Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
With curved ultra-wide monitors high on many gamer’s wish lists, the only obstacle is price. Though they’ve come down a bit since first appearing on the market, you’d usually have to shell out at least $600 or more for a 35-inch QHD screen like the Zero-G 35. Monoprice has certainly shaken things up with a $410 asking price and though some less-important features have been left out, everything you need for a satisfying gaming experience is there.
You won’t get a fancy adjustable stand, though the included one is very solid. And there are no speakers or USB ports. The overdrive is a bit weak, and there is no backlight strobe. But with a reliable 100Hz refresh rate, FreeSync (and even unofficial G-Sync support), accurate color with calibration and excellent contrast, games will display with rich detail and vibrant color. The image competes favorably with all but the most expensive premium screens.
Gaming monitors come in all shapes and sizes, but once you’ve experienced a 34 or 35-inch ultra-wide, it’s hard to go back to 16:9. If your budget hasn’t allowed for a curved 21:9 screen in the past, the Monoprice Zero-G 35 might be inexpensive enough to warrant an upgrade. Though it has a relatively slim feature list, its price/performance ratio is high. This is well worth considering for value-conscious shoppers.
MORE: Best Gaming Monitors
MORE: How We Test Monitors
MORE: All Monitor Content
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.
-
cryoburner If it's zero-g, why does it need a stand? <_<Reply
Are a lack of speakers really a con though? The speakers included in monitors are usually pretty bad. If you want speakers of that quality, you can probably find a set for $10 somewhere. Most gamers will likely be using either a headset or better speakers anyway.
Perhaps more worth noting would be that the limited FreeSync range means you won't get LFC to keep adaptive sync working when framerates dip below 48 fps. And while you might consider the resolution to be low enough to still get decent performance on "mid-priced" graphics cards, we're still talking about 2.4x the resolution of 1080p here, or nearly 35% more pixels than 1440p, so even with a $400 graphics card, performance is bound to dip into that range at times in some of the most demanding games with the settings turned up. -
DookieDraws Thanks for the review! Researching for a new monitor, and these reviews are helpful. Would love to see you review the AOC CU34G2X monitor soon. I guess you can call it a budget monitor, but it does have some pretty nice looking specs.Reply -
mrv_co Replycryoburner said:If it's zero-g, why does it need a stand? <_<
Are a lack of speakers really a con though? The speakers included in monitors are usually pretty bad. If you want speakers of that quality, you can probably find a set for $10 somewhere. Most gamers will likely be using either a headset or better speakers anyway.
Perhaps more worth noting would be that the limited FreeSync range means you won't get LFC to keep adaptive sync working when framerates dip below 48 fps. And while you might consider the resolution to be low enough to still get decent performance on "mid-priced" graphics cards, we're still talking about 2.4x the resolution of 1080p here, or nearly 35% more pixels than 1440p, so even with a $400 graphics card, performance is bound to dip into that range at times in some of the most demanding games with the settings turned up.
Yep, I consider no built-in speakers a feature. -
drivinfast247 Dang! At that price I'll probably pick one up to hold me off till a few of the newly announced monitors at CES actually release.Reply -
hacknslash730 Hi, I have this monitor and its great but I haven't been able to turn on G-sync? I have a GTX 1080, I'm using DP and freesync is turned on through OSD. What am I missing here? Thanks!Reply -
cryoburner Have you made sure your Nvidia drivers are up to date? If Freesync is enabled in your monitor's settings, you should be able to go into the "Set up G-Sync" menu in the Nvidia control panel and then select the monitor, check the box to "enable G-Sync Compatible", and then hit "apply".Reply
If the option doesn't appear, you might try going into the "Manage 3D Settings" menu in the Nividia control panel, where in the "Global settings" box you can try setting "Monitor Technology" to "G-Sync compatible".