5 GHz Project: CPU Cooling With Liquid Nitrogen

Record Attempt: The 5 GHz Project, Continued

Only liquid nitrogen can produce ideal processor cooling - in this case from our 25 liter transport container.

Experience gathered in past investigations told us that these kind of clock rates can only be achieved on the P4 platform. Nonetheless, as we prepared for each test, we had no clear idea which clock rates would be reached in conjunction with selected components. Our last speed record is exactly a year old. Then we succeeded in getting an Intel Pentium 4/3.06 to operate stably at 4.1 GHz. A few days later we showed how an AMD AthlonXP works at 2.8 GHz. The basis for these tests was a powerful compressor cooling system from Chip-con with a few modifications. Ten months later, with the same basic configuration, we managed to overclock the first 64 bit processor on the desktop market - the AMD Athlon64 FX. The end of the flagpole was reached at 2.8 GHz. Anyone really interested in extreme overclocking should read the following articles :

An image from the preconditioning phase : it was by no means certain which clock rate we’d eventually reachAn image from the preconditioning phase : it was by no means certain which clock rate we’d eventually reach

Extreme Heat Dissipation : 1600 KW Per Square Meter !

Nothing produces as much heat dissipation per square meter as a modern processor. There is certainly nothing in everyday life to compare it with. In the case of our Intel Pentium 4 (the 3.2 GHz version in our example), whose die surface comprises 112 square millimeters, the heat dissipation is up to 84 watts at maximum load. In plain English : 84 watts on a surface of 1.12 square centimeters - the size of a fingertip ! Extrapolated to square meters that make 840,000 watts or 840 kW. As a point of comparison : a good household iron has maximum heat output of 2,000 watts and emits this over a surface of approx. 200 square centimeters. That adds up to 10 watts per square centimeter. Our regular 3.2 GHz P4 CPU radiates more than eight times this thermal output.

Heat dissipation rises exponentially during extreme overclocking In the past we recorded about 135 watts using the Chip-con compressor at 4.1 GHz. Using our nitrogen cooling to break the 5 GHz sound barrier would produce peak heat dissipation of up to 180 watts emitted from a die surface area of 1.12 square centimeters. Applied to our example that means 1,600,000 watts, 1,600 kW or 1.6 MW per square meter. By this point it must be clear how important efficient processor cooling is. But with simple means there is no way around the problem. Compared to our past extreme overclocking tests, requirements on CPU cooling have risen enormously.


Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
6 comments
    Your comment
  • jayh619
    So would u have to cool it constantly? or.. wat?
    -1
  • Anonymous
    If they stopped cooling it the processor would die.
    0
  • Anonymous
    Now, with that big of a heatsink how do you plan to close the tower? How do you plan to renew the liquid nitrogen without blowing up your PC
    0
  • Anonymous
    you will notice that this was done outside... so not very safe I bet. Also you would never be able to keep switching the system on and off as the ice would damage the pc
    0
  • NEOhm
    I couldn't help but think that there was a lot more they could have done to insulate the rest of the system from the CPU's immediate area .... I'm sure this system must have gone onto a crashing spree once all that ice built up and started short-circuiting all those electronics around the CPU's base .... for one example, they could have gone as far as to coating that area with silicone, i would think; or in the vary least, covering that area more to protect from the super cooled 'steam' flowing over the top of the copper tube and down onto the motherboard.

    Secondly, the over-use of thermal pastes ... from my understanding, application of thermal paste between a chip and a heatsink is supposed to be EXTREMELY THIN and evenly spread; any excess paste REDUCES thermal performance and just splotching it on can easily introduce air bubbles which would cause 'hot-spots' wherever a bubble lies.

    If your going to draw attention to yourself by breaking some world records, it would be probably a good idea to do everything you can to make everything as perfect as can be ... for example, cleaning up the copper soldiering residues to 'good enough' levels isn't Good Enough!, go all the way and use scouring pads, polish and some attention to detail and people will respect you the more for your efforts and clean presentation. A key to success in life = Strive for excellence in whatever you do! Don't settle for second-best.
    0
  • Zorg
    I know it's late, but you guys are clowns.

    They did it and then took it apart and threw it in a box. Sorry it won't fit in a case and it wasn't shiny enough for you nitpickers.

    Let me know how cool yours is when you get done.

    If you're going to post garbage then don't post at all.
    0