Raspberry Pi AI HAT+ 2 Review: The brains and the brawn

DIY AI LLMs

Raspberry Pi AI HAT+ 2
(Image credit: © Future)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Offloading the work from the Raspberry Pi's CPU makes the AI HAT+ 2 an interesting prospect, but the flawed results make this a bit of a gamble. The $130 price tag and your project choice will ultimately decide your purchasing decision.

Pros

  • +

    Easy to use

  • +

    Portable edge LLM

  • +

    Offloads AI work from Pi CPU

  • +

    Similar image inference performance to previous model

Cons

  • -

    Big cost

  • -

    Performance is just better than Pi CPU

  • -

    Only works with compatible models

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Raspberry Pi’s first product of 2026 is an update of the 2024 AI HAT+, but this newer version, another collaboration with Hailo, now sees the Hailo 10H AI chip running the show, along with 8GB of onboard RAM. The new AI HAT+ 2 takes the strain of AI workloads away from the Raspberry Pi 5’s Arm CPU, but this all comes at a price of $130. With your Raspberry Pi already costing much more than the original $35 — of course, the spec has vastly improved over the years — you could already be hitting the $200 mark for just a Pi and AI HAT+ 2. Does the performance warrant the price? There's only one way to find out!

Raspberry Pi AI HAT+ 2 Specifications

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Les Pounder
Associate Editor

Les Pounder is an associate editor at Tom's Hardware. He is a creative technologist and for seven years has created projects to educate and inspire minds both young and old. He has worked with the Raspberry Pi Foundation to write and deliver their teacher training program "Picademy".

  • bit_user
    Thanks for looking at accuracy, and not just timing. What's really needed is to run one of the LLM benchmark suites, so that accuracy can be scored over a statistical number of tests. Then, we'd have a rough idea of its relative accuracy vs. the CPU.

    I think it's incumbent on Raspberry Pi to provide accuracy data for their product running a few models + some script that we can use to try it for ourselves. It's pretty sad that they can get away with releasing such a product without even telling us how accurately it runs certain models (i.e. compared to some baseline hardware & precision).

    As for the hardware, even the 20 TOPS rate for int8 seems absurd to me, given that it's probably using LPDDR4X at 32-bit. It should be highly bottlenecked on memory bandwidth. A much better use of that DRAM (or hardware budget) would be simply putting it on the Pi 5 base board.

    BTW, Jeff Geerling ran a few more benchmarks and found the CPU often to outperform the new hat. However, I think he did not attempt to evaluate the accuracy of either's responses. He found some of the vision examples didn't run. Someone in his comments pointed out that the NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super would be a much better choice (although its 8 GB of RAM is shared between CPU & GPU).
    Reply