Western Digital doubles the performance of hard drives with dual-actuator High-Bandwidth, with path to 8X performance increase — Power-Optimized HDDs will reduce power by 20 percent

Roadmap
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Although NAND memory has replaced traditional hard disk drives in the vast majority of client PCs, HDDs can still offer capacities at costs not achievable by solid-state drives today, particularly in the data center space. In a bid to retain the relevance of hard drives for years to come, Western Digital on Tuesday announced two distinct families of HDDs: one aimed at applications that require maximum performance and decent IOPS-per-TB, another designed for power-optimized applications that value limited power consumption and predictable performance.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

With contributions from
  • Kindaian
    And what is the cost in terms of endurance of the disks?
    Reply
  • LordVile
    In continuous read and writes sure but IOPS will still be far lower
    Reply
  • FunSurfer
    Current SATA III connection maximum speed is 550–600 MB/s, usually HDD operates at 100 MB/s, so how will it reach X8 speed, 800 MB/s? Will it work with other communication type, like USB, PCIe or NVMe?
    Reply
  • MosephV
    FunSurfer said:
    Current SATA III connection maximum speed is 550–600 MB/s, usually HDD operates at 100 MB/s, so how will it reach X8 speed, 800 MB/s? Will it work with other communication type, like USB, PCIe or NVMe?
    My guess is SAS, which has double the bandwidth of SATA III. It's also the most common interface for spinning rust in the data center
    Reply
  • Dr Kay
    FunSurfer said:
    Current SATA III connection maximum speed is 550–600 MB/s, usually HDD operates at 100 MB/s, so how will it reach X8 speed, 800 MB/s? Will it work with other communication type, like USB, PCIe or NVMe?
    I was going to ask EXACTLY the same question and I think these HDD manufacturers might adopt the PCI E interface for faster speeds as you already stated that the SATA III interface max's out at around 550- 600 MB/s so if they do manage 8 x the speed of today's fastest HDD's then 8 x 600 MB/s = 4,800 MB/s which is inline of PCI E gen 4 or 5 speed's. I do apologise if I've made any mistakes in my maths or reasoning .
    Reply
  • Shiznizzle
    SATA transfer speeds in the lab do not translate to real world scenarios.

    People today tend to shove and cram their cables in bunches into the back which does interfere with signal strength. I am getting 170 to 180 with one reading head so my guess is with two we could be looking at 300MB/s which is not shabby for spinning rust. Put a few drives in an array and numbers go up further.

    just glad they moved away from SMR.
    Reply
  • twin_savage
    Shiznizzle said:
    I am getting 170 to 180 with one reading head so my guess is with two we could be looking at 300MB/s which is not shabby for spinning rust. Put a few drives in an array and numbers go up further.
    I'm getting 587MB/s out of the old first generation mach.2 drives on sequential workloads; I'd expect these new WD drives to be atleast that good.


    EDIT:
    I just realized there is a picture in the article claiming the drives can transfer at 554.1MB/s
    Reply
  • twin_savage
    Dr Kay said:
    was going to ask EXACTLY the same question and I think these HDD manufacturers might adopt the PCI E interface for faster speeds
    back 2021 the new NVMe 2.0 spec added in hard drives, but IIRC they only allow them to be linked at 2 lanes instead of 4.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    Dr Kay said:
    I was going to ask EXACTLY the same question and I think these HDD manufacturers might adopt the PCI E interface for faster speeds as you already stated that the SATA III interface max's out at around 550- 600 MB/s so if they do manage 8 x the speed of today's fastest HDD's then 8 x 600 MB/s = 4,800 MB/s which is inline of PCI E gen 4 or 5 speed's. I do apologise if I've made any mistakes in my maths or reasoning .
    Rotational delay. Sorry, meant seek delay, just that much less of it.
    Reply
  • JRStern
    Cool. Head per track, fixed. Aka "drum". Back to 1965! OK at about a billion times the capacity, LOL.

    Now wait, I thought I was kidding, but given another three seconds consideration - perhaps such a thing could actually be done? If so, OMG.
    Reply