When you look at it from the side, Seagate's Laptop Ultrathin HDD is almost easy to miss. Measuring just 5 mm tall, it’s one of the thinnest hard drives in existence. We got our hands on the 500 GB model to see if it can keep up with larger disks.
Laptop Ultrathin HDD Tech Specs And Benchmark System
Technical Specifications
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Manufacturer
Seagate
Model
Laptop Ultrathin HDD
Model Number
ST500LT032
Interface
SATA 6 Gb/s
Form Factor
2.5" (5 mm)
Capacity
500 GB
RPM
5400 RPM
Platters
1
Cache
16 MB
Operating Temperature
0-60°C
Maximum Data Transfer Rate (Official Specifications)
100 MB/s
Power Consumption at Idle (Official Specifications)
IOMeter 2006.07.27 File Server Benchmark Web Server Benchmark Database Benchmark Workstation Benchmark Streaming Reads Streaming Writes 4 KB Random Reads 4 KB Random Writes
System Software and Drivers
Software / Driver
Details
Operating System
Windows 7 x64 Ultimate SP1
Intel Inf
9.2.0.1030
Intel Rapid Storage
10.5.0.1026
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
For the hard drive being benchmarked, is it possible for tomshardware to color the text to make them easier to find in the list?
for example http://i.imgur.com/VXwTs6y.jpg
it only takes about 3 seconds to do (even faster if you are in the process of making the chart and not changing colors in post)
Its main selling point is the fact that it's only 5 mm thick, instead of the 9.5"
Think you meant 9.5mm there.
At least it's not got proprietary connectors like the WD 5mm ones do. Think you need to add one of those to the benchmarks though - it's Seagate's biggest competition.
Not really; it'll cost significantly more per GB than a 9.5mm drive, but all the bays are fine with the thicker drives.
Regular thickness drives are $60-80 and this one is mentioned to be under $100 with no price given for the consumer market. I wouldn't mind paying a small premium for a drive that utilizes 53% of the area of a 9.5mm drive.
Please Tom's, get rid of the new format for pictures having the caption as an alpha-blended banner overlapping the bottom of the picture. This article's second picture, which attempts to illustrate the thinness of the new drive, is ruined by the new captioning method. Use some intelligence and put the caption UNDER the picture. This is the way that has worked for decades in both print and online. Why change something that works for a system that fails?