Russian Researchers Develop Chipmaking Tool that Can Replace Litho Tools
Russia wants to make chips too.
Researchers from St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (SPbPU) have developed a domestic lithographic complex for mask-less chip production using etching, an important towards Russia's microelectronics self-sufficiency, reports CNews, citing state-owned RIA Novosti. One of the tools costs five million rubles ($49.5 thousand), the price of a modern car, and the cost of another is unknown.
The complex consists of two tools. The first device is designed for "maskless nanolithography," it projects images onto substrates without a mask. The second tool, which builds on the substrate patterns made by the first, is responsible for forming nanostructures using etching. Furthermore, this installation can craft silicon membranes for applications such as ship overpressure sensors. Notably, these membranes are touted to be more reliable and sensitive than those produced by other methods.
Russia's advancements in microelectronics come amidst its broader struggle to keep pace with global chip-making standards. Currently, the nation is limited to a 65nm process technology in chip production. Global standards, meanwhile, have already scaled down to a 3nm process. Another noteworthy endeavor is by the Nizhny Novgorod Institute of Applied Physics (IAP RAS), which aims to pioneer a lithograph capable of 7 nm chip production, albeit not until 2028. Adding to the momentum, the Ministry of Industry and Trade has invested 1.1 billion rubles in developing lithographic materials specific to microelectronics.
Beyond making chips or silicon membranes, these two installations can significantly benefit other industries. For instance, they can increase the lifespan of radar equipment by over 20 times. In the realm of green energy, these tools can miniaturize solar panels, making them lighter and enhancing their efficiency.
The developers have grand visions for their invention. They are considering incorporating artificial intelligence into both machines to amplify their capabilities. However, it remains unclear if Russian chip manufacturers have expressed interest in these devices, and there's no timeline for when the tools will be deployed in real-world production.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
dalek1234 I believe everything quoted in this article because when something comes out of russia, it's always true. 🤣🤣🤣Reply -
peachpuff Those researchers better not be lying, the last hypersonic missile scientist was arrested on treason charges because the missile wasn't actually hypersonic...Reply -
helper800 <<Quoted material removed by moderator>>Reply
You've got other problems if you cannot believe people are capable of writing critical articles about their own ethnic, cultural, or origin countries government. -
ivan_vy is not professional to attack the editors, we can choose not to read the articles. Poeple reporting news are not responsible if they develop or not as intended in years to come. Also Mr. Shilov might be have the language advantage to have a broader insigt in russian topics so it's natural to produce more articles in the matter.Reply -
helper800 <<Quoted material removed by moderator>>Reply
My only point was that it is illogical to see an article written by anyone, read their last name, and then make unrelated assumptions about motive. We should be able to objectively read this article and judge it on its contents rather than point fingers because of who wrote it. -
Lophoph1
You're right. What I said was unfair. And it as very speculative. The idea I really meant to convey was for others to use critical thinking to determine the validity of articles by examining the source. Determine if there is a conflict of interest and determine if there are any other reputable sources with the same information. Don't believe everything you read. But don't disregard facts based on biases. Always dig deeper.ivan_vy said:is not professional to attack the editors, we can choose not to read the articles. Poeple reporting news are not responsible if they develop or not as intended in years to come. Also Mr. Shilov might be have the language advantage to have a broader insigt in russian topics so it's natural to produce more articles in the matter. -
helper800
Agreed!Lophoph1 said:You're right. What I said was unfair. And it as very speculative. The idea I really meant to convey was for others to use critical thinking to determine the validity of articles by examining the source. Determine if there is a conflict of interest and determine if there are any other reputable sources with the same information. Don't believe everything you read. But don't disregard facts based on biases. Always dig deeper. -
bit_user So, let's examine the claim. If it's not using masks, the only way I can see how it works is by using a steerable beam. If true, then how long will it possibly take to trace out all the circuit structures?Reply
Or, maybe it works like a raster-scan. Again, I'd be concerned that it won't scale well to larger circuits.
It sure would be nice to get more details on the underlying theory of operation! -
bit_user
If you want to hear about technical developments in Russia, you need someone not only fluent in Russian but also knowledgeable of the scientific and technical jargon. Same with China.Lophoph1 said:This article was written by a Russian.
I think Anton and Zhiye are assets to the site. We should be appreciative of their efforts to keep us abreast of developments in these countries. Don't assume their ethnicity has anything to do with their political views. -
bit_user
AFAIK, authors and editors of the site generally don't have moderator privileges, in the forums.BX4096 said:I don't know if it was actually he who removed it, but whoever abuses their mod powers like this, clearly doesn't do it for objective reasons.
Furthermore, in politically-charged threads, don't be surprised if a moderator deletes your post without reading it carefully enough to pick up on nuance.