Elon Musk hints that second-gen Tesla Roadster might fly — new model to demo soon

A Red Tesla Roadster 2.
(Image credit: Tesla)

Speaking on the Joe Rogan podcast, Musk reiterated that Tesla’s next-gen roadster, which was announced eight years ago and was originally meant to go into production in 2020, will “hopefully” be demoed before the end of 2025, and that it includes “crazy, crazy technology,” adding that it’s crazier than “all the James Bond cars” combined.

The outspoken and controversial CEO then went on to comment on flying vehicles. “My friend Peter Thiel once reflected that the future was supposed to have flying cars, but we don’t have flying cars,” adding that people will “have to wait until the demo” when asked whether Tesla is currently trying to make a flying car.

Musk originally mused about adding a “SpaceX package” with cold-air thrusters to the Roadster 2 when it was unveiled in 2017. These, in theory, could at least lift the car off the ground and allow it to hover for a short period of time. Tesla is known to have filed patents for “adaptive vehicle aerodynamics”, but it’s unclear whether Musk was talking about the same thing during the podcast.

At the time of its unveiling, the second-generation Roadster was pitched as the fastest production car on the planet, boasting 0-60 in 1.9 seconds and a 620-mile range. It was also supposed to ship in 2020. That didn’t happen. Tesla’s focus shifted to the likes of the Cybertruck and Model S refresh, and the Roadster 2 quietly faded into the background. Although Musk has repeatedly said the Roadster 2 is in development and close to finalization, we’ve seen no evidence to support this claim.

The most likely scenario — if there’s any truth to what Musk is hinting at — will be a demo that involves a tightly constrained hover test that shows off the potential. But even that would be a serious technical feat. The car’s structural design would need to accommodate both high-speed road performance and vertical lift stabilization, something no mainstream automaker has attempted.

Comments by Tesla’s Design Director, Franz von Holzhausen, corroborate Musk’s claim of an imminent demo. Speaking on the ‘Ride the Lightning’ podcast recently, he confirmed that the Roadster’s development was moving ahead and that a reveal should take place this year. As for whether it might be demoed with something resembling flight capabilities, Musk’s comments are probably ones to ignore.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Google Preferred Source

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • Notton
    I hope they don't put an incendiary explosive device in the crumple zone.
    I hope they switch to physical door locks instead of electronic ones that power off when the Li-Ion battery in the crumple zone gets destroyed, and you have to find the emergency release lever hidden under upholstery and changes position depending on what month it was made in.
    With how bad most tesla drivers are and how bad the auto-pilot is, I don't want it flying anywhere within 10,000km of me.
    Reply
  • kyzarvs
    I'd much rather Tesla finished the features they have already promised before issuing more obviously half-baked clickbait imo...
    Reply
  • thesyndrome
    The "where's my flying car" argument is easily resolved once you spend ANY amount of time on the road with other drivers and then stop to think about it; people can barely handle a car working on purely an x-axis without crashing due to inattention or lacking judgement, as soon as you add a y-axis to that you can bet the amount (and severity) of accidents will skyrocket.

    The best argument against flying cars is current drivers.
    Reply
  • Tanakoi
    thesyndrome said:
    ... as soon as you add a y-axis to that you can bet the amount (and severity) of accidents will skyrocket.

    The best argument against flying cars is current drivers.
    Z axis, to be precise. And certainly no "flying car" will ever be allowed by the FAA until either it's full autonomous, or the driver is a certified pilot.

    Notton said:
    I hope they switch to physical door locks instead of electronic ones that power off when the Li-Ion battery in the crumple zone gets destroyed, and you have to find the emergency release lever ...
    The entire reason "jaws of life" exist is that in any serious accident, odds are high that physical lock or not, the doors aren't opening on their own.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Tanakoi said:
    Z axis, to be precise. And certainly no "flying car" will ever be allowed by the FAA until either it's full autonomous, or the driver is a certified pilot.


    The entire reason "jaws of life" exist is that in any serious accident, odds are high that physical lock or not, the doors aren't opening on their own.
    Uh huh, and if the doors weren't damaged and could be opened on their own, were it not for power loss?

    Oh, and you won't need the jaws of life for a tesla. It'll burn to a crisp in as little as 15 seconds.
    Reply
  • vanadiel007
    Musk is in the clouds. He should come down to earth.
    Reply
  • kealii123
    Energy density needed for flight and energy density available in modern lithium batteries do not align haha
    Reply