CPU-Usage Benchmarks: MPEG-2 Codec
Now we will move on to the MPEG-2 codec. As usual, we'll start with the AMD platforms:
All of the results are close, and although the GeForce 8200 has slightly higher utilization, it performs better than it did with the H.264 codec. Once again, keep in mind that the AMD solutions are also producing excellent noise cancellation in addition to low CPU utilization.
The G45 and GeForce 9300 results are neck-and-neck again.
As long as you are talking about HTPC builds though, you might want to mention temps... aren't the 9300/9400 boards very hot?
this is in fact an excellent power supply... if you use it. at 100watts load it has a "cool" 76% efficency. if the intel pc uses less than 82watts in load and 66watts in idle you can only imagine the efficency a power supply has at below 5% load. the site suggest around 65% so instead of having a proper power supply using 40watts or less when idle, you get this "green" efficient hummer who swollows 66w. i really like you articles guys but this kind of testing is not the way to go.
i posted some link but i see it's been removed. that review said something about 65% minimum.
"For the last CPU utilization test, we will check the capability of these graphic chipsets to accelerate picture-in-picture (PIP) video streams. To do this, we will use the Blu-ray dick Sunshine, which utilizes the H.264 codec and features PIP commentary during playback."
on page 6
i did NOT know this...
i thought only way to listen to uncompressed audio on blu-ray was using Asus Xonar HDAV 1.3 audio card to bitstream to your receiver...
it's nice to know that IGP has enough power to handle 1080p while streaming HD audio codec....