Toshiba XG6 M.2 NVMe SSD Review: Higher Density and Improved Efficiency

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Toshiba's OEM XG6 comes packing the goodness of 3D TLC BiCS flash and a five-year warranty, but you can't buy it at retail. We'll see this design ported over to Toshiba's consumer lineup soon. Toshiba sells flash to other SSD vendors, so we'll see enthusiast-class models with the same flash soon. In the meantime, you can find this drive in an OEM laptop or desktop near you.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    M.2 2280 single-sided form factor

  • +

    Sequential throughput

  • +

    Great power efficiency

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Small SLC cache

  • -

    You can't buy it separately

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Features and Specifications

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • AgentLozen
    Seems pretty solid. Thanks for the review.
    Reply
  • philipemaciel
    Cons: "seperately"
    Reply
  • rantoc
    Seems like a solid laptop ssd
    Reply
  • Brian_R170
    Why bother to review this model if consumers can't even buy it except in a pre-built system? How many people make their system purchase decisions based on the SSD inside? Outside of boutique stuff, how many OEMs actually list the SSD model in their specifications?

    Plus, any future SSD design based off of this model won't likely have identical specs, so you'd have to retest it anyway.
    Reply
  • stdragon
    I've had three OEM Toshiba NVMe drives fail in less than a year in a Dell.
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    Why is the Intel Optane 905P included on some benchmarks and not on others? It would be nice to have consistency throughout the review. Either have it in all of the benchmarks, or just don't include it at all.

    I understand you may be including results from a previous test on the 905P that may not have had all of the same tests as this XG6. However, it's frustrating to me when I see it one benchmark (I do like that it's included), but then when I want to compare against it on another one, it's not there.

    So I would say if you don't have it for all of the tests, just exclude it from all of them.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    21275682 said:
    Cons: "seperately"

    Good eye, fixed!
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    21276173 said:
    Why is the Intel Optane 905P included on some benchmarks and not on others? It would be nice to have consistency throughout the review. Either have it in all of the benchmarks, or just don't include it at all.

    I understand you may be including results from a previous test on the 905P that may not have had all of the same tests as this XG6. However, it's frustrating to me when I see it one benchmark (I do like that it's included), but then when I want to compare against it on another one, it's not there.

    So I would say if you don't have it for all of the tests, just exclude it from all of them.

    Thanks for the feedback, it is appreciated. Over the last few months we've changed our test regimen entirely to more accurately reflect real-world use cases, much of this due to reader feedback. We are still in a state of flux somewhat with the current line up of tests as we optimize the suite to focus on the things that matter most, and avoid things that don't. Reader feedback has a big impact on our decisions. In either case, the adjustments have led to a few devices not being included until we can complete backfill testing, but we'll work to rectify that.
    Reply
  • jpe1701
    Where is Chris?
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    21277464 said:
    Where is Chris?

    Chris decided to pursue another opportunity, which is unfortunate but part of the business at times. Sean, who has years of experience testing and reviewing storage, has stepped into the role now.
    Reply