark Hierarchy
- MORE: Intel vs AMD
- MORE: How to Overclock a CPU
Current page: A budget performer that needs a price drop
Prev Page Intel Core Ultra 5 225 power consumption, efficiency, test setup
Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom’s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors.
-
cyrusfox No one is buying the 225 except businesses when the 250k plus retails for $220 and the 250kf for $200. If you want budget gaming cheaper, 14th gen is capable and then you can select DDR4 as well. For a DDR5 platform, 250k plus is the best you can find from Intel.Reply -
Loadedaxe I agree with the above.Reply
For the roughly $50 difference between the 225 and the 250KF, the 225 just feels pointless. Even if retailers dropped it to around $100, DDR5 pricing still kills a lot of the value. At that point, something like a 14400 with DDR4 is the more cost effective and practical solution for most people.
If DDR5 pricing ever returns to sanity, say 32GB kits under $100 again, then I could see Intel adjusting pricing to make these chips more viable and appealing. I wouldn’t hold my breath though on DDR5 returning to "normal" anytime soon. -
jakewhos pretty out of touch article imo who would be buying this for gaming clearly this is targeted more for low power home servers.Reply
great igpu paired with a very efficient chip -
usertests Reply
It's too expensive in relation to other offerings and it has a compromised iGPU with two Xe cores disabled out of the full four the 245/250 have.jakewhos said:pretty out of touch article imo who would be buying this for gaming clearly this is targeted more for low power home servers.
great igpu paired with a very efficient chip
Not a good buy for any purpose. Just get the 250K when you see it at $200 MSRP and tune it to use less power if necessary. -
jakewhos Reply
You don't really need all the cores for anything the main sell is the newer architecture of the xe cores and you get the stock cooler.usertests said:It's too expensive in relation to other offerings and it has a compromised iGPU with two Xe cores disabled out of the full four the 245/250 have.
Not a good buy for any purpose. Just get the 250K when you see it at $200 MSRP and tune it to use less power if necessary. -
usertests Reply
Losing half the iGPU is a big loss. Performance should be about on par with any fully enabled Xe-LP iGPU, like the UHD 750 in an old i5-11500. Architectural improvements are barely relevant. Arrow Lake desktop gets Xe-LPG with DPAS instructions disabled. You get better AV1 decode and AV1 encode in Arrow Lake.jakewhos said:You don't really need all the cores for anything the main sell is the newer architecture of the xe cores and you get the stock cooler.
Stock cooler isn't going to have a big effect on value. I say go to something older/used, or step up to the Core Ultra 245K/250K+. -
Co BIY Maybe its better to just keep it over priced to make the 250 look like a value.Reply
Sometimes binning results in a product with no "sweet spot".