Kingston NV3 2230 2TB SSD Review: The Budget King is Back

Now with M.2 2230 goodness

Kingston NV3 2230 2TB SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Kingston NV3 2230 is the company’s budget take on this form factor, offering good all-around performance and power efficiency at a reasonable price.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Plenty of performance for the Steam Deck

  • +

    Very power-efficient

  • +

    Low pricing

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Not the fastest option

  • -

    QLC and/or variable flash

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

An NV series drive from Kingston needs no introduction. The company has been a leader in SSD module manufacturing, with a strong focus on delivering affordable drives worldwide. This series is a budget lynchpin, a fan favorite for inexpensive builds and upgrades. The Kingston NV3 2230 follows in these footsteps to help conquer a market that’s seen unprecedented growth since Valve’s Steam Deck launch, a shorter form factor solution that faces extra challenges when the goal is maximum capacity. Kingston meets this head-on with a drive that’s also relatively inexpensive, an important consideration in an increasingly turbulent storage market.

The good and bad news is that this means you know what you’re going to get: an affordable, passable drive with usually wide availability but unknown hardware. The first part is good. As for the controller and flash, well, you know that you can never be sure, as the NV series uses whatever is available. That’s bad. How much does this matter for M.2 2230? Well, given the drive’s specifications, which set the minimum, this drive is plenty fast for any device that can take it. The controllers that pass muster and can fit on M.2 2230 are largely decent and will usually be paired with adequate flash – our sample has good hardware even with its QLC flash. This usually means a power-efficient drive, which is critically important for this form factor. The highest capacities also need newer or future flash to work, although we wouldn’t be surprised if some lingering QLC stock could end up on the drive, and that’s less ideal at the most common capacities.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Shane Downing
Contributing Writer

Shane Downing is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering consumer storage, PC hardware, and AI.

  • Shiznizzle
    160 TBW "endurance" for the 500 GB model.

    Hard pass, right off of the bat. Not going into my raspberry pi. Whats funny is that is has a 5 year warranty but even normal use on a 500GB model where you swap game installs due to the small size, will mean that you will never, ever, see the 5 years warranty period.

    160 TBW for a nvme ssd is terrible.

    Even their 2280, 2 TB models are 139 pounds sterling and still only have 640 TBW "endurance".

    What are they doing? Using up all their "wont pass binning for best chip status" chips and slapping them on consumer gear? qlc?

    When it comes to M2 SSD's i dont care about speeds. What i do care about is not needing to replace the thing in a year. 160 TBW is nothing in terms of data written and i dont deal with large files on a regular basis either. I do swap out games a lot though and those just keep getting bigger and bigger. That is what eats up drives for me. Games.

    Now that 2 TB are "affordable" and dont cost hundreds of pounds people are now moving up to them. Ive seen some 2400 tbw drives
    Reply