Intel Sneaks Out Core+ Processors With Bundled Optane Drives (Update: Pricing, Availability)

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Barty1884
    So the "bundle" offers no benefit in pricing vs buying them individually? :lol:

    I still don't understand why Optane even exists.
    Small, cache drive would benefit older systems.... but you have to be on KL (?) or newer for support?
    The vast majority of people building on a new platform are using full-blown SSDs.. no?
    Reply
  • Snipergod87
    20859503 said:
    So the "bundle" offers no benefit in pricing vs buying them individually? :lol:

    I still don't understand why Optane even exists.
    Small, cache drive would benefit older systems.... but you have to be on KL (?) or newer for support?
    The vast majority of people building on a new platform are using full-blown SSDs.. no?

    Its also amusing that Optane isnt supported on the 310 chipset either
    Reply
  • Barty1884
    Seriously? Haven't read much into the new chipsets yet.

    That's ridiculous. To me, that's exactly who something like Optane is aimed at? Very tight budgets, with no room for luxuries like an SSD.

    *sigh*
    Reply
  • hons
    BARTY1884 17 minutes ago
    So the "bundle" offers no benefit in pricing vs buying them individually? :lol:

    I still don't understand why Optane even exists.
    Small, cache drive would benefit older systems.... but you have to be on KL (?) or newer for support?
    The vast majority of people building on a new platform are using full-blown SSDs.. no?

    For the same price you got a extra "+". :)
    Free from Intel!!!!!
    Reply
  • Giroro
    Optane exists so you can turn your 3TB+ HDD into a SSHD that actually works as advertised.

    But since there is no discount, skip the bundle and get the 32GB optane instead; it performs better. Actually everybody who is interested in optane is probably already wants the 32GB version, which would explain why intel is looking for creative ways to clear out the 16GB cards before they announce the next generation.
    Reply
  • Barty1884
    20859722 said:
    Optane exists so you can turn your 3TB+ HDD into a SSHD that actually works as advertised.

    I understand why it's *marketed* to exist, but not actually "why".

    The minimum support (KL i3, B250, DDR4 etc) is a bare minimum $250 before you can even have the 'privilege' of Optane :lol: As an upgrade to older systems, for a relatively cheap outlay (perhaps paired with a PCIe addon card), it would make some form of sense...... in it's current state, I just don't see how.

    An actual SSD, 250GB range, albeit SATA3 and on the budget end... can frequently be found for $60-$70.
    https://pcpartpicker.com/product/M3RzK8/adata-ultimate-su650-240gb-25-solid-state-drive-asu650ss-240gt-c

    The same (general) ballpark as Intel's over-hyped cache drive's MSRP at $77 :lol:
    Reply
  • stdragon
    20859841 said:
    20859722 said:
    Optane exists so you can turn your 3TB+ HDD into a SSHD that actually works as advertised.

    I understand why it's *marketed* to exist, but not actually "why".

    The minimum support (KL i3, B250, DDR4 etc) is a bare minimum $250 before you can even have the 'privilege' of Optane :lol: As an upgrade to older systems, for a relatively cheap outlay (perhaps paired with a PCIe addon card), it would make some form of sense...... in it's current state, I just don't see how.

    An actual SSD, 250GB range, albeit SATA3 and on the budget end... can frequently be found for $60-$70.
    https://pcpartpicker.com/product/M3RzK8/adata-ultimate-su650-240gb-25-solid-state-drive-asu650ss-240gt-c

    The same (general) ballpark as Intel's over-hyped cache drive's MSRP at $77 :lol:

    Agreed....right up to the point where Intel just announced with the new RST driver, you will be able to use Optane with an HDD other than your primary boot device.

    While other applications could benefit, for gamers at least, this means having a 3+TB SSHD drive used to hold your Steam library to improve loading times for the games most often played. That's huge, because buying anything larger than a 256GB M.2 NVMe drive is a waste of money if you can add a secondary HDD and Optane unit later. And remember, Optane doesn't offer much in terms performance over NVMe drives with the exception of random IOPS; Optane stomps the competition in that one metric!
    Reply
  • Barty1884
    Makes some sense in that scenario, I guess.

    But it's still a cache drive. Not benefiting much beyond THE most frequently used title with 16-32GB though.
    Reply
  • cryoburner
    20859560 said:
    That's ridiculous. To me, that's exactly who something like Optane is aimed at? Very tight budgets, with no room for luxuries like an SSD.
    Technically, someone on a "very tight budget" could get a 120-128GB SSD for the same price as a 16GB Optane cache. There are multiple SSDs in that capacity range available for less than $40. And that should be plenty of space to store one's OS and applications, while most large bulk data files such as video typically won't really benefit from being stored on an SSD or cached with Optane anyway, and should be fine on a hard drive without it. Or, for just $20 more, you can double that SSD capacity to 240GB, enough to also store some modern games that are actively being played. So, I don't actually think it's a particularly good fit for budget systems.

    For a more mid-range gaming system, again, there are SSDs available, including some 480-512GB models in the $110-$120 range, which should hold a decent number of games. Maybe someone could see some occasional benefit from adding an Optane cache to a hard drive containing lesser-played titles in their extended Steam library, but how much is a 16GB cache really going to help load times when divided across a large collection of infrequently played games? Relatively few of any game's data files will ever get cached, and any game that you play regularly enough to get its data cached should probably be moved over to an SSD for more predictable performance.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Optane - A complex solution looking for a problem that has already been solved.
    Reply