Asus ROG Swift PG279QM Review: Fantastic 240 Hz Performance, Color, and Flexibility

The Asus ROG Swift PG279QM is a 27-inch QHD/IPS gaming monitor with 240 Hz, Rec.2020 color, HDR, Adaptive-Sync, and fantastic performance.

Asus ROG Swift PG279QM
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Asus ROG Swift PG279QM is one of the best gaming monitors I’ve reviewed, and one of the best all-around displays too. With perfect video processing, smooth gaming performance and tons of rich and accurate color.

Pros

  • +

    + Huge color gamut with selectable modes

  • +

    + Accurate out of the box

  • +

    + Faultless video processing

  • +

    + Premium build quality

Cons

  • -

    No flaws of consequence

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

There are many 27 and 32-inch QHD displays that run at 165 Hz, but 240 Hz is quickly becoming more common. I've found that monitors of any resolution running at that speed take on a smoothness that transcends the pixel count. Asus' new ROG Swift PG279QM achieves these speeds at 1440p. It's far faster than I covered its 165 Hz predecessor, the PG279Q, that I reviewed in 2016.

Though the Ultra HD monitor category garners all the attention these days, fast QHD panels are still the ones to beat for balanced performance. With fewer than half the pixels to move around, they are capable of very high frame rates and, consequently, higher motion resolution. A static image will be sharper on a UHD monitor, but a moving image can be more detailed and lifelike when a QHD monitor is running over 200 Hz.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

  • waltc3
    Couple of major flaws for me @ an $840 price point: It's way too small, imo, but I'm prejudiced because once you go to 43" you won't go back...;) The HDR is really lacking...HDR 400 is barely into the DisplayHDR spec, frankly. I had a 32" BenQ with HDR 400, and it's nowhere near as nice as my present DisplayHDR 1000 monitor. Last, it's limited to 1440P--I think that 4k is a must in a monitor in this price range. I think that all too often people get side-tracked by supposed Hz of the monitor and forget about everything else...;) It's hard to beat a wide color gamut combined with DisplyHDR1000 certification, imo. Cut this price in half, and it would be far more interesting.
    Reply
  • Findecanor
    It could be worth explaining that Rec.2020 had been designed to be wider than what any available display is able to reproduce. It had been designed to cater to future improvements in display technology.

    Therefore, there is no actual "Rec.2020 display". like there are displays that support 100% sRGB or DCI P3.
    Reply
  • PRIFORCE
    No Hdmi 2.1?
    Reply