AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT Review: The Lateral Pass

New architecture, similar performance.

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT reference card photos
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

4K ultra will often be too much for the RX 7800 XT to handle, at least when running without any form of upscaling. As with the 1080p medium results, we will only provide limited commentary here. There are certainly games where 4K ultra is viable, and there are other games and settings (like basically everything with ray tracing) where you'll need to adjust your expectations.

AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT performance charts

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Overall, 4K ultra shows the biggest gap between the RX 7800 XT and RTX 4060 Ti. AMD's new GPU now leads by 37% overall. That's partly because the 4060 Ti 8GB card does run out of VRAM capacity in several games, resulting in a relatively massive hit to performance.

For example, in Watch Dogs Legion, the 7800 XT leads by 73%, up from 54% at 1440p and 45% at 1080p ultra — it's one of the games where ultra settings, even without ray tracing, can surpass 8GB of VRAM use. Far Cry 6 has a similar 77% gap between the two cards, compared to 46% at 1440p ultra and 32% at 1080p ultra. Forza Horizon 5, Borderlands 3, Spider-Man, Control, and Bright Memory Infinite also show about a 20% shift in relative performance compared to the 1440p results.

This is the one case where the doubled VRAM of the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB can actually show some benefit. However, there's not enough horsepower in the GPU to really take advantage of the extra memory, and raw memory bandwidth doesn't improve. Still, the overall margins between the 7800 XT and 4060 Ti 16GB are closer than on the 8GB card, with AMD holding a 30% lead across the 15-game test suite.

It's also noteworthy that while 8GB of memory clearly starts to run into capacity bottlenecks in our test suite, the same can't be said of 12GB cards like the RTX 4070. The RTX 4070 is still 5% faster than the RX 7800 XT across our full test suite, down from being 6% faster at 1440p ultra — so a 2% net change, but nothing massive.

That's not to say there aren't games and settings where even 12GB of VRAM can prove insufficient, but none of the games in our current test suite fall into that category, and the visual benefits of 16GB versus 12GB are often negligible, at least on games that are coded in a reasonably optimal fashion.

We'll look at a few more games on the next page that may push VRAM use harder than previous-generation games like the ones in our test suite. Otherwise, enjoy the other 4K charts below.

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • oofdragon
    IMO its good at $500 since its on par with 6950XT when overclocked. Lets be honest It should have been at least a hair faster than the 6950XT at factory settings but since its $100 cheaper and virtually runs games just the same, its a solid offering. I feel though that at 1440p a card like the 6800XT is plenty enough, now at around $400 on eBay... and while the 7700XT could be a good deal at around that price, we also have the RX6800 with 16GB for $100 less......

    My two cents then, anyone into 60fps gaming should just stick with the 6700XT for 1080p and 6800XT for 1440p, why spend more to get the same? At 4K theres the 7900 series for $700/$800 playing any game just the same as the 4090 at half the price, AMD is a no brainer this gen. I went 7900 also for high refresh 1440p and that single game worth playing with RT enabled
    Reply
  • AgentBirdnest
    From the perspective of a 1440p RTX 2060 owner - who has had my heart set on, and has been saving up for an RTX 4070 for the last few months, I have to say:

    I wish I bought a Free-Sync instead of G-Sync monitor (there was no "G-Sync compatible" at the time.) Because the 7800XT is mighty compelling. 4070-like performance for $100 cheaper, and even the ray-tracing performance is close enough that I probably wouldn't notice in most games. A 50-watt difference is actually enough to make me uncomfortable after an hour of gaming in this room. But for $100 less than the 4070, I might be able to live with that.
    But I can't live without my variable refresh rate, and am not willing to splurge on a new monitor that I don't need. So, a higher-priced card for me, unless Nvidia drops the price a few bucks or makes a compelling Super-refresh before the end of the year, but I won't hold my breath.

    The 7700xt is just... puzzling. All I have to say is, "Why?"

    As always, props for the great review, Jarred! I haven't read through every page just yet, I'll do that a bit later. But the benchmarks and analysis I saw so far look great. Thanks for the hard work.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    It's a better 6800XT at a lower price, nothing exciting as far as generational leap goes but it beats every card at its price point.
    Reply
  • Frozoken
    Just so u know u absolutely need to undervolt amd cards when overclocking them to get extra performance. Techpowerup was seeing roughly 15% gains in fps from their oc
    Reply
  • Avro Arrow
    Elusive Ruse said:
    It's a better 6800XT at a lower price, nothing exciting as far as generational leap goes but it beats every card at its price point.
    Sure, but it's SUPPOSED to do that. The cost per frame is SUPPOSED to go down every generation. Remember how the $500 RTX 3070 was slightly faster than the $1200 RTX 2080 Ti? That's what's supposed to happen.

    The RX 7800 XT is supposed to be Navi 31, just like the RX 6800 XT is Navi 21. AMD is royally screwing people here with a deceptive naming scheme.
    Reply
  • Colif
    it competes well against 4070 if you don't use RT, and its cheaper.
    It walks all over both 4060 models.

    neither AMD or Nvidia have a perfect record this generation when it comes to naming really.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Avro Arrow said:
    Sure, but it's SUPPOSED to do that. The cost per frame is SUPPOSED to go down every generation. Remember how the $500 RTX 3070 was slightly faster than the $1200 RTX 2080 Ti? That's what's supposed to happen.

    The RX 7800 XT is supposed to be Navi 31, just like the RX 6800 XT is Navi 21. AMD is royally screwing people here with a deceptive naming scheme.
    I don't buy GPUs based on their names. For me it's quite simple; I buy the best bang for my buck regardless of the badge and name.
    Reply
  • Upacs
    Elusive Ruse said:
    I don't buy GPUs based on their names. For me it's quite simple; I buy the best bang for my buck regardless of the badge and name.
    Exactly. What matters is price/performance ratio (and features and stability). Naming is irrelevant and only for the clueless consumer that assumes higher is always better. But none of those here, right?
    Reply
  • Why_Me
    This looks to be a decent card for 1080P, not so much for 1440.
    Reply
  • PEnns
    I am really tempted to buy the 6800 XT and call it a day (and wait for another 2-3 years maybe).

    The 7800 XT seemed like a decent new card - but the deal breaker was the loudness but nothing else really.
    Reply