Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Intel Core i7-4770K Surfaces on Two Dutch Webstores

By - Source: Hardware.info | B 28 comments

A pair of Dutch retailers currently feature the flagship CPU from Intel's upcoming range of Haswell processors.

The tray version of highly anticipated flagship of Intel's next generation Haswell processors, the i7-4770k has surfaced on the webstore of two Dutch stores, MaxICT and TakeItNow. The Core i7-4770K is unsurprisingly currently out of stock and is priced at €330 ($424.88) on MaxICT and €350 ($450.63) on TakeItNow which is of course higher than its predecessor, i7-3770K that currently retails for €316 ($406.85) in the Netherlands.

It is anyone's guess as to whether this price represents confirmation that Haswell will retail with a higher retail cost or if the two stores have simply inflated the price due to the early release date.

The product pages further indicate that the Core i7-4770K is a socket 1150 processor and will have a standard clock of 3.5 GHz. Screengrabs from Hardware.Info.

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

Discuss
Display all 28 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 23 Hide
    plasmastorm , March 20, 2013 7:15 AM
    you obviously....you commented....
Other Comments
  • 23 Hide
    plasmastorm , March 20, 2013 7:15 AM
    you obviously....you commented....
  • 4 Hide
    alvine , March 20, 2013 7:22 AM
    Ill stick with my 2550k for a while I guess
  • -3 Hide
    anxiousinfusion , March 20, 2013 7:27 AM
    Does this mean that US retail price will be
  • 1 Hide
    devBunny , March 20, 2013 7:40 AM
    Lol. At the very least, the people who were asking about the price in the review thread comments. ;o)
  • 0 Hide
    Murissokah , March 20, 2013 7:49 AM
    It's been a long time since I have seen any reason to upgrade your processor. Anyone with a 2500k or above is quite confortable already. This may be a great CPU, but will not be a game changer. At least Intel is being reasonable in not changing the socket platform. It would be very hard to justify a motherboard+CPU upgrade with no major improvement.
  • 1 Hide
    mt2e , March 20, 2013 7:50 AM
    2700k here, have not seen any reason to upgrade to Ivy or even Haswell, a what 10% performance jump each generation and no other real noticable upsides.

  • 2 Hide
    LukeCWM , March 20, 2013 7:54 AM
    Actually, as closely as I've been excitedly following the innovations behind Haswell, I'm not sure I care about this news either. You can't actually order them yet, these e-tailers don't actually have them, and the prices are almost certainly going to be inaccurate to the final release price. I think a more accurate price prediction would be the current going rate for the i7-3770k +$10-30.

    Even though I stated the reasons not to find this interesting above, I suppose it is just one further sign that Haswell actually exists and will actually be sold. Maybe that excites some people, but Intel is pretty reliable about releasing the products they have developed, especially in this market segment. :) 
  • 0 Hide
    aoneone , March 20, 2013 7:55 AM
    I have a 3770K and I'm very jealous... is it worth buying a new motherboard and cpu ? Ugh...
  • 7 Hide
    Memnarchon , March 20, 2013 8:00 AM
    Hmmm this look like a HUGE upgrade from my Q6600 :p . I hope this time this will not be solderless (already delayed the upgrade from Ivy to Haswell cause of this)... -.-
  • 5 Hide
    dominatorix , March 20, 2013 8:11 AM
    MurissokahIt's been a long time since I have seen any reason to upgrade your processor. Anyone with a 2500k or above is quite confortable already. This may be a great CPU, but will not be a game changer. At least Intel is being reasonable in not changing the socket platform. It would be very hard to justify a motherboard+CPU upgrade with no major improvement.

    ...but they change it the platform!! from socket 1155 to socket 1150!!
  • 7 Hide
    LukeCWM , March 20, 2013 8:19 AM
    lostmyclanintel made a big shot on the foot with 4770k... who will pay 350 bucks and another 200 bucks for 5% gain... we already have pci 3.0 usb 3.0 and thunderbolt on some mother boards...we really dont need that cpu for that price.

    Intel isn't trying to sell Haswell to someone who already owns Ivy. Think of it like the auto-industry: each generation of Ford needs to be competitive to Toyota and Chevrolet in order to sell, but in no way can you perceive it a failure if Ford doesn't sell 2013 vehicles to everyone who bought a 2012 vehicle.
  • 2 Hide
    nolarrow , March 20, 2013 8:29 AM
    Yeah, its about converting people from core2duos and quads. I bit the bullet and went with an i5 3570k recently from my q6600. If this chip was out I would have gone with something from that generation. No one should dump their i5/i7 2011+ for one of these unless you really need to.
  • 3 Hide
    InvalidError , March 20, 2013 8:32 AM
    MurissokahIt's been a long time since I have seen any reason to upgrade your processor. Anyone with a 2500k or above is quite confortable already.

    Enthusiasts and gamers aside, most people would still be perfectly fine with a Core2Duo. While my i5-3470 is ~2.5X as fast as my C2D-E8400 in theory, it only feels ~30% faster for most everyday use. The main reason I upgraded was that I really needed more than 8GB RAM but 16GB DDR2 cost nearly as much as i5+16GB DDR3+h77 and opens up the option of going for 32GB RAM later so sticking to my C2D made no sense.

    So there are at least three factors contributing to drops in conventional PC sales:
    - people do not need any more desktop processing power than they already have so they replace PCs less often
    - people replacing their aging desktops with better laptops
    - PCs getting knocked down people's priority list by smartphones, tablets, consoles, embedded platforms, etc. that can fulfill many of PCs' and laptops' traditional roles either by themselves or when combined with adequate accessories such as bluetooth keyboard/mouse.
  • 2 Hide
    annymmo , March 20, 2013 8:59 AM
    The biggest improvements and by that reasons to upgrade to a processor above the Core series are:
    - support for recently added hardware instructions (can make a huge speedup in some situations)
    - power savings for same or better computational power

    For me the power savings look interesting (quad core with base clock of 3.5GHz with 65W DTP)
  • 0 Hide
    LukeCWM , March 20, 2013 9:30 AM
    Although I'm always intrigued by advances in performance, I think Intel is right on the money with Haswell and their focus on power reduction. The public doesn't isn't currently complaining that their Facebook-accessing-device is too slow. But, of course, battery life does affect them! If they want to sell more products, significant advances in battery will have more public appeal than significant advances in performance. (At least until consumer software takes the next leap forward in how many resources it requires.)
  • 2 Hide
    Murissokah , March 20, 2013 9:40 AM
    dominatorix...but they change it the platform!! from socket 1155 to socket 1150!!


    Well, you are right! That got past me in my post-lunch slumber =)

    Just can't trust Intel to keep a platform long enough for us to consider a CPU-only upgrade.
  • 1 Hide
    blazorthon , March 20, 2013 9:53 AM
    MurissokahIt's been a long time since I have seen any reason to upgrade your processor. Anyone with a 2500k or above is quite confortable already. This may be a great CPU, but will not be a game changer. At least Intel is being reasonable in not changing the socket platform. It would be very hard to justify a motherboard+CPU upgrade with no major improvement.


    Intel is changing the socket.
  • 1 Hide
    CaedenV , March 20, 2013 12:20 PM
    mt2e2700k here, have not seen any reason to upgrade to Ivy or even Haswell, a what 10% performance jump each generation and no other real noticable upsides.

    10% increase was bigger than I was expecting. IB was only a 7% increase over SB, so a 10% boost is at least noteable.

    But then again, I am with you. I will be rocking my 2600 for a good long while yet. The issue is not one of if Intel could push more performance out of their newer chips... there is just very little that I do that sustains an appreciable load on my current processor. When I can play games at well under 50% load, why would I even think about upgrading? In a few years when next gen games start pushing hardware again then I will consider upgrading, but for now the only think I am hoping to upgrade in my system is a GPU with more onboard ram (but even my GPU performance is adequate, it is just some games like Skyrim that just eat all of the GDDR which then causes issues).

    Intel can call me back when they have true 8 core CPUs for under $350, and things like DDR4 and SATA4 are available.
  • 0 Hide
    hannibal , March 20, 2013 1:01 PM
    You allso noticed that the price goes up at least the same amount than the speed goes up... Hmmm... what else to expect in monopoly area... But very good chip for mobile devices though!
Display more comments