Best offers
|
TX850W 850W Power Supply (ATX,... | $139.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
TruePower Quattro 1000W Power Supply | $201.29 PC Connection More info |
|
EarthWatts 650 650W Power Supply | $125.99 STAPLES More info |
|
ThermalTake / PurePower W0100RU /... | $54.99 Directron More info |
|
TruePower 550 Watt Power Supply | $101.68 Compuvest More info |
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
Sponsored links
As is typical of workstation systems, the power supply features a four-pin P4 connector and an eight-pin variety for dual-CPU systems. The ATX/EPS plug comes in a 24-pin version, so an adapter is required for normal ATX motherboards. Besides a single floppy connector, the power supply has eleven 5.25" Molex connectors. Some graphics cards get their power via the smaller floppy connector, in which case you need an adapter if you also want to run a disk drive with the computer.
Another wire from the power supply goes to a status LED, which can be run up to the front of the computer system for monitoring current power supply status.

The cables are designed for the server and workstation segment.
Performance
Since the power supply is redundant, it had to go through our rigorous test run twice. First we let it run comfortably at half load on both units with their combined 500 W output; then we simulated failure of one unit so we could see what one of them alone was capable of.

Nameplate for the combined unit: it's all here

Each sub-unit also has its own nameplate
As anticipated, there were no stability problems in redundant operation of any kind, and all the numbers were within the specifications.
The simulated failure of one input unit failed to stress the device. Even at full load, power remained constant to all areas without even a slight drop in voltage being observed. The TC-500R8P also was dutiful in reporting any problems.
Our endurance test running on only a single functioning power supply likewise failed to pose a problem for the I-Star power converter, as all voltages remained within specifications.
The redundant design naturally makes efficiency suffer. It registered 67% on half load, which is quite low; during "failure" of one supply input this figure rises to 68%. At very low load it looks much the same with an efficiency of only 55%, though it does go up to 60% when one input says "sayonara". It quickly became evident that this power supply is designed for running at full load when we repeated our measurement at maximum load. In redundant mode, the power supply reached its top value of exactly 72%, which fell to 70% with one unit down. Standby mode didn't look any better, as on low load the efficiency was a meager 17%, though it did register 41% at high load.
With server and workstation systems the prime focus is naturally on failure-proofing, and efficiency is only a secondary consideration.
The price of this power supply is not yet available.
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- What computers did you own in the old days? Share your story!
- Actual deneb review/comparison to Intel
- Newegg and 790GX: A matchmade in heaven?
- Huge Workstation Build
- Selling Lawsuits AMD Vs Intel
- Overclocking E7200 w/ stock cooling
- Unsure about C2D temperatures
- New Water Cooling setup
- AMD64 3500+ stable OC, but visual errors in high-end games?
- Pentium D 805
- What are the differences between these RAM?
- First Build, First Post, Need HELP!!!
- Vote on your favorite Motherboard
- Is Ageia\'s PhysX Failing?





