Intel Announces 'In-Silicon' Fixes For Meltdown And Spectre Coming This Year, 10nm Update

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • jasonelmore
    I want one of those "new" CPU's with the in-silicon fix. Intel, I just purchased a 7900X 2 months ago, I expect to have this CPU swapped out for a comparable "in-silicon fix" model. If you will not offer replacements, we will sue. This chip is slower than the 4790K it replaced in day-to-day task. I can notice a huge difference just in desktop animation speed after the meltdown/spectre fixes.

    Please offer silicon replacements, i'm asking nicely ;)
    Reply
  • mwryder55
    "Krzanich stated that the company would continue to ship 10nm processors in the first half of 2017 and then kick into high-volume manufacturing in the second half of the year."
    I think you meant 2018, not 2017.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    20636149 said:
    "Krzanich stated that the company would continue to ship 10nm processors in the first half of 2017 and then kick into high-volume manufacturing in the second half of the year."
    I think you meant 2018, not 2017.

    Good eye, fixed!
    Reply
  • reunicorn
    20636062 said:
    This chip is slower than the 4790K it replaced in day-to-day task... after the meltdown/spectre fixes.

    Is your 7900X also slower than the 4790K with the patches applied on *both* processors? Because if the 4790K is only faster unpatched, it's not a fair comparison and I don't think you'd have any basis for a lawsuit.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    20636062 said:
    I want one of those "new" CPU's with the in-silicon fix. Intel, I just purchased a 7900X 2 months ago, I expect to have this CPU swapped out for a comparable "in-silicon fix" model.
    Are you nuts? Of course they won't replace it.

    20636062 said:
    If you will not offer replacements, we will sue.
    Then join one of the class action lawsuits and be prepared to wait a years. When it's all said and done, maybe you get enough to buy a bigger aftermarket heatsink. Then, at least you can O/C to get back some performance.
    ; )
    Reply
  • boju
    Worried about performance don't update or patch bios. Be smart and avoid the obvious clicks. I doubt very much this bug would take an affect on anyone.

    It took Google to discover this flaw and my speculation probably their ai program did it and not any human. Not that they'd admit that anyway.
    Reply
  • AgentLozen
    I thought this entire article was interesting. My favorite part was:

    Author said:
    Krzanich also later stated that the company expects to continue developing its 14nm products in 2018, so we could see yet another round of 14nm processors (sigh).

    This summarizes my feelings about the matter also. I'm wondering if Intel plans to follow the lead set by Broadwell and Skylake. That is - Cannon Lake might come out and be followed up with Ice Lake a month or two later. It feels like both CPUs have been baking in the over for a long time.

    I'm looking forward to the -5% power consumption and +3% IPC improvement! Bring it on!
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    I am surprised that they are already able to implement in silicon fixed for Meltdown/Specter. That probably means that they have known about it for quite a while longer than they say. Also would explain why 10nm is so late, probably found out about the problem just as Alpha chips were coming out and decided to fix the problem right away, therefore delaying 10nm chips by 18 months or so.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    20637333 said:
    I am surprised that they are already able to implement in silicon fixed for Meltdown/Specter.
    Nothing that surprising there: since part of the microcode fix is to make the speculative execution less aggressive, baking the fix which already has a soft-fix into silicon or changing its behavior to something more difficult to exploit should be a pretty minor tweak.

    I doubt mainstream CPUs designed primarily with speed in mind will ever be safe from side-channel exploits of one sort or another. Even specifically security-hardened CPUs aren't completely immune to side-channel exploits on their own and require software to go out of its way to scramble side-channel leaks. Guaranteeing security comes at a huge performance cost.
    Reply
  • wownwow
    From the clown-like Intel CEO:

    Before: NO BUG, our chips operate as designed and intended.
    Now: SILICON-BASED CHANGES, the products to be appear later this year.

    What a dishonest, shameless CEO!

    Intel keeps selling and launching faulty chips, what a dishonest, shameless company!

    People tolerate both well, what a beautiful world :-D
    Reply