‘Most of you steal your software’ — Bill Gates complained about software piracy 50 years ago, and was openly irked by community's Altair BASIC ‘theft’
‘The thing you do is theft,’ grumbled the ‘Micro-Soft’ boss in an open letter about unauthorized software copying, dated Feb 1976.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
‘An Open Letter to Hobbyists,’ typed by William Henry (Bill) Gates III, was shared with the budding computer hobbyist community 50 years ago this week. The letter makes it clear that, even from the start of the personal computer business, there has always been a problem with software piracy.
The New York Times archives include a copy of the February 1976 letter, in which an irked Gates explains how unfair it is that ‘Micro-Soft’ Altair BASIC is flagrantly stolen, copied, and redistributed by the hobbyist market. This edition of BASIC was the firm’s first commercial offering, created by Gates and co-founder Paul Allen, written for the MITS Altair 8800.
The Altair 8800, with its Intel 8080 CPU and S-100 bus cards, ignited the desktop personal computer revolution in 1975. It rapidly became central to the establishment of the PC hobbyist movement, community, and ecosystem. This is despite the system’s rudimentary kit form and lack of a keyboard or screen, in its default configuration.
Gates begins his open letter by explaining the costs of developing and the attractions of a good software ecosystem for hobbyists. He logically turns to outline the costs involved in producing 'Micro-Soft' software. Then he begins to show frustration by informing readers that he gets feedback from hundreds of Altair BASIC users, despite “most of these ‘users’ never bought BASIC.” This is just the beginning of Gates’ rant.
“Most of you steal your software”
Wikipedia provides some important background, which helps explain the frustration of Gates. In brief, it says that a pre-release version of Altair BASIC was acquired by members of the famous Homebrew Computer Club and copied using a high-speed tape punch (50 copies). Moreover, other hobbyists bundled this version of Altair BASIC ‘free’ with their memory board hardware projects.
Now in full-throttle complain mode, “As the majority of hobbyists must be aware, most of you steal your software,” Gates wrote. “Hardware must be paid for, but software is something to share. Who cares if the people who worked on it get paid?”
In addition to this injustice, Gates appealed to the sensibilities of the community by asserting that further high-quality hobby software development would only be attractive if more users paid. The business model, with costs in development, computer time, manuals, media, and so on, made Micro-Soft nothing more than “a break-even operation,” grumbled Gates.
If the Altair hobbyist community were more fair, he went on to suggest, “Nothing would please me more than being able to hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market with good software.”
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.
-
JRHERITA Reply
And Apple likewise stole from Xenon PARCLordVile said:Ironic considering the amount Microsoft stole from Apple -
hotaru251 Replyby asserting that further high-quality hobby software development would only be attractive if more users paid.
meanwhile its unpaid people fixing the software they make since the people paid to do so won't. -
JarredWaltonGPU Reply
This is completely wrong. What Gates was complaining about was a 100% copy of a product his company had created. What happened with Windows and MacOS was that both were inspired by the Xerox PARC prototype GUI / OS, which Xerox didn't really do anything with. Then Apple cloned the idea — not a copy of the software, but the creation of NEW software that worked in a similar fashion. And then Microsoft took a similar approach and cloned what both Apple and Xerox had done.LordVile said:Ironic considering the amount Microsoft stole from Apple
Given that MacOS ("System Software" at the time) was at the time written for Motorola 68000 series processors, and Windows was written for Intel x86 processors, there could be no direct copying. And let's also be clear that Apple did create a lot of its own new ideas with the final shipping OS — Xerox PARC mostly had a prototype without being a full OS, AFAIK.
There's a lot of debate about what influence the various OS efforts back in the late 70s and early 80s. Windows 1.0 was announced before the first Macintosh was released, but after Lisa. But even then, there were other efforts to make "windowing" operating systems before Lisa came out, like VisionCorp's Visi On, first shown at COMDEX in 1982.
So, we have Xerox PARC in 1979 that went basically nowhere, but Jobs saw it demonstrated. Gates hired Charles Simonyi, who had worked for Xerox PARC, and thus knew far more about the GUI work there than Gates. Other companies were toying with GUI concepts in a variety of forms, some of which shipped.
I don't think it's much of a stretch to say that in the early 80s, the idea of moving away from pure text to something closer looking to the final output was obvious. How to get there differed, but no one thought, "Oh, pure ASCII text is all we'll ever need..." Even games were already moving beyond pure text, so why wouldn't other applications? What was missing was the computational power and hardware to make it viable, and that would change in the coming years.