Best offers
|
4GB PC3-10600 1333MHz DDR3 DIMM Dual... | $67.99 Crucial Technology More info |
|
2GB PC2-6400 800MHz DDR2 SODIMM Memory | $27.99 Crucial Technology More info |
|
16GB Extreme III SDHC Card | $93.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
8GB Extreme III SDHC Memory Card | $79.99 Dell Home More info |
|
16GB Memory Stick PRO Duo Card | $89.99 Crutchfield.com More info |
- overclock ddr2 memory
- 4 gb ddr3 vs 8 gb ddr2
- ddr3 vs. ddr2 memory
- 4gb ddr2 system memory
- windows xp 4 gb memory
- ram timing vs frequency
- ddr3 memory prices
- is dual channel memory worth it
- overclocking memory ddr2
- ddr31333 vs ddr31600
- windows upgrade vista 32 seven 64
- ddr3 4gb memory
- force bios
- how to use 8 gb ram windows vista 32
- xp give me 3 gb memory
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
adventure :
Scoobydoo: Episode 2
The sequel of Scooby and Sammy's adventures. Same principle as in the previous episode (available on this website). Click on "Instructions" to see...
|
Sponsored links
Going For 4GB: DDR2-1066 Kit Round-Up
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (31) |
- Share
Table of contents
- 1 – 4 GB DDR2 Kits For the Masses
- 2 – Corsair Dominator TWIN2X4096-9136C5DF
- 3 – Crucial CT2Kit 4 GB
- 4 – Geil Black Dragon Evo One GE24GB1066C5DC
- 5 – Kingston HyperX KHX8500D2K2-4G
- 6 – Mushkin Ascent XP2-8500
- 7 – OCZ Flex II XLC PC2-9200
- 8 – Walton Chaintech Apogee GT AU2G732-12GH001
- 9 – Comparison Table, Test Setup
- 10 – Overclocking Summary
- 11 – Power Consumption
- 12 – No Performance Benchmarks?
- 13 – More Memory Performance Analysis
- 14 – Conclusion
- 15 – More on this topic
This is an excellent time to upgrade your main memory. Not only have memory prices come down to a level where 4 GB or even 8 GB of memory has become highly affordable, but a memory upgrade provides a positive impact with Windows Vista and an increasing number of game titles and applications. We looked at six 4 GB DDR2 memory kits, trying to find the best bang for the buck.
Intel will soon be releasing its Core i7 processor family, which will only support DDR3 memory due to the fact that the memory controller is about to be relocated from its traditional location on the northbridge right into the CPU. Combined with ramped-up production volumes, DDR3 memory has undergone significant price drops in recent months, finally making mainstream DDR3 memory attractive for the average Joe.
4 GB DDR2 Kits are Just Perfect
However, mainstream isn’t necessarily DDR3-1600 or faster, as many of you pointed out in the comments section of our recent DDR3-1600 roundup. It is DDR3-1066 and DDR3-1333. These are the speeds that have hit the market in ever larger quantities, to finally get to a point where DDR3 can take over from DDR2. However, this point is still pretty far away, looking at current memory prices for 2 GB and 4 GB memory kits, and the fact that even 8 GB kits have appeared at an almost acceptable cost. And let’s not forget that all AMD platforms depend on DDR2 memory (as do the majority of Intel systems).
While 4 GB of RAM cannot be fully utilized on 32-bit operating systems such as Windows XP and Windows Vista 32, you’ll still get between 3.3 and 3.7 GB of effective memory capacity. The exact figure depends on BIOS configuration, among other factors. We still believe that there is nothing wrong with purchasing a 4 GB dual channel memory kit, even if you won’t be able to utilize the entire capacity. Knowing that 2x 2 GB DDR2-800 kits start at as little as $80, that’s still a good deal.
Other Memory Options?
Utilizing more memory requires 64-bit versions of Windows XP or Vista, but the step from 3.3-3.7 GB usable capacity and the full 4 GB is small enough to be neglected in most of the applications today. 3+ GB of memory will provide sufficient capacity for 95% of all mainstream applications, and most of the high-end game titles as well. If you want more, you’ll have to switch the operating system, and that may still lead to driver issues. You’ll get 64-bit drivers for all core components, but the more you look around—think older printers, cell phone / smart phone drivers, and certain software—the more likely it is that you’ll get stranded in your quest for more memory.
Although 8 GB memory kits (which consist of four 2 GB DIMMs) are affordable, these only make sense if you have applications that really take advantage of the increased memory capacity and if it is worth going through the 32 to 64 bit transition. But these kits might give you the same headache as 3 GB kits, because all of them include four memory modules. This may force the BIOS to work with relaxed timings and can cause memory compatibility issues. We put together a short recommendation list to help you navigate the memory jungle.
Check List
Here is our recommendation for memory purchases, which will remain valid even for the next generation platforms:
- Stay within the market sweet spot to get a good deal: today that’s 2x 1 GB or 2x 2 GB of DDR2-800 or DDR2-1066 memory.
- Look for quick timings (smaller numbers are better), but don’t spend substantial money on slightly faster modules.
- Spend additional budget on a faster processor, a faster graphics card or a faster drive instead of fast memory, unless you need overclocking memory.
- Always get as few memory modules as possible, but equip all memory channels of a system to get maximum performance. The ideal configuration consists of two DIMMs today, and three DIMMs with Intel’s upcoming Core i7 systems.
- Go for name brand memory.
More Articles
Tom’s Ultimate RAM Speed Tests We cross-benchmarked DDR2 and DDR3 memory at various popular clock speeds and at both slow and fast timings. Is fast memory really worth it?
- Christmas Upgrade - Advice Please! [Homebuilt Systems]
- I have 3gb RAM, but XP only showing 2Gb? [Motherboards & Memory]
- Need New Memory Chip 240 Pin 800Mhz Dual Channel [Motherboards & Memory]
- Just Built, Small Problems (Well Bigish) [Motherboards & Memory]
- just got a GTX 260, Crysis lags like crazy,what else to change? [Games General]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Is AMD the better option for non over clockers?
- Help with a new build please
- Dead PSU? How to check
- Recommend me a new motherboard
- Need help with upgrade decision
- Overclocking e5200
- OVERCLOCK NEED A STEP BY STEP FROM PEEPS NOT A GUIDE!
- X2 4400 vs X2 4800 S939 Overclocking
- First computer with: 3D, Triboot, SLI, Water Cooling, and Overclocking
- Underclocking/Overclocking: The Speed needed?
- Question on ram timings
- GA-P31-ES3G LGA Kingston Hyper X KHX8500D2K2/4GR
- RAM For Asus Maximus Formula
- Best Mobo for Phenom II?







Hmm, then this is a really good deal then:
kingston hyperx for $75 with shipping
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820104060
But even then, prices in the article seem rather high don't they? Just wait for a rebate on the RAM and get it then, hell OCZ has had a new rebate continually for the last 3 months.
I don't know about this...
What with Nehalem, the X58 and DDR3, upgrading DDR2 seems like a cheap and temporary thrill.
What about this memory kit; I have it and love it...
http://www.patriotmem.com/products [...] 576&type=1
Runs rock stable on my 780G based board and this kit can be had for as little as $90. Was there some reason this memory was not included in the tests?
I use the Kingston mem on 1.066MHz with 4-4-4-12 timings on 2.2V and it is running stable for eight months now. Deffo a go.
SenseR.
lol I love how DDR2-667 performs within .2% of DDR3-1066
For me, DDR2-800 seems like a decent way to go. It can be found online for $60 for a 2x2GB set. I'm just rolling with a basic set of 2x2GB DDR2-800 XMS2 from Corsair. It runs fairly fast and cool; haven't tried overclocking them yet, though.
They are all overclocked 800mhz ics amnyway so it doesn't matter. You can but pc6400 modules that do 1066 - 1200 with ease these days. Tom should have picked specific ram ic's like micron d9's , promos, and a few other good ones and compared the overclocking that way.
Good Day
Wow that could have actually been a useful article if only you had done the test on an AMD system as well...
Wow that could have actually been a useful article if only you had done the test on an AMD system as well...
I was thinking the exact same thing. I think it's pretty well known, at least here, that you see little difference between DDR frequencies when they're above the Bus speed (for those processors still using the north bridge as a memory controller).
I would really like to see comparisons between DDR2 memory with a Phenom. I was looking for this the other day and turned up with little direct comparisons of DDR2-800 vs 1066. It'd be a really good article to read, and one that I think Tom's should jump on. It'd also give people a chance to see what an IMC can do and maybe help some people out when they're picking out DDR3 for their Core i7's.
I think writers @ Toms has to learn what Overclocking percentage means...
100% overclock is running it twice as fast as spec.
so running at 106% overclock is more then twice as fast?
I think their concept of overclocking percentages is mixed up.
bleh, these are the best high clock ddr2s on the market. guess they don't qualify since they are 1100mhz lolz.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820231194
Hmm, then this is a really good deal then:kingston hyperx for $75 with shippinghttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820104060But even then, prices in the article seem rather high don't they? Just wait for a rebate on the RAM and get it then, hell OCZ has had a new rebate continually for the last 3 months.
That isn't the same Kingston ram featured in this article. The timing for that RAM is 7-7-7-20, although it is very affordable. I'm thinking of picking up a set of it myself.
According to OCZ's own website:
Important Note: Due to the width of the heatsink, Flex II memory kits cannot be installed on motherboards that require the modules to be inserted in sockets side by side. A maximum of one Flex II dual channel kit will fit on any motherboard with dual sockets.
I guess it's a good thing this review was done on an Asus board with staggered memory channels (A->B->A->B). If your motherboard groups your memory channels (like my old Gigabyte and Asus boards, i.e. A->A->B->B) then these modules will be worthless as they will be running in single-channel (cause you couldn't put two modules on the same memory channel). I think this fact alone means they are worthless as performance memory. You'd get better performance out of 667-dual channel if you have a mother board with grouped memory channels.
there's nothing interesting with memory technologies since before DDR2 came out. now, the FSB and RAMs had catch up with the CPU not like before.
but there's an interesting comment i've read above. Why not test a quad core with a heavily threaded application, i'm sure there will be big differences in memory/ram speeds.
ddr2-800 is as fast as it gets with sane fsb400. overclocking higher than fsb 400, ddr2-800 is only usefull untill ddr2-1066, fsb 533.
And like said before, most ddr2-800 kits go to 1066 with relative ease.
EVERYTHING above fsb 533/ ddr1066 is useless. Face it, acknowledge it, learn it.
Daredevils that push their system to 600+fsb do so for a very short of time just to prove that they can. Not many of those and usefulness of these test is debatable.
Where the heck is G.Skill... Would beat all of these in clean..
Heppy customer of G.Skill for several years..
Ummm... Am I the only one that knows about PAE???
Besides the fact that you didn't do all your homework the article was very well written and informative. Thanks
~Cheers
P.S. Next article idea... PAE and how it home users can benefit from it. BTW i do not recommend PAE if you use non-standard devices as it can have issues with drivers.
What is PAE? I dont know about it. Please share
What is PAE? I dont know about it. Please share
PAE stands for Physical Address Extension or something like that
so... its useless. ok
I really cant think of a single reason one shouldn't use win xp x64 instead of win xp 32bit- save for 16bit app support (think old dos games, that can be run on dosbox anyway..)
so... its useless. ok
No for some programs it is probably really cool