AMD Outlines New AGESA Memory OC Settings For Gaming, Explores Frequency Versus Timings

It's a well-known fact that faster memory frequencies have a profound impact on Ryzen's gaming performance. Increasing Ryzen's memory frequency also decreases the Infinity Fabric's latency, which likely plays a big role in the increased gaming performance. However, memory timings and other factors also play a significant role in increased performance, so AMD penned a helpful blog post with its findings.

AMD has already significantly improved Ryzen's memory support and performance through a string of BIOS updates, but the newest AGESA 1.0.0.6 protocol exposes yet more settings for more fine-grained tuning. AMD announced the new AGESA code at the end of May, and motherboard vendors have released a steady cadence of BIOS revisions that support the new code. According to our observations, nearly every vendor now supports the new protocol. AMD tested with the Asus Crosshair VI, but the new settings should apply to almost all motherboards with current firmware/AGESA revisions.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • TechyInAZ
    Awesome!! So glad were continuously receiving updates for Ryzen like this.
    Reply
  • rwinches
    Some charts are blurry.

    So it would be nice if mem would be app-aware and switch setting automatically based on a list.
    Reply
  • ClusT3R
    Where is the BGS option ? I cannot Find it, is this something that the crosshair only have ? I bought the Strix X370 awesome I'm running ar 3466Mhz at 4ghz, I didn't find the right spot for 3600ghz yet.
    Reply
  • alextheblue
    Nice of AMD to release memory tuning data for their new AGESA release.
    Reply
  • Rob1C
    Finally a move forward to where higher speed Memory is worth more than bragging rights and wallet depletion.

    Still I wish more effort went into a bigger L1 and a huge L3.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    19943481 said:
    Where is the BGS option ? I cannot Find it, is this something that the crosshair only have ? I bought the Strix X370 awesome I'm running ar 3466Mhz at 4ghz, I didn't find the right spot for 3600ghz yet.

    I don't have an ASUS board to answer that specifically. Have you updated to the latest BIOS with AGESA 1.0.0.6? The settings may not have the same name, but there are sure to be equivalent settings.
    Reply
  • ClusT3R
    19946407 said:
    19943481 said:
    Where is the BGS option ? I cannot Find it, is this something that the crosshair only have ? I bought the Strix X370 awesome I'm running ar 3466Mhz at 4ghz, I didn't find the right spot for 3600ghz yet.

    I don't have an ASUS board to answer that specifically. Have you updated to the latest BIOS with AGESA 1.0.0.6? The settings may not have the same name, but there are sure to be equivalent settings.

    Your settings at 3466Mhz works like charm for me, I replicate the exact parameters on your graph, thank I had BF1 at 3200mhz on average of 115 - 120 now is 124 - 137 I got a ryzen 1700 3.9Ghz and the Strix x370 totally worth it.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    19946815 said:
    19946407 said:
    19943481 said:
    Where is the BGS option ? I cannot Find it, is this something that the crosshair only have ? I bought the Strix X370 awesome I'm running ar 3466Mhz at 4ghz, I didn't find the right spot for 3600ghz yet.

    I don't have an ASUS board to answer that specifically. Have you updated to the latest BIOS with AGESA 1.0.0.6? The settings may not have the same name, but there are sure to be equivalent settings.

    Your settings at 3466Mhz works like charm for me, I replicate the exact parameters on your graph, thank I had BF1 at 3200mhz on average of 115 - 120 now is 124 - 137 I got a ryzen 1700 3.9Ghz and the Strix x370 totally worth it.

    Pretty impressive!
    Reply
  • beavermml
    do they have the result for normal 2400mhz ram?
    Reply
  • Wisecracker
    Is BSG the 'new and improved' version of the old AMD bank swizzle?

    If I recall correctly, bank swizzle was a 'remapping' to minimize or reduce page faults. It should be rather simple to monitor effects/impact via task manager.

    That said, some applications are page-faulting nightmares that are unlikely to benefit from any tweaking BUT it would seem to fit nicely with DDR4 addressing and AMD's push for 'unified memory' in the arch ...

    unless you get caught in some type of 'remapping, page-faulting' loop not unlike the early days of NUMA multiple DIMM bank 'Hades'.





    Reply