Intel taps Apple for potential investment, says report — companies said to be discussing ways to work together more closely

Apple
(Image credit: Apple)

Intel is in preliminary discussions with Apple regarding a potential investment, according to Bloomberg, which cites sources familiar with the matter. The two companies are also reportedly exploring ways to work more closely together, although it remains to be seen whether any potential deals can be reached, as negotiations are in the early stages and may not come to fruition.

The reported talks with Apple follow a string of recent deals, including major funding from Nvidia and SoftBank, and conversion of CHIPS Act funding from the U.S. government to equity. These moves are believed to be a part of the company's revival strategy that not only includes securing money, but also securing commitments to use the company's products and services going forward to justify developing Intel's next-generation 14A process technology and building production capacities that will support the node.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • -Fran-
    What is next? Lip-Bu begging outside of Wallstreet for investment?

    Regards.
    Reply
  • DS426
    Apple's best interests are to let Intel continue to stumble; Intel will get way more out of the two scratching each other's backs. If Intel 14A is feasible for Apple Silicon production, sure, go for it, by why would Apple even risk it when they are one of TSMC's top customers and TSMC has the proven track record to consistently iterate forward? Tan has minimum margins established, so it's not like they can offer Apple a "deal" relative to TSMC (and even with 2 nm pricing going WAY up).
    Reply
  • S58_is_the_goat
    -Fran- said:
    What is next? Lip-Bu begging outside of Wallstreet for investment?

    Regards.
    Intel: hello and thank you for your interest in supporting intel, we also accept donations, the bigger the donation the bigger the tax write off 😉
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    DS426 said:
    why would Apple even risk it when they are one of TSMC's top customers and TSMC has the proven track record to consistently iterate forward?
    TSMC also has a track record of increasing prices all the time and being backed up months ahead.
    Having intel as a second source will increase apples turn around, and will give TSMC some urgency to compete on prices, which both are always welcome things.
    DS426 said:
    Tan has minimum margins established, so it's not like they can offer Apple a "deal" relative to TSMC (and even with 2 nm pricing going WAY up).
    Those margins are for intel products not for the FABs, not that the FABs don't have a margin to reach but so do TSMC's .
    Reply
  • 93QSD5
    Embarrassing
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Intel’s got a yard sale going on it seems.
    Reply
  • Mr Majestyk
    -Fran- said:
    What is next? Lip-Bu begging outside of Wallstreet for investment?

    Regards.
    No doubt Chump had his puppets demand Tim Apple help save Intel behind the scenes.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    DS426 said:
    If Intel 14A is feasible for Apple Silicon production, sure, go for it, by why would Apple even risk it when they are one of TSMC's top customers and TSMC has the proven track record to consistently iterate forward?
    Apple has been minimizing cost output with regards to manufacturing so it's entirely possible they could manufacture down stack chips with IFS. Word is that Samsung recently cut prices on their 2nm node which undoubtedly is driven to keep their fabs busy as idle fabs cost more than selling silicon at a discounted rate. I highly doubt Intel would cut them a deal on whatever the leading edge node would be, assuming it's competitive, but in a hypothetical 14A is ready world then maybe Apple could go with 18A at a lower cost than TSMC N2(whatever derivative is up at the time).
    Reply