Why you can trust Tom's Hardware
GPUs are also used with professional applications, AI training and inferencing, and more. We still don't have a great AI benchmark, though we did test Stable Diffusion with output settings of 2048x1152 and it mostly seems to work — on Nvidia GPUs at any rate. We also have several 3D rendering applications that leverage ray tracing hardware (two of which only work on Nvidia GPUs again), plus the SPECviewperf 2020 v3 test suite. Let's start there.
SPECviewperf 2020 consists of eight different benchmarks, and we use the geometric mean from those to generate an aggregate "overall" score. Note that this is not an official score, but it gives equal weight to the individual tests and provides a nice high-level overview of performance. Few professionals use all of these programs, however, so it's generally more important to look at the results for the applications you plan to use.
Across the eight tests, Nvidia's RTX 4070 Ti basically ties the RTX 3090 Ti, and trails the 4080 by 18% and the 4090 by 34%. AMD has improved its SPECviewperf results a lot with recent driver updates, which means the aggregate score has all of the tested AMD GPUs leading even the RTX 4090. That's largely thanks to the excellent performance in snx-04, or Nvidia's terrible performance on the consumer RTX cards. AMD also rates higher in catia-06, creo-03, and medical-03, while Nvidia GPUs do better in 3dsmax-07, maya-06, and solidworks-07 — with energy-03 being more neutral.
Moving on to 3D rendering, Blender is a popular open-source rendering application, and we're using the latest Blender Benchmark, which uses Blender 3.40 and three tests. Blender 3.40 also includes the new Cycles X engine that leverages ray tracing hardware on AMD, Nvidia, and even Intel Arc GPUs. It does so via AMD's HIP interface (Heterogeneous-computing Interface for Portability), Nvidia's CUDA or OptiX APIs, and Intel's OneAPI — which means Nvidia GPUs have some performance advantages due to the OptiX API.
The 4070 Ti ends up just ahead of the 3090 Ti this time, winning in two of three individual scenes as well as in the aggregate score. It's interesting that Junkshop favors the 3090 Ti, probably because it has a larger memory footprint and thus hits some bottlenecks with only 12GB VRAM. AMD's GPUs meanwhile fall far behind with the 4070 Ti basically doubling the performance of the 7900 XTX. The 4070 Ti also trails the 4080 by 22% in Blender performance.
Our final two professional applications only have ray tracing hardware support for Nvidia's GPUs. We reached out to the companies to find out why that's the case, and it largely comes down to reliability and stability — Optane dropped OpenCL support for example because the API was no longer seeing active development.
While we don't have the AMD GPUs, the performance rankings in OctaneBench and V-Ray both end up being relatively similar to the Blender results. Octane puts the 4070 Ti roughly on equal footing with the 3090 Ti, as does V-Ray, while performance trails the 4080 by 23% and 25%.
- MORE: Best Graphics Cards
- MORE: GPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy
- MORE: All Graphics Content
Current page: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: Professional and Content Creation Performance
Prev Page GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: 1080p Gaming Performance Next Page GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: Power, Clocks, Temps, Fans, and NoiseJarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.
-
sabicao Admin said:Our GeForce RTX 4070 Ti testing reveals good performance and efficiency, but this is a large jump in generational pricing that will displease many gamers. It's barely faster than the previous generation RTX 3080 Ti and 3080 12GB, at a relatively similar price, with DLSS 3 being the potential grace.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU : Read more
I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way. -
JarredWaltonGPU
Do you not know what "almost" means? And while some would take "palatable" to mean really tasty, that's not the way I normally use it. I use it more as "acceptable but not awesome." I wouldn't call an excellent dinner "palatable," I'd say it was delicious or some other word that means I really like it. Taco Bell is palatable, for example. So is Wendy's. But neither is great, just like an $800 replacement that's only moderately faster than the outgoing $800 cards.oofdragon said:The price is Not almost palatable, stop trying to sell this nonsense -
JarredWaltonGPU
They're only "wrong" when everyone refuses to pay them. Unfortunately, we're being shown time and time again that there are apparently enough people willing to spend $800 for this level of performance that we'll continue to see them. As stated in the conclusion, if Nvidia had tried to sell this as a $600 card, or a $500 card, and then scalpers just snapped them all up and asked for $800 or more, we'd be right back where we started. Except then we'd have scalpers contributing nothing and taking a chunk of the profits.sabicao said:I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.
So yeah, don't buy a $800 card if you don't want to spend that much. Wait for prices to come down, or go with a cheaper and slower alternative. But if others keep paying a lot more than you're willing to pay, nothing is going to change. -
hannibal Cheaper than expected…Reply
Lets see what real price end up after two to tree weeks… when those few ”cheap” MSRP GPUs run out… $1200? -
Elusive Ruse Hmmm, appreciate the review Jared, yet I gotta object to your "almost" endearing tone and conclusion. Also, you insist that this is an $800 card, yet the TUF gaming you reviewed here reportedly costs $850.Reply -
peachpuff "Portal RTX at 24 fps on a 4090 gets 42 fps with Frame Generation enabled, but without upscaling, but it still feels like 24 fps. That's because the user input is still running at 24 fps."Reply
Wow really? Never knew this, interesting tidbit. -
-Fran- Thanks for the review!Reply
This is a big can of "meh; pass". Much like with the 7900XT. Ironically, the 7900XTX made the 4080-16GB look better and now nVidia returning the hand, making the 7900XT less stupid. They're still both in stupid territory, though.
I mostly agree with everything, so nothing more to add, really. Maybe just the mention this card won't have an FE (as I've read and heard), so the first batch of $800 cards will last whatever the AIBs want them to be on shelves. Which, I'm sure, won't be long. This card will be over $850 for sure.
Regards. -
Loadedaxe sabicao said:I really do feel Toms', Anand and all the other highly regarded tech sites have an obligation to express how stupid these prices are. Sure, we the customers have to use our voice by not buying, but you Sirs should be witing in every review how wrong all these new price points are. Newcomers cannot be led to believe that it is ok for a x70 series to cost 700 bucks. No freaking way.
He did say it. In the title.
Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Review: A Costly 70-Class GPU
Open up your wallet and say ouch
He said it professionally, many times through out his review. I am going to assume you didn't read the whole review, so maybe you should, its there.
These cards are palatable, because most plebs pay for them. As long as everyone keeps paying these prices, Nvidia is going to keep charging them. If you all want gpu prices lower, skip a gen or two, speak with your money, not your mouth. -
DavidLejdar Seems a bit weak-ish for 4K gaming, and there are cheaper GPUs, which work fine for 1440p gaming. It still has quite some performance, and the 4K FPS are not bad as such. The numbers just don't convince me that it wouldn't drop below 60 (real) FPS at 4K with the next round of game releases, so I wouldn't pick it up for 4K at that price.Reply
And scalpers sure may be an issue, but if the RTX 4070 Ti is meant as "the entry-level GPU for 4K gaming, or for top 1440p gaming", then it wouldn't necessarily be a miscalculation if it would be produced in higher numbers, so that scalpers would have a garage full of them while they still would be in-stock at the retailers.