Intel 11th-Gen Rocket Lake, Comet Lake Refresh CPUs Specs Emerge From Overseas

Intel 11th Generation Rocket Lake Processor
Intel 11th Generation Rocket Lake Processor (Image credit: ijiandao)

Chinese news outlet ijiandao (via Harukaze5719) has reportedly shared the general specifications for Intel's upcoming Rocket Lake and Comet Lake Refresh processors. Apparently, both families will live under the same 11th-Gen moniker.

Rocket Lake, which is the more interesting lineup out of the two, will arrive furnished with Intel's 14nm Cypress Cove cores and Xe graphics. Like AMD, Intel has promised double-digit instruction per cycle (IPC) uplifts. The first leaked benchmark submissions have revealed that there might be some truth to Intel's word. However, Rocket Lake's multi-core performance remains to be seen since the new chips will max out at eight cores, a big regression compared to Comet Lake that pushed the maximum configuration to 10 cores.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • hotaru251
    someday intel will give more L3 cache.....how long has it been since they increased it last?
    Reply
  • NightHawkRMX
    Ah yes, less cores. Exactly what we want.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    NightHawkRMX said:
    Ah yes, less cores. Exactly what we want.
    According to steam, about 90% of the market has fewer than 8 cores and 1% has more than 8 cores. Those aren't numbers indicating anyone is clamoring for more than 8 cores. I have yet to see any compelling evidence that even enthusiasts get any tangible benefit either now or in the next few years for more than 16 threads. I am far more interested in faster cores than more cores at this point.
    Reply
  • NightHawkRMX
    There are plenty of workloads that benefit from it.
    Sure, it might not benefit a lot of people, but that doesn't mean you aren't getting less for your money and it hurts performance in some cases.
    Reply
  • JayNor
    "Intel is last to the party since PCIe 4.0 support was already present in AMD's previous-gen Ryzen 3000 (codename Matisse) processors that debuted one year ago."

    Intel introduced PCIE4 in Tiger Lake laptop chips. Are those not considered mainstream?
    Reply
  • JayNor
    Intel also introduced PCIE4 in their Stratix 10 DX chips in 2019.
    Reply
  • NightHawkRMX
    Yes but no.

    A) tiger lake is mobile not desktop
    B) tiger lake has a whopping 4 pcie 4 lanes. Good enough for storage which is the primary use of PCIe 4, but it doesn't seem like a proper implementation to me.
    C) tiger lake is much newer than zen 2, so yes, Intel is late to the party.
    Reply
  • FakeMike
    JayNor said:
    "Intel is last to the party since PCIe 4.0 support was already present in AMD's previous-gen Ryzen 3000 (codename Matisse) processors that debuted one year ago."

    Intel introduced PCIE4 in Tiger Lake laptop chips. Are those not considered mainstream?
    Tiger Like is a laptop CPU. This article is about PC CPUs.
    Reply
  • Conahl
    spongiemaster said:
    According to steam
    yea, cause everyone that plays games, uses steam.
    Reply
  • neojack
    spongiemaster said:
    According to steam, about 90% of the market has fewer than 8 cores and 1% has more than 8 cores. Those aren't numbers indicating anyone is clamoring for more than 8 cores. I have yet to see any compelling evidence that even enthusiasts get any tangible benefit either now or in the next few years for more than 16 threads. I am far more interested in faster cores than more cores at this point.

    ahah, im sure i can find posts from 2-3 years ago, from people like you, saying 4 cores 8t are enough, and the 8c/16t offered by the 1700/2700 will be useless.

    guess what, now the 8 cores are still enthousiats-class, while the 7700k is considered entry-level, equals the gen10 i3 and ryzen 3100


    as long as speeds are >4ghz, more cores are a great way to futureproofing a build
    Reply