Microsoft Store change removes the ability to stop App updates — pausing automatic updates now limited to a 5-week duration

Microsoft Store app updates
(Image credit: Future)

Microsoft just released an update on the Microsoft Store app for Windows 10 and 11 that removed the ability to permanently pause app updates. According to Deskmodder.de [machine translated], you can now only pause automatic app updates for a period between a week and five weeks. After that, your Windows PC will resume scanning for updates for all the apps you have installed via the Microsoft Store. This makes it similar to Windows Update, which gives you the same options for pausing Windows updates, after which it automatically resumes (unless you pause it again). The source publication tried changing the Microsoft Store’s registry entries to try getting back the option to switch off updates indefinitely, but to no avail.

It’s likely that Microsoft decided to force automatic app updates to help keep its users secure. Hackers often exploit weaknesses in apps to gain backdoor access to computers. Although developers usually catch these security bugs sooner or later, the vulnerability will remain if the people who use these apps do not update them.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Tell me something Jowi: How is this any more "risky" than using an application that features an automatic updater? How is it going to lead to any more "buggy" updates than it did before just because it's being sourced from the Microsoft Store instead of the dev's website directly?

    Defend your stance, don't just bash Microsoft like you do in so many of your "articles".
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Defend your stance, don't just bash Microsoft like you do in so many of your "articles".
    No need, no amount of M$ bashing needs needs defending... especially since nobody there cares about PC owner choices.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    abufrejoval said:
    No need, no amount of M$ bashing needs needs defending... especially since nobody there cares about PC owner choices.

    It does when the whole premise of the article that is based on a machine translated German article is "MICROSOFT DOING BAD THINGS AGAIN!" and accusing third party app developers of being able to potentially push through faulty updates more frequently than they do than apps with a built in updater, and even somehow trying to connect this to the Crowdstrike outage which is in a completely different league.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    It does when the whole premise of the article that is based on a machine translated German article is "MICROSOFT DOING BAD THINGS AGAIN!" and accusing third party app developers of being able to potentially push through faulty updates more frequently than they do than apps with a built in updater, and even somehow trying to connect this to the Crowdstrike outage which is in a completely different league.
    I guess we Germans just don't feel all that well treated by M$ these days :cool: (and nearly everything else US)

    Especially after far too many elected officials here have had their opinions altered by M$ lobbyists. M$ has been raking in billions from this side of the pond and somehow we expect a return: silly us!

    I'd say that more than 90% of us believe that Windows 11 should just run on those very high quality Windows machines we bought over the last decade or two: we don't believe in chrome monsters that rust away within three years (nor in Chrome).

    And then M$ quite simply sucks in every which direction you care to look at it (and all your data as well). Plenty of US citizens being in perfect agreement as far as that is concerned.

    P.S. BTW nobody needs machine translation for English on this side of the pond: I don't know if you guys are aware of just how unilateral many language gaps are...
    Reply
  • MoxNix
    If it wasn't for one game and a few development programs I need that don't run natively on Linux I'd drop Windows in a heartbeat. It's getting to the point I might have to see if they'll run well enough under Wine or some other emulator.

    For that matter I don't want any MS store apps at all. I don't want their stupid browser, telemetry/spyware or any of the other bloatware junk they continually come up with new ways to force on users whenever we manage to remove or disable them.

    It's my machine I paid for it not MS. I'm sick and tired of MS trying to take control of my property from me.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    The best way to fix it. Is stopping using Windows or Microsoft.
    Got my old system running at full speed.
    Working with windows xp x86 and windows 7 x86.
    I Don't miss the microsoft store.
    Reply
  • Stomx
    MoxNix said:
    If it wasn't for one game and a few development programs I need that don't run natively on Linux I'd drop Windows in a heartbeat. It's getting to the point I might have to see if they'll run well enough under Wine or some other emulator.

    For that matter I don't want any MS store apps at all. I don't want their stupid browser, telemetry/spyware or any of the other bloatware junk they continually come up with new ways to force on users whenever we manage to remove or disable them.

    It's my machine I paid for it not MS. I'm sick and tired of MS trying to take control of my property from me.
    Exactly.

    Most disastrous with Windows is its OS updates requiring you to close all your open apps with 100 tabs, permanently ON software, articles , unfinished for years papers. That alone makes me deeply hate Microsoft.

    There is actually almost zero progress in MS OSes in decades ( the same true essentially with other OSes, including Linux) and the only what has some value with updates is their virus and critical vulnerabilities updates.

    /... As to specific software updates with Linux which has its minuscule users base additionally spread over 30 distros - that is a disaster from the other camp. If you have many apps and will allow automatic updates then in a year or two your Linux will simply completely disintegrate (and for example blogger Chris Titus has life span in average just 6 months for almost any Linux OS he uses). Windows here is a bit better - because has more users per each app

    As to WINE, first it is not an emulator (WINE comes from WI is Not an Emulator), but when you succeed to install it (unfortunately not in one click), when it works and after some time does not stop working (happens on one of my computers) , it may amaze and shock you how great it is. Specifically WINE with BOTTLE (together funny names). It's better than standard Losedows...I mean....Windows sometimes. That's how all OSes must be made in 21th century: you take any software for any OS, click on any Linux or Windows file and all open or running automatically like in native environment. WINE is such symbiosis of Windows and Linux
    Reply
  • snemarch
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Tell me something Jowi: How is this any more "risky" than using an application that features an automatic updater? How is it going to lead to any more "buggy" updates than it did before just because it's being sourced from the Microsoft Store instead of the dev's website directly?
    For most other software I use (except cloud-first crap - that's a topic for another discussion), I can choose to opt-out of software updates.

    This ham-fisted approach from Microsoft is... not really surprising, but it ought to result in... the EU taking action, or everybody in the decision chain who OK'd this being lined up against a wall.

    I'm sick and tired of choice and control being taken away from consumers. Yes, keeping applications updated is generally good for security, but there's many valid reasons to want to stick to specific software versions.
    Reply
  • bill001g
    This is all because there is no real penalty when some company no matter who they are pushes a faulty update. Even when you get a massive case that goes to court the companies insurance pays off, the lawyers get lots of money and the end consumer get a coupon for $.50 off their next purchase. If you got that and 1 customer then gets the right to use a fully charged taser on the CEO balls maybe they would care.
    Reply
  • umeng2002_2
    Another reason to avoid the Windows store.
    Reply